Files
rustfs/INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT_RFC.md
T
2026-05-21 15:40:39 +00:00

482 lines
23 KiB
Markdown

# RFC: Pluggable Internode Data Transport
> Status: draft
> Last updated: 2026-05-21
> Scope: internode data-path analysis, benchmark baseline, and transport boundary
## Summary
RustFS does not currently include RDMA, RoCE, InfiniBand, DPU, BlueField/DOCA,
DPDK, SPDK, or SmartNIC offload support. The current distributed internode
paths use TCP-based HTTP/gRPC transports:
- `tonic` gRPC `NodeService` for most control, metadata, lock, health, and
peer operations.
- HTTP streaming routes under `/rustfs/rpc/` for remote disk file streams.
RDMA/RoCE is still a plausible future optimization for large internode disk
data transfers, but it should not replace the whole internode RPC surface.
The correct first step is to isolate the data plane, establish a TCP baseline,
and introduce a pluggable transport boundary only around high-volume streams.
Current implementation status:
- `InternodeDataTransport` exists in
`crates/ecstore/src/rpc/internode_data_transport.rs`.
- The default and only production backend is `tcp-http`; `tcp` is accepted as
an alias.
- `RUSTFS_INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT` selects the backend. Blank or unset values
use `tcp-http`; invalid values fail closed.
- `RemoteDisk::read_file_stream`, `RemoteDisk::create_file`,
`RemoteDisk::append_file`, and `RemoteDisk::walk_dir` delegate to the
transport.
- `NodeService` gRPC remains the internode control plane and continues to carry
metadata/control operations.
## Goals
- Document the current internode control plane and data plane.
- Identify the existing transfer paths that could benefit from a future
high-throughput backend.
- Define the minimum benchmark baseline required before transport changes.
- Sketch a pluggable transport boundary that preserves the current TCP/HTTP
behavior as the default backend.
- Reserve explicit boundaries for future RDMA/RoCE/InfiniBand work without
committing RustFS to a specific vendor stack.
## Non-Goals
- Implement RDMA, RoCE, InfiniBand, DPU, DOCA, DPDK, SPDK, or SmartNIC support.
- Replace `tonic` gRPC for control-plane RPCs.
- Redesign erasure coding, quorum handling, disk health tracking, or object
correctness semantics.
- Require RDMA-capable hardware for default development, CI, or ordinary
RustFS deployments.
## Current Internode Architecture
### Server-side entry points
The main HTTP server builds a hybrid service per connection:
- `rustfs/src/server/http.rs` wires a `NodeServiceServer` for gRPC.
- `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/InternodeRpcService` intercepts HTTP paths under
`/rustfs/rpc/`.
- Other HTTP/S3 traffic continues through the normal S3 service.
Compression logic already treats `/rustfs/rpc/` and `/rustfs/peer/` as internode
RPC paths and skips normal response compression for them.
### gRPC channel management
`crates/protos/src/lib.rs` creates internode gRPC channels with `tonic`
`Endpoint`:
- connect timeout
- TCP keepalive
- HTTP/2 keepalive interval and timeout
- request timeout
- optional TLS configuration
- global channel caching and failed-connection eviction
This confirms the current gRPC transport is TCP/HTTP2-based.
### NodeService layout
`crates/protos/src/node.proto` defines one `NodeService` that mixes several
classes of RPCs:
- meta service: bucket and metadata operations
- disk service: local/remote disk operations
- lock service: distributed lock operations
- peer rest service: node health, metrics, IAM/policy reload, rebalance,
profiling, events, and admin-style operations
The service layout is practical today, but it is too broad to become an RDMA
surface. A future high-throughput transport should target only disk data
streams and keep this gRPC service as the control plane.
## Control Plane vs Data Plane
### Control plane
These paths carry coordination, metadata, health, and administrative state.
They should remain on gRPC/TCP:
| Area | Client/server code | Examples | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bucket peer ops | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/peer_s3_client.rs`, `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/bucket.rs` | `MakeBucket`, `ListBucket`, `DeleteBucket`, `GetBucketInfo`, `HealBucket` | Small metadata/control payloads. |
| Locking | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/remote_locker.rs`, `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/lock.rs` | `Lock`, `UnLock`, `Refresh`, batch lock/unlock | Latency-sensitive but not bulk data; correctness and timeout semantics matter more than transport bandwidth. |
| Peer/admin state | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/peer_rest_client.rs`, `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/health.rs`, `metrics.rs`, `event.rs` | `LocalStorageInfo`, `ServerInfo`, `GetMetrics`, `GetLiveEvents`, reload APIs, rebalance APIs | Operational control plane. |
| Disk metadata/control | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/remote_disk.rs`, `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs` | `DiskInfo`, `ReadXL`, `ReadVersion`, `ReadMetadata`, `WriteMetadata`, `RenameFile`, `RenamePart`, `Delete*`, `VerifyFile`, `CheckParts` | Usually metadata, integrity checks, or namespace mutations. |
| Connection health | `RemoteDisk`, `RemotePeerS3Client`, `PeerRestClient` | TCP connectivity probes and fault/recovery state | Must remain available even if an optional data backend is unavailable. |
### Data plane candidates
These paths move object shard bytes or stream potentially large disk data and
are the only reasonable first candidates for a pluggable transport.
| Priority | Path | Current client | Current server | Current transport | Why it matters |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| P0 | `read_file_stream` | `RemoteDisk::read_file_stream` | `handle_read_file` in `http_service.rs` | HTTP `GET /rustfs/rpc/read_file_stream` with a streaming response body | Main remote disk read stream used by bitrot readers and erasure reads. |
| P0 | `put_file_stream` | `RemoteDisk::create_file` and `RemoteDisk::append_file` | `handle_put_file` in `http_service.rs` | HTTP `PUT /rustfs/rpc/put_file_stream` with a streaming request body | Main remote disk write stream used by bitrot writers and erasure writes. |
| P1 | `walk_dir` | `RemoteDisk::walk_dir` | `handle_walk_dir` in `http_service.rs` | HTTP `GET /rustfs/rpc/walk_dir` with a streamed metadata listing | Can be high-volume during scans/healing, but it is metadata-oriented rather than object byte data. |
| P1 | `ReadAll` / `WriteAll` | `RemoteDisk::read_all` / `write_all` | gRPC unary disk handlers | gRPC unary `bytes` payload | Moves bytes today, but should be measured before treating it as a high-throughput data path. |
| P2 | proto `WriteStream` / `ReadAt` | currently not used | currently returns unimplemented | gRPC streaming definitions exist but are not implemented | Possible future API shape, not a current production path. |
## P1 Data Path Inventory
Classification:
- Covered by `InternodeDataTransport`: `RemoteDisk` opens the transfer through
the transport abstraction.
- Still direct TCP/HTTP/gRPC: bytes move over a fixed internode protocol
outside the transport abstraction.
- Metadata/control-plane only: payloads are expected to be small metadata,
namespace, lock, health, or admin messages.
- Not relevant: declared or test-only paths that are not current production
data paths.
### Covered by `InternodeDataTransport`
| Path | Owner references | Server references | Classification | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Remote shard read stream | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/remote_disk.rs::RemoteDisk::read_file_stream`; `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/internode_data_transport.rs::InternodeDataTransport::open_read`; `crates/ecstore/src/bitrot.rs::create_bitrot_reader` | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/http_service.rs::handle_read_file` | Covered by `InternodeDataTransport` | Object GET, repair reads, and erasure decode use this path for remote shard bytes. |
| Remote shard write stream | `RemoteDisk::create_file`; `RemoteDisk::append_file`; `InternodeDataTransport::open_write`; `crates/ecstore/src/bitrot.rs::create_bitrot_writer` | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/http_service.rs::handle_put_file` | Covered by `InternodeDataTransport` | Object PUT and multipart part upload use this path for remote shard bytes. |
| Remote namespace walk stream | `RemoteDisk::walk_dir`; `InternodeDataTransport::open_walk_dir`; `crates/ecstore/src/cache_value/metacache_set.rs` walk producers | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/http_service.rs::handle_walk_dir` | Covered by `InternodeDataTransport` | High-volume listing/scanner/heal metadata stream. It is not object byte data, but it is a large internode stream. |
| Remote zero-copy read fallback | `RemoteDisk::read_file_zero_copy` | same as remote shard read stream | Covered by `InternodeDataTransport` through `read_file_stream` | The remote path buffers the stream into `Bytes`; true zero-copy is not guaranteed for remote disks. |
### Still Direct TCP/HTTP/gRPC
| Path | Owner references | Server references | Classification | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `ReadAll` | `RemoteDisk::read_all`; `crates/ecstore/src/store_init.rs`; heal resume metadata readers | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_read_all` | Still direct gRPC | Unary `bytes` response. Currently used mostly for metadata/config files; measure before moving. |
| `WriteAll` | `RemoteDisk::write_all`; `crates/ecstore/src/store_init.rs`; heal resume metadata writers | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_write_all` | Still direct gRPC | Unary `bytes` request. Currently used mostly for metadata/config/checkpoint writes. |
| `ReadMultiple` | `RemoteDisk::read_multiple`; `crates/ecstore/src/set_disk/read.rs::read_multiple_files` | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_read_multiple` | Still direct gRPC | Returns multiple small file payloads, usually metadata/listing support. Could become large with many entries. |
| `ReadParts` | `RemoteDisk::read_parts`; `crates/ecstore/src/set_disk/read.rs::read_parts`; multipart list/complete paths | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_read_parts` | Still direct gRPC | Encoded `ObjectPartInfo` metadata, not object data. |
| `RenamePart` | `RemoteDisk::rename_part`; `crates/ecstore/src/set_disk/write.rs::rename_part` | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_rename_part` | Still direct gRPC | Carries part metadata while committing multipart data already written through stream writers. |
| `ListDir` | `RemoteDisk::list_dir`; multipart/lifecycle metadata listing callers | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_list_dir` | Still direct gRPC | Directory name listing, metadata/control-plane unless measured otherwise. |
| Legacy gRPC `WalkDir` | `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/node_service.rs::NodeService::walk_dir` | same file | Still direct gRPC | Server implementation remains, but current `RemoteDisk::walk_dir` uses HTTP through the transport. Keep until callers are audited or compatibility policy is set. |
### Metadata/control-plane only
| Area | Owner references | Classification | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Disk metadata and namespace mutations | `RemoteDisk::{read_metadata,write_metadata,update_metadata,read_version,read_xl,rename_data,rename_file,delete*,verify_file,check_parts,disk_info}` | Metadata/control-plane only | These remain on gRPC by design. |
| Peer/bucket/admin operations | `crates/ecstore/src/rpc/{peer_s3_client.rs,peer_rest_client.rs,remote_locker.rs}` and matching `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/*` handlers | Metadata/control-plane only | Not candidates for a data-plane backend without separate measurements. |
| Store init and format operations | `crates/ecstore/src/store_init.rs` | Metadata/control-plane only | Uses `ReadAll`/`WriteAll` for small format/config objects. |
| Heal orchestration | `crates/heal/src/heal/storage.rs` and `crates/ecstore/src/set_disk.rs::heal_object` | Metadata/control-plane plus covered data reads | Heal object data reads go through `get_object_reader` and then covered shard streams; resume/checkpoint metadata uses direct gRPC disk metadata calls. |
### Not Relevant Current Paths
| Path | Owner references | Classification | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Proto `Write` | `crates/protos/src/node.proto`; `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/disk.rs::handle_write` | Not relevant | Handler is unimplemented. |
| Proto `WriteStream` | `crates/protos/src/node.proto`; `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/node_service.rs::write_stream` | Not relevant | Returns `unimplemented`. |
| Proto `ReadAt` | `crates/protos/src/node.proto`; `rustfs/src/storage/rpc/node_service.rs::read_at` | Not relevant | Returns `unimplemented`. |
| E2E reliant gRPC helpers | `crates/e2e_test/src/reliant/*` | Not relevant | Test harnesses, not production internode data-path callers. |
### Current Limitations
| Risk | Limitation |
| --- | --- |
| Medium | `ReadAll` and `WriteAll` still carry unary `bytes` over gRPC. They appear metadata-oriented today, but there is no size threshold or routing policy. |
| Medium | `ReadMultiple` can aggregate many metadata files into one gRPC response. |
| Low | Legacy gRPC `WalkDir` remains implemented while `RemoteDisk::walk_dir` uses HTTP through the transport. |
| Medium | Remote `read_file_zero_copy` is a buffered read over the transport, not a remote zero-copy contract. |
| Medium | Server-side TCP HTTP route handling is outside the client-side trait. |
## Current Object Write Path
For object PUTs in distributed erasure mode, the relevant flow is:
1. Upper storage layers prepare object data and erasure metadata.
2. `SetDisks` selects local and remote disks.
3. `create_bitrot_writer` calls `disk.create_file(...)` for each shard writer.
4. For a remote disk, `RemoteDisk::create_file` delegates to
`InternodeDataTransport::open_write`.
5. `HttpWriter` sends an HTTP `PUT` to `/rustfs/rpc/put_file_stream`.
6. The remote node's `handle_put_file` opens the local file writer and copies
incoming body chunks into it.
7. `Erasure::encode` writes shards through `MultiWriter` to all selected
writers while enforcing write quorum.
This is the primary write data-plane candidate.
## Current Object Read Path
For object GETs and repair reads in distributed erasure mode, the relevant flow is:
1. `SetDisks` prepares shard readers for the selected disks.
2. `create_bitrot_reader` uses local zero-copy only when `disk.is_local()`.
3. For a remote disk, it calls `disk.read_file_stream(...)`.
4. `RemoteDisk::read_file_stream` delegates to
`InternodeDataTransport::open_read`.
5. `HttpReader` sends an HTTP `GET` to `/rustfs/rpc/read_file_stream`.
6. The remote node's `handle_read_file` opens the local disk stream and returns
it as an HTTP streaming body.
7. The erasure decoder reads from the shard streams and reconstructs the object.
This is the primary read data-plane candidate.
## Existing Metrics and Benchmark Surface
RustFS already has coarse internode metrics in `crates/io-metrics/src/internode_metrics.rs`:
- sent bytes
- received bytes
- outgoing requests
- incoming requests
- errors
- dial errors
- average dial time
These metrics are useful as a starting point. For backend comparisons, the
relevant route-level and operation-level dimensions are:
- `read_file_stream`
- `put_file_stream`
- `walk_dir`
- gRPC `ReadAll` / `WriteAll`
- gRPC control-plane request volume
Existing benchmark assets:
- `scripts/run_object_batch_bench.sh`
- `scripts/run_object_batch_bench_enhanced.sh`
- `scripts/run_object_batch_bench_abc.sh`
- `scripts/run_four_node_cluster_failover_bench.sh`
- `scripts/run_internode_transport_baseline.sh` (scenario matrix wrapper for local vs distributed TCP baseline artifacts)
- Criterion benches under `crates/ecstore/benches/`
These mostly cover S3/object workload or erasure coding performance. They do
not yet isolate internode transport cost.
## Required TCP Baseline
Before adding any non-TCP backend, collect a baseline for the current
TCP/HTTP/gRPC implementation.
### Topology
Minimum:
- 1-node local erasure deployment, to measure local disk and erasure overhead.
- 4-node distributed erasure deployment, to measure internode overhead.
Preferred:
- Same host count and disk layout for every run.
- Dedicated network interface or isolated VLAN.
- Fixed CPU governor and no unrelated background load.
- Recorded kernel version, NIC model, MTU, RustFS commit, Rust toolchain, and
benchmark tool versions.
### Workloads
| Workload | Sizes | Concurrency | Main signal |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| S3 PUT | 4 KiB, 1 MiB, 16 MiB, 128 MiB, 1 GiB | 1, 16, 64, 128 | End-to-end write throughput and tail latency. |
| S3 GET | 4 KiB, 1 MiB, 16 MiB, 128 MiB, 1 GiB | 1, 16, 64, 128 | End-to-end read throughput and tail latency. |
| Remote disk stream read | shard-sized ranges from `read_file_stream` | 1, 16, 64 | Isolated internode read path. |
| Remote disk stream write | shard-sized writes through `put_file_stream` | 1, 16, 64 | Isolated internode write path. |
| Healing / repair | missing disk or missing shard scenario | controlled | Rebuild throughput and read/write amplification. |
| Scanner walk | large bucket/object namespace | controlled | Metadata streaming pressure, not primary RDMA target. |
### Measurements
Collect:
- throughput in bytes/s and objects/s
- p50, p95, p99, and max latency
- CPU utilization per process and per core
- memory RSS and allocation pressure where available
- `rustfs_system_network_internode_*` metrics
- TCP retransmits, socket errors, and NIC throughput
- disk throughput and utilization
- failure/retry/fallback counts
The baseline should produce a machine-readable artifact, for example
`target/bench/internode-transport/<timestamp>/summary.csv`, plus the exact
commands and configuration used.
### Baseline runner entry point
Use `scripts/run_internode_transport_baseline.sh` to execute a reproducible
S3 PUT/GET matrix against `local` and `distributed` scenarios and export:
- `summary.csv` (throughput/latency summary per workload and object size)
- `internode_metric_deltas.csv` (operation-level internode metric deltas when
`--metrics-url` is provided)
## Transport Abstraction Proposal
### Design principle
Keep `NodeService` as the control plane. Introduce a separate data transport
only below `RemoteDisk`, where remote disk byte streams are opened today.
The first implementation should be a no-behavior-change TCP/HTTP backend that
wraps the current `HttpReader`, `HttpWriter`, and `/rustfs/rpc/*` handlers.
Only after that wrapper is benchmarked should an experimental RDMA/RoCE backend
be considered.
### Candidate boundary
The current boundary is remote disk stream transfer:
```rust
#[async_trait::async_trait]
pub trait InternodeDataTransport: Send + Sync + std::fmt::Debug {
async fn open_read(&self, request: ReadStreamRequest) -> Result<FileReader>;
async fn open_write(&self, request: WriteStreamRequest) -> Result<FileWriter>;
async fn open_walk_dir(&self, request: WalkDirStreamRequest) -> Result<FileReader>;
fn name(&self) -> &'static str;
fn capabilities(&self) -> InternodeDataTransportCapabilities;
}
```
Initial request fields should mirror the current HTTP query parameters:
- peer endpoint
- disk reference
- volume
- path
- offset
- length
- append/create mode
- expected size
- optional stall timeout for long-running listing streams
The initial TCP backend can keep the current signed HTTP URLs internally.
### Integration point
`RemoteDisk` delegates only these methods to the data transport:
- `read_file_stream`
- `read_file_zero_copy` as a wrapper over `read_file_stream` unless the backend
supports a stronger zero-copy API
- `append_file`
- `create_file`
- `walk_dir`
All other `RemoteDisk` methods continue using the current gRPC client
until measurements prove otherwise.
### Capability model
Avoid hard-coding RDMA assumptions into the generic interface. Use capabilities:
- stream read
- stream write
- bounded range read
- bidirectional streaming
- registered memory support
- scatter/gather support
- zero-copy receive into caller-owned buffers
- authenticated out-of-band transfer
- transport fallback support
The first TCP backend should report only capabilities that it actually provides.
## TCP Fallback Requirements
TCP/HTTP/gRPC must remain the default and required backend.
Fallback rules:
- If no explicit data transport is configured, use the current TCP/HTTP
implementation.
- The current accepted values for `RUSTFS_INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT` are
`tcp-http` and the `tcp` alias. Empty and unset values use `tcp-http`.
- Invalid configured values fail closed with an error that includes the env var
name and invalid value.
- If a future experimental backend fails initialization, either fail fast with a
clear error or fall back to TCP only when the configured policy allows
fallback.
- Runtime fallback must preserve object correctness and quorum semantics.
- Fallback events must be logged and counted in metrics.
- CI and local development must not require RDMA-capable hardware.
Suggested future configuration shape:
```text
RUSTFS_INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT=tcp-http
RUSTFS_INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT_FALLBACK=tcp
```
Do not add fallback settings until there is an implementation PR that uses them.
## Baseline Validation Commands
Dry-run command:
```bash
scripts/run_internode_transport_baseline.sh \
--access-key minioadmin \
--secret-key minioadmin \
--scenarios local=http://127.0.0.1:9000,distributed=http://127.0.0.1:9001 \
--sizes 4KiB,1MiB \
--concurrencies 1 \
--duration 10s \
--dry-run
```
Real TCP baseline command with metrics:
```bash
RUSTFS_INTERNODE_DATA_TRANSPORT=tcp-http \
scripts/run_internode_transport_baseline.sh \
--access-key "$RUSTFS_ACCESS_KEY" \
--secret-key "$RUSTFS_SECRET_KEY" \
--scenarios local=http://127.0.0.1:9000,distributed=http://127.0.0.1:9001 \
--metrics-url http://127.0.0.1:9000/metrics \
--out-dir target/bench/internode-transport/manual-run
```
Expected artifacts:
- `run_manifest.txt`
- `summary.csv`
- `internode_metric_deltas.csv` when `--metrics-url` is provided
The baseline validates the default TCP/HTTP path only. It must not be used to
claim RDMA, RoCE, or InfiniBand support.
## Future RDMA/RoCE/InfiniBand Boundary
A future RDMA backend should be experimental and feature-gated. It should be
designed as an optional data-plane backend, not as a replacement for the gRPC
control plane.
A future non-TCP backend would need an explicit design for:
- peer capability discovery over the existing gRPC control plane
- connection management and health mapping into existing disk fault handling
- memory registration lifecycle and registration cache
- buffer ownership, pinning, alignment, and lifetime rules
- scatter/gather behavior for erasure shards
- authentication and authorization for out-of-band data transfers
- encryption/TLS-equivalent story or a documented deployment boundary
- timeout, cancellation, retry, and fallback behavior
- metrics for registration cost, transfer latency, bytes, queue depth, retries,
fallback, and errors
- hardware and kernel compatibility matrix
`walk_dir`, metadata RPCs, locks, admin RPCs, and bucket coordination remain
outside the current data-plane boundary.
## DPU, DOCA, DPDK, SPDK, and SmartNIC Notes
These technologies should not drive the first abstraction:
- DPU/BlueField/DOCA may become relevant for TLS, checksum, compression, or
storage/network offload, but they are vendor- and deployment-specific.
- DPDK is a poor first fit because RustFS is currently an HTTP/S3 object store
and does not have a custom packet data plane.
- SPDK may be relevant only if RustFS adds a raw block or NVMe-oriented local
storage backend. The current disk model is filesystem-based.
- SmartNIC offload is outside the current boundary because this RFC does not
establish a CPU-offload bottleneck.