Replace stale dependency-depth and line-count snapshots with a domain overview based on the current Cargo workspace. This preserves the high-level architecture while avoiding references to removed crates and fragile size estimates. Constraint: Workspace membership changes independently of architecture documentation updates Rejected: Refresh the old numeric snapshots | they would immediately become stale again Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: Keep Cargo.toml as the source of truth for workspace membership Tested: git diff --check; scripts/check_doc_paths.sh; cargo metadata --no-deps --format-version 1 Not-tested: make pre-commit (documentation-only change)
14 KiB
ARCHITECTURE.md
Last updated: 2026-07-02 · Revision: 2
This document describes the high-level architecture of RustFS. If you want to familiarize yourself with the code base, you are in the right place!
See also CONTRIBUTING.md for development workflow. See also docs/architecture for active architecture migration guardrails.
Bird's Eye View
RustFS is a high-performance, S3-compatible distributed object storage system written in Rust. It uses erasure coding for data durability, supports multi-tenancy through IAM/STS, and provides a web-based admin console.
A running RustFS node exposes:
- S3 API (port 9000) — the primary data path for object CRUD
- Admin API (port 9000,
/minio/prefix) — cluster management, IAM, metrics - Console (port 9001) — web UI backed by the Admin API
- Inter-node RPC (gRPC/tonic) — cluster communication for distributed mode
The core data flow for a PUT request looks like:
HTTP request
→ server (TLS, auth, routing, compression)
→ app/object_usecase (validation, policy, lifecycle)
→ storage/ecfs (erasure coding, encryption, checksums)
→ ecstore (disk pool selection, data distribution)
→ rio (reader pipeline: encrypt → compress → hash → write)
→ io-core (zero-copy I/O, buffer pool, direct I/O)
→ local disk / remote disk via RPC
Code Map
The repository is a Cargo workspace with a flat crates/ layout:
rustfs/ # Workspace root (virtual manifest)
├── rustfs/ # Main binary + library crate
│ └── src/
│ ├── main.rs # Entry point, startup sequence
│ ├── lib.rs # Module tree root
│ ├── server/ # HTTP server, TLS, routing, middleware
│ ├── admin/ # Admin API handlers and console
│ ├── app/ # Use-case layer (object, bucket, multipart)
│ ├── storage/ # Storage engine interface and implementation
│ ├── auth.rs # S3 request authentication
│ ├── config/ # CLI args, config parsing, workload profiles
│ └── ...
├── crates/ # library crates (authoritative list: Cargo.toml [workspace].members)
│ ├── ecstore/ # Erasure-coded storage engine
│ ├── rio/ # Reader I/O pipeline (encrypt, compress, hash)
│ ├── io-core/ # Zero-copy I/O, scheduling, buffer pool
│ ├── io-metrics/ # I/O metrics collection
│ ├── common/ # Shared runtime state, globals, data usage types
│ ├── config/ # Configuration types and parsing
│ ├── utils/ # Pure utility functions
│ ├── ... # (see "Crate Reference" below)
│ └── e2e_test/ # End-to-end integration tests
└── docs/ # Design documents and analysis
Main Crate Layers (rustfs/src/)
The main crate is organized in layers, top to bottom:
| Layer | Directory | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Server | server/ |
HTTP listener, TLS, CORS, compression, middleware, graceful shutdown |
| Admin | admin/ |
Admin API routing, 30+ handler modules, web console |
| App | app/ |
Use-case orchestration: object_usecase, bucket_usecase, multipart_usecase |
| Storage | storage/ |
S3 API translation, erasure-coded FS, SSE encryption, RPC, concurrency |
| Auth | auth.rs |
S3 signature verification, credential validation |
| Config | config/ |
CLI parsing, config struct, workload profiles |
A request flows downward through the layers. No layer should reach upward (e.g., storage must not import from admin).
Crate Reference
Cargo.toml is the authoritative workspace membership and cargo tree is the
authoritative dependency graph. This overview deliberately avoids line-count
and dependency-depth snapshots because both quickly become stale during
refactors.
By Domain
| Domain | Current workspace crates | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation | checksums, common, config, data-usage, utils |
Shared configuration, data-usage models, utilities, and checksums. |
| I/O and storage | concurrency, ecstore, filemeta, heal, io-core, io-metrics, lifecycle, lock, object-capacity, object-data-cache, replication, rio, rio-v2, scanner, storage-api |
Erasure-coded object storage, metadata, recovery, lifecycle, replication, locking, cache, and I/O pipelines. |
| Security and identity | credentials, crypto, iam, keystone, kms, policy, security-governance, signer, tls-runtime, trusted-proxies |
Credentials, authentication, authorization, encryption, key management, TLS, and security contracts. |
| Protocols and contracts | extension-schema, madmin, protos, protocols, s3-ops, s3-types, s3select-api, s3select-query |
Admin, inter-node, S3, S3 Select, and optional protocol contracts. |
| Operations and integration | audit, notify, obs, targets, zip |
Auditing, observability, event delivery, notification targets, and archive support. |
| Test support | e2e_test, test-utils |
End-to-end validation and shared test bootstrap utilities. |
The rustfs binary crate composes these libraries into the running server.
ecstore remains the storage engine at the architectural center; its internal
module split is tracked under docs/architecture/.
Architecture Invariants
These are rules that the codebase should follow. Some are currently violated (marked with ⚠️). Documenting them here makes the violations explicit and trackable.
-
Layers flow downward. Server → Admin/App → Storage → ecstore → rio/io-core. No upward imports.
-
Leaf crates have zero internal dependencies.
config,credentials,crypto,io-metrics, andmadminshould depend only on external crates.- ✅ RESOLVED: the historical
utils → configandcommon → filemeta/madminedges were removed; do not reintroduce them (see Known Structural Issues).
- ✅ RESOLVED: the historical
-
Each type has exactly one definition. Types shared across crates must be defined in one crate and re-exported or imported by others.
- ⚠️ VIOLATED:
ReplicationStats(4 copies),LastMinuteLatency(3 copies),BackpressureConfig(3 copies),DataUsageInfo(2 copies).
- ⚠️ VIOLATED:
-
ecstore does not know about HTTP or S3 protocol details. It operates on storage-level abstractions (objects, buckets, disks, pools).
-
The
rustfsbinary crate is the only place that wires everything together. Individual crates should be testable in isolation. -
Error types use
thiserrorwith descriptive names (e.g.,StorageError, not bareError).- ⚠️ VIOLATED: 6 crates use
pub enum Error; 2 crates usesnafu;healuseanyhowin library code.
- ⚠️ VIOLATED: 6 crates use
Known Structural Issues
This section documents known problems in the current architecture. It exists so the team can track and address them deliberately.
Critical
-
common/scanner code duplication (~3K lines).
scannerdepends oncommonbut maintains its own copies ofDataUsageInfo,LastMinuteLatency, and related types instead of importing them. -
ecstore is a monolith (87K lines, 163 files). It contains disk management, bucket management, erasure coding, replication, lifecycle, RPC, and configuration — all in one crate. It should be decomposed along its existing subdirectories.
High
-
Dependency inversions. Historical
utils → configandcommon → filemeta/madminedges must stay removed so leaf/helper crates do not regain upward dependencies. -
Three-layer BackpressureConfig/DeadlockConfig duplication across io-core, concurrency, and
rustfs/src/storage. Storage policies now expose and consume explicit projections into the concurrency/io-core policy shapes, and workload admission snapshots are composed through provider registries; later work should use those bridges before deleting compatibility wrappers.
Medium
-
Inconsistent error handling. Three strategies (thiserror/snafu/anyhow) and mixed naming (bare
Errorvs descriptive names). -
Ambiguous common vs utils boundary. Both described as "utilities and data structures." Need clear ownership rules.
Cross-Cutting Concerns
Error Handling
The project convention is thiserror for typed errors with descriptive names.
See AGENTS.md: "Prefer thiserror for library-facing error types."
// GOOD
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub enum StorageError {
#[error("disk not found: {0}")]
DiskNotFound(String),
}
// AVOID
pub enum Error { ... } // too generic
anyhow::Result<T> // in library code (OK in tests/CLI)
Logging & Tracing
- Use
tracingcrate (info!,warn!,error!,debug!,trace!) - Structured fields:
tracing::info!(bucket = %name, "created bucket") - Spans for request-scoped context
Metrics
- Prometheus-style metrics via
rustfs-obsruntime and schema - I/O-specific counters via
rustfs-io-metrics - Registration happens at crate level, collection/reporting in
rustfs-obs
Testing
- Unit tests:
#[cfg(test)] mod testsin the same file - Integration tests: inside respective crates (not top-level
tests/) - E2E tests:
crates/e2e_test/— tests against a running server - Run all:
make testorcargo nextest run
Startup Sequence
The binary (main.rs) boots in this order:
- Environment variable compatibility (
MINIO_*→RUSTFS_*) - Tokio runtime construction
- CLI argument parsing
- License, observability, TLS, trusted proxies initialization
- Config parsing, server address resolution
- Credentials, endpoints, local disks, lock client initialization
- Capacity management initialization
- HTTP server start (S3 API + optional console)
- ECStore initialization (erasure coding storage engine)
- Global config, background replication, KMS
- Optional: FTP/FTPS/WebDAV servers
- Event notifier, audit system, deadlock detector
- Bucket metadata, IAM, Keystone, OIDC
- Scanner and heal manager
- Metrics system, mark
FullReady - Wait for shutdown signal → graceful shutdown
Dependency Diagram (Simplified)
┌─────────┐
│ rustfs │ (binary + lib, 75K lines)
│ main │
└────┬────┘
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
│ │ │
┌────▼────┐ ┌────▼────┐ ┌──────▼─────┐
│ server │ │ admin │ │ app │
│ (HTTP) │ │(console)│ │(use-cases) │
└────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ └──────┬─────┘
│ │ │
└───────────────┼───────────────┘
│
┌──────▼──────┐
│ storage │
│ (ecfs, SSE, │
│ RPC, ACL) │
└──────┬──────┘
│
┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
│ │ │
┌─────▼──────┐ ┌──────▼──────┐ ┌──────▼──────┐
│ ecstore │ │ rio │ │ io-core │
│ (87K,core) │ │ (readers) │ │ (zero-copy) │
└─────┬──────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│
┌─────┬──┼──┬─────┬──────┐
│ │ │ │ │ │
common utils config policy filemeta ...
How to Navigate
-
"Where does S3 PutObject go?"
server/routes →app/object_usecasevalidates →storage/ecfsencodes →ecstoredistributes →rioencrypts/compresses →io-corewrites -
"Where are bucket policies enforced?"
app/bucket_usecasecalls intocrates/policy/ -
"Where is replication configured?"
admin/handlers/replication.rsandadmin/handlers/site_replication.rsfor API,ecstore/src/bucket/replication/for engine -
"Where do I add a new admin endpoint?" Add handler in
admin/handlers/, register inadmin/router.rs -
"Where do I add a new metric?" Define descriptor/collector in
crates/obs/src/metrics/, expose via/minio/v2/metrics
Inspired by matklad's ARCHITECTURE.md and rust-analyzer's architecture.md.