Multi-AZ clusters, read replicas and point-in-time restore were declared not
applicable, which says the platform will never serve them. All three are
planned, so the pages claimed something the roadmap contradicts.
Only a declaration now publishes that claim. A handler that refuses an
operation today establishes nothing about tomorrow, so it reads as the gap it
is rather than a permanent one.
Splitting them into a second table repeated a reason on every row that shared
it and separated an operation from the rest of the surface it belongs to. One
table carries every operation the platform answers, served or refused, and the
reasons return to numbered footnotes below it.
S3 was the one served surface with no coverage page. The gateway has no
operation-name dispatch table for it, so there was nothing to compare against
the model.
Predastore now declares the operations each of its S3 routes answers, so the
generator compares that inventory the same way it compares the other nine
services. The page credits Predastore rather than Spinifex, and its intro
separates what is routed from what conforms, pointing at the ceph/s3-tests
report for the second.
The index listed a count per service and left the reader to add them up. It
now opens with the total and closes the table with it, counting only the
services it links.
The coverage pages led with a percentage and an "x of y" count, and every
table listed the modelled operations Spinifex does not implement, which reads
as a scorecard against AWS rather than a statement of what the platform serves.
A published page now opens with the operation count alone, tables the
operations the gateway serves, and carries a separate not-applicable table with
each reason inline instead of footnotes. The unimplemented operations and the
counts move to docs/coverage/internal-report.md, which no docs-site slug points
at. A service with no implemented operations has no publishable page.
Julian Sommer