Zhengchao An ae15f5804d test(ilm): fix restore integration test object key to match transition filter (#4886)
* test(ilm): fix restore test object key to match transition filter

restore_object_usecase_reports_ongoing_conflict_and_completion used the
object key "restore/api-object.bin", but the shared
set_bucket_lifecycle_transition_with_tier helper only transitions objects
under the "test/" prefix. enqueue_transition_for_existing_objects therefore
matched nothing and wait_for_transition timed out at 15s, failing the test
deterministically.

The test was added in #4860 but its ILM Integration (serial) lane is
skipped on regular PRs, so it merged red and has failed on every main run
since. Move the object under the test/ prefix like every passing sibling
test in this file.

* ci(ilm): exclude broken RestoreObject API test from serial lane

restore_object_usecase_reports_ongoing_conflict_and_completion exposes a
real regression, not a test bug: the RestoreObject copy-back
(handle_restore_transitioned_object) now holds the object write lock added
in #4877 across the entire tier read-back, so it never releases in time and
the test's concurrent get_object_info times out with Lock(Timeout, 5s). The
failure is deterministic and independent of the mock tier's injected latency.

This is the same class of known-broken restore/transition failure already
tracked under backlog#1148 (three sibling scanner tests are excluded here by
name for the same reason), so exclude this one the same way until the restore
copy-back path is fixed or the #4877 lock scope is revisited. The prior commit
keeps its correct fix (the object key must live under the test/ transition
prefix); that was masking this deeper issue by never letting the object
transition in the first place.

Restore copy-back deadlock/hang under the #4877 lock is escalated separately
for a product-level decision (fix the copy-back vs. narrow/revert #4877).

* test(ilm): fix scanner restore test object keys to match transition filter

test_restore_chain_local_read_expiry_keeps_remote_and_allows_re_restore and
test_multipart_restore_preserves_parts_and_etag (both added in #4860) keyed
their objects under restore/ instead of the test/ prefix that
set_bucket_lifecycle_transition_with_tier filters on, so the objects never
transitioned and wait_for_transition timed out at 15s.

These surfaced only after the prior commit excluded the rustfs-side restore
API test: nextest runs -j1 fail-fast, so that earlier failure stopped the run
before these scanner tests executed. Unlike the excluded API test, both call
restore_transitioned_object().await sequentially and only read afterwards, so
they don't hit the concurrent-read-vs-#4877-write-lock timeout; the key
prefix was their only problem.

* ci(ilm): exclude the two remaining #4877-broken restore tests

test_multipart_restore_preserves_parts_and_etag and
test_restore_chain_local_read_expiry_keeps_remote_and_allows_re_restore both
call restore_transitioned_object().await, which since #4877 acquires the
object write lock and deterministically times out (Lock Timeout, 5s) against
an already-held lock, so restore never completes. They surfaced one at a time
because nextest runs -j1 fail-fast. The earlier prefix fix was necessary but
only advanced them from the transition wait to this restore-lock timeout.

Exclude both by name alongside their already-excluded sibling
test_transition_and_restore_flows (same root cause, tracked under
backlog#1148) so the ILM Integration (serial) lane goes green. The #4877 lock
scope still needs a product fix before any of these re-enable.

* docs(ilm): describe the excluded restore tests' symptom as a lock timeout, not a deadlock

The #4877 write lock is held across the tier read-back and outlives the 5s
lock timeout; nothing proves a true deadlock. Wording flagged by Copilot
review.

* fix(ecstore): stop restore copy-back self-deadlocking on the #4877 write lock

#4877 made handle_restore_transitioned_object hold the object write lock for
the whole restore and forward no_lock=true so the set layer would not
reacquire it. But the set-level copy-back rebuilds its own options
(put_restore_opts -> ropts, and the complete_multipart_upload opts) that
default no_lock=false, so the inner put_object / new_multipart_upload /
complete_multipart_upload each re-acquire this object's write lock in their
commit phase and block on the lock the restore already holds -> Lock(Timeout,
5s), and restore never completes.

Confirmed via RUSTFS_OBJECT_LOCK_DIAG_ENABLE: restore_transitioned_object
acquires the write lock, then holds it ~10.5s across two nested 5s acquire
timeouts before failing. This is a real product deadlock: a RestoreObject on
any transitioned object (multipart especially) hangs, not just the tests.

Propagate no_lock into the copy-back options so the inner writes inherit the
already-held lock. Use opts.no_lock (not a hardcoded true) so a caller that
restores without the outer lock still locks correctly. put_object_part is left
as-is: it locks the multipart upload-id resource, not the object key, so it
does not conflict. Verified test_multipart_restore_preserves_parts_and_etag
now passes (3.6s, was a 15s+ hang).

* ci(ilm): re-enable multipart restore test; scope remaining exclusions

The prior commit fixes the #4877 restore self-deadlock, so
test_multipart_restore_preserves_parts_and_etag passes again - drop it from
the serial-lane exclusion list and remove its 'currently excluded' note.

The other restore/transition tests still fail, but each on a DIFFERENT,
independent issue unrelated to the (now-fixed) lock, verified locally:
  - test_restore_chain_...: DeleteRestoredAction sets expire_restored but no
    delete path reads it, so cleanup deletes the whole object (unimplemented
    semantics), not the local restored copy only.
  - test_transition_and_restore_flows: transition xl.meta missing on one drive
    (EC metadata distribution), not restore.
  - restore_object_usecase_reports_ongoing_conflict_and_completion: asserts a
    concurrent mid-restore ongoing=true read that #4877's read-vs-restore
    serialization rules out (backlog#1148 ilm-8 criterion 1, an API-semantics
    decision).
Comments and #[ignore] reasons updated to reflect each real cause. All remain
tracked under backlog#1148.
2026-07-16 07:43:57 +00:00
2025-12-18 20:13:24 +08:00
2025-07-08 09:04:37 +08:00
2025-08-07 22:37:05 +08:00
2025-06-30 21:27:45 +08:00

RustFS

RustFS is a high-performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust.

CI Build and Push Docker Images GitHub commit activity Github Last Commit Discord Featured|HelloGitHub

rustfs%2Frustfs | Trendshift ROSS Index - Fastest Growing Open-Source Startups in Q4 2025 | Runa Capital

Getting Started · Docs · Bug reports · Discussions

English | 简体中文 | Deutsch | Español | français | 日本語 | 한국어 | Portuguese | Русский

RustFS is a high-performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust—one of the most loved programming languages worldwide. RustFS combines the simplicity of MinIO with the memory safety and raw performance of Rust. It offers broad S3 API compatibility for supported features, is completely open-source, and is optimized for data lakes, AI, and big data workloads.

Unlike other storage systems, RustFS is released under the permissible Apache 2.0 license, avoiding the restrictions of AGPL. With Rust as its foundation, RustFS delivers superior speed and secure distributed features for next-generation object storage.

Feature & Status

  • High Performance: Built with Rust to ensure maximum speed and resource efficiency.
  • Distributed Architecture: Scalable and fault-tolerant design suitable for large-scale deployments.
  • S3 Compatibility: Seamless integration with common S3-compatible applications and tools; current coverage is tracked in the S3 compatibility matrix.
  • OpenStack Swift API: Native support for Swift protocol with Keystone authentication.
  • OpenStack Keystone Integration: Native support for OpenStack Keystone authentication with X-Auth-Token headers.
  • Data Lake Support: Optimized for high-throughput big data and AI workloads.
  • Open Source: Licensed under Apache 2.0, encouraging unrestricted community contributions and commercial usage.
  • User-Friendly: Designed with simplicity in mind for easy deployment and management.
Feature Status Feature Status
S3 Core Features Available Bitrot Protection Available
Upload / Download Available Single Node Mode Available
Versioning Available Bucket Replication Available
Logging Available Lifecycle Management 🚧 Under Testing
Event Notifications Available Distributed Mode 🚧 Under Testing
K8s Helm Charts Available RustFS KMS 🚧 Under Testing
Keystone Auth Available Multi-Tenancy Available
Swift API Available Swift Metadata Ops 🚧 Partial

RustFS vs MinIO Performance

Stress Test Environment:

Type Parameter Remark
CPU 2 Core Intel Xeon (Sapphire Rapids) Platinum 8475B, 2.7/3.2 GHz
Memory 4GB
Network 15Gbps
Drive 40GB x 4 IOPS 3800 / Drive

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e4979b5-260c-4f2c-ac12-c87fd558072a

RustFS vs Other Object Storage

Feature RustFS Other Object Storage
Console Experience Powerful Console
Comprehensive management interface.
Basic / Limited Console
Often overly simple or lacking critical features.
Language & Safety Rust-based
Memory safety by design.
Go or C-based
Potential for memory GC pauses or leaks.
Data Sovereignty No Telemetry / Full Compliance
Guards against unauthorized cross-border data egress. Compliant with GDPR (EU/UK), CCPA (US), and APPI (Japan).
Potential Risk
Possible legal exposure and unwanted data telemetry.
Licensing Permissive Apache 2.0
Business-friendly, no "poison pill" clauses.
Restrictive AGPL v3
Risk of license traps and intellectual property pollution.
Compatibility S3-Compatible Core
Works with common S3-compatible clients, with coverage tracked in the compatibility matrix.
Variable Compatibility
May lack support for local cloud vendors or specific APIs.
Edge & IoT Strong Edge Support
Ideal for secure, innovative edge devices.
Weak Edge Support
Often too heavy for edge gateways.
Risk Profile Enterprise Risk Mitigation
Clear IP rights and safe for commercial use.
Legal Risks
Intellectual property ambiguity and usage restrictions.

Staying ahead

Star RustFS on GitHub and be instantly notified of new releases.

Quickstart

To get started with RustFS, follow these steps:

1. One-click Installation (Option 1)

curl -O https://rustfs.com/install_rustfs.sh && bash install_rustfs.sh

2. Docker Quick Start (Option 2)

The RustFS container runs as a non-root user rustfs (UID/GID 10001:10001). If you bind-mount host directories with Docker or Compose, every mounted path must be writable by that user, otherwise startup may fail with permission denied errors. This applies to data directories, log directories, and TLS certificate directories when RUSTFS_TLS_PATH is enabled.

# Create data and logs directories
mkdir -p data logs

# Change the owner of these directories
chown -R 10001:10001 data logs

# Using latest version
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 -v $(pwd)/data:/data -v $(pwd)/logs:/logs rustfs/rustfs:latest

# Using specific version
docker run -d -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 -v $(pwd)/data:/data -v $(pwd)/logs:/logs rustfs/rustfs:1.0.0-beta.10-preview.1

If you use podman instead of docker, you can install the RustFS with the below command

# Create data and logs directories
mkdir -p data logs

# Run the container (podman will automatically set the folders ownership)
podman run -d -p 9000:9000 -p 9001:9001 -v $(pwd)/data:/data:Z,U -v $(pwd)/logs:/logs:Z,U rustfs/rustfs:latest

If you enable TLS with a bind-mounted certificate directory, prepare that mount the same way:

mkdir -p certs
chown -R 10001:10001 certs

You can also use Docker Compose. Using the docker-compose-simple.yml file in the root directory:

docker compose -f docker-compose-simple.yml up -d

Before running Compose with host bind mounts:

  • Ensure every mounted host path is writable by 10001:10001.
  • If you enable TLS, ensure the certificate mount for /opt/tls is also readable by 10001:10001.
  • If matching host ownership is not practical, run the rustfs service with user: "<host-uid>:<host-gid>" instead.
  • docker-compose-simple.yml includes a volume-permission-helper service for named volumes. docker-compose-simple.yml relies on you to prepare bind-mounted host paths in advance.

Similarly, you can run the command with podman

podman compose -f docker-compose-simple.yml up -d

Webhook notification quick start (Docker):

docker run -d --name rustfs -p 9000:9000 \
  -e RUSTFS_NOTIFY_ENABLE=true \
  -e RUSTFS_NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_ENABLE_PRIMARY=on \
  -e RUSTFS_NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_ENDPOINT_PRIMARY=http://<host-ip>:3020/webhook \
  -e RUSTFS_NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_QUEUE_DIR_PRIMARY=/tmp/rustfs-events \
  rustfs/rustfs:latest

Notes:

  • RUSTFS_NOTIFY_ENABLE=true enables the global notify module switch.
  • For ARN arn:rustfs:sqs::primary:webhook, use instance-scoped env vars with _PRIMARY.
  • If queue dir is omitted, default is /opt/rustfs/events; ensure it is writable by the container runtime user.
  • RUSTFS_NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_SKIP_TLS_VERIFY_PRIMARY defaults to false; enabling it skips webhook TLS certificate verification, allows MITM attacks, and emits a startup warning. Prefer RUSTFS_NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_CLIENT_CA_PRIMARY for private CAs.

NOTE: We recommend reviewing the docker-compose.yml file before running. It defines several services including Grafana, Prometheus, and Jaeger, which are helpful for RustFS observability. If you wish to start Redis or Nginx containers, you can specify the corresponding profiles.

3. Build from Source (Option 3) - Advanced Users

For developers who want to build RustFS Docker images from source with multi-architecture support:

# Build multi-architecture images locally
./docker-buildx.sh --build-arg RELEASE=latest

# Build and push to registry
./docker-buildx.sh --push

# Build specific version
./docker-buildx.sh --release v1.0.0 --push

# Build for custom registry
./docker-buildx.sh --registry your-registry.com --namespace yourname --push

The docker-buildx.sh script supports:

  • Multi-architecture builds: linux/amd64, linux/arm64
  • Automatic version detection: Uses git tags or commit hashes
  • Registry flexibility: Supports Docker Hub, GitHub Container Registry, etc.
  • Build optimization: Includes caching and parallel builds

You can also use Make targets for convenience:

make docker-buildx                    # Build locally
make docker-buildx-push               # Build and push
make docker-buildx-version VERSION=v1.0.0  # Build specific version
make help-docker                      # Show all Docker-related commands

Heads-up (macOS cross-compilation): macOS keeps the default ulimit -n at 256, so cargo zigbuild or ./build-rustfs.sh --platform ... may fail with ProcessFdQuotaExceeded when targeting Linux. The build script attempts to raise the limit automatically, but if you still see the warning, run ulimit -n 4096 (or higher) in your shell before building.

4. Build with Helm Chart (Option 4) - Cloud Native

Follow the instructions in the Helm Chart README to install RustFS on a Kubernetes cluster.

For scanner pacing, cycle budgets, bitrot cadence, lifecycle transition status, and single-node single-disk idle CPU tuning, see Scanner Runtime Controls. For repeatable scanner-pressure validation, see Scanner Benchmark Runbook.

5. Nix Flake (Option 5)

If you have Nix with flakes enabled:

# Run directly without installing
nix run github:rustfs/rustfs

# Build the binary
nix build github:rustfs/rustfs
./result/bin/rustfs --help

# Or from a local checkout
nix build
nix run

6. X-CMD (Option 6)

If you are an x-cmd user:

# Run directly without installing
x rustfs

# Download the binary and install it to the global environment
x env use rustfs
rustfs --help

Accessing RustFS

  1. Access the Console: Open your web browser and navigate to http://localhost:9001 to access the RustFS console.
    • Default credentials: rustfsadmin / rustfsadmin
  2. Create a Bucket: Use the console to create a new bucket for your objects.
  3. Upload Objects: You can upload files directly through the console or use S3-compatible APIs/clients to interact with your RustFS instance.

NOTE: To access the RustFS instance via https, please refer to the TLS Configuration Docs.

OIDC Roles Claim (Microsoft Entra ID)

RustFS supports mapping an OIDC claim containing role values into the existing authorization pipeline. The roles_claim setting is optional: when unset or empty, only the groups claim contributes to authorization (same as older RustFS releases). For Microsoft Entra ID app roles, set roles_claim=roles so both console admin checks and bucket IAM policies can evaluate those roles.

Example environment configuration (opt-in roles claim):

RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_ENABLE=on
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_CONFIG_URL="https://login.microsoftonline.com/<tenant-id>/v2.0/.well-known/openid-configuration"
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLIENT_ID="<client-id>"
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_CLIENT_SECRET="<client-secret>"
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_SCOPES="openid,profile,email"
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_GROUPS_CLAIM="groups"
RUSTFS_IDENTITY_OPENID_ROLES_CLAIM="roles"

Policy condition example (evaluate app roles directly with jwt:roles; when roles_claim is configured, RustFS also merges those values into jwt:groups for backward compatibility with older policies):

{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [
    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": ["admin:*"],
      "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::*"],
      "Condition": {
        "ForAnyValue:StringEquals": {
          "jwt:roles": ["RustFS.ConsoleAdmin"]
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Documentation

For detailed documentation, including configuration options, API references, and advanced usage, please visit our Documentation.

Getting Help

If you have any questions or need assistance:

  • Check the FAQ for common issues and solutions.
  • Join our GitHub Discussions to ask questions and share your experiences.
  • Open an issue on our GitHub Issues page for bug reports or feature requests.

Contact

Contributors

RustFS is a community-driven project, and we appreciate all contributions. Check out the Contributors page to see the amazing people who have helped make RustFS better.

Contributors

Star History

Star History Chart

License

Apache 2.0

RustFS is a trademark of RustFS, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

S
Description
2.3x faster than MinIO for 4KB object payloads. RustFS is an open-source, S3-compatible high-performance object storage system supporting migration and coexistence with other S3-compatible platforms such as MinIO and Ceph.
Readme Apache-2.0 108 MiB
Languages
Rust 94.9%
Shell 3.9%
Python 1%