mirror of
https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs.git
synced 2026-07-26 16:28:15 +00:00
fix(ci): widen Days=5 expiration poll window to 8*lc_interval (#4779)
Follow-up to #4772. After forcing every-cycle ILM evaluation the Days=1 plateau is reliable, but test_lifecycle_expiration / test_lifecyclev2_expiration still flaked intermittently on the *second* assertion (`assert 4 == 2`): the Days=5 (expire3) objects were not expired within their poll window. Cause: _wait_for_lifecycle_count for expire3 starts its N*lc_interval deadline only after the Days=1 poll returns (~1 debug-day in). With N=5 and lc_interval == debug_day, the 5*debug_day terms cancel and the slack past the Days=5 due time is only ~1 debug-day (~9s) -- which a single slow scanner cycle (observed ~13s spacing under CI load) can exceed, leaving the count stalled at 4. Bumping the two expire3 windows to 8*lc_interval raises the slack to ~39s, comfortably above the observed cycle jitter. Test-only, lane-scoped: does not touch RUSTFS_ILM_DEBUG_DAY_SECS or the 4*lc_interval < 5*debug_day plateau invariant. The expire3 target count (2) is terminal (nothing expires after it), so a wider window can never over-expire. Also documents the #4772 RUSTFS_DATA_USAGE_UPDATE_DIR_CYCLES=1 knob in lifecycle_behavior_tests.txt.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,9 +20,22 @@
|
||||
# RUSTFS_ILM_DEBUG_DAY_SECS=10 (1 "day" = 10s, matches s3-tests lc_debug_interval)
|
||||
# RUSTFS_SCANNER_ENABLED=true
|
||||
# RUSTFS_SCANNER_CYCLE=2 (scan every 2s, well under a debug-day)
|
||||
# RUSTFS_DATA_USAGE_UPDATE_DIR_CYCLES=1 (re-descend compacted dirs every cycle so
|
||||
# ILM is evaluated ~every 2s, not once per 16 cycles;
|
||||
# without this a Days=1 object due at 10s is not
|
||||
# expired until the next ~32s boundary — #4772)
|
||||
# RUSTFS_SCANNER_START_DELAY_SECS=0
|
||||
# RUSTFS_API_STALE_UPLOADS_CLEANUP_INTERVAL=2s (multipart abort lane)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Polling windows (patches/0002): each assertion polls list_objects until the
|
||||
# expected count is reached or a N*lc_interval deadline elapses. The Days=5
|
||||
# (expire3) window uses 8*lc_interval rather than 5: its deadline only starts
|
||||
# after the Days=1 poll returns (~1 debug-day in), so a 5*lc_interval window left
|
||||
# only ~1 debug-day of slack past the Days=5 due time — a single slow scanner
|
||||
# cycle (observed ~13s under CI load) could push the expiry just past it and
|
||||
# stall the count at 4 (assert 4 == 2). 8*lc_interval restores comfortable slack;
|
||||
# the target count (2) is terminal so a wider window never over-expires.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Point run.sh at this file with IMPLEMENTED_TESTS_FILE=<this path>.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# First batch (ilm-10). Each entry was verified against the pinned upstream source
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ index bf2f2b1..f3ef394 100644
|
||||
+ keep2_objects = client.list_objects(Bucket=bucket_name).get('Contents', [])
|
||||
+ expire3_objects = _wait_for_lifecycle_count(
|
||||
+ lambda: client.list_objects(Bucket=bucket_name).get('Contents', []),
|
||||
+ 2, 5*lc_interval)
|
||||
+ 2, 8*lc_interval)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(init_objects) == 6
|
||||
assert len(expire1_objects) == 4
|
||||
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ index bf2f2b1..f3ef394 100644
|
||||
+ keep2_objects = client.list_objects_v2(Bucket=bucket_name).get('Contents', [])
|
||||
+ expire3_objects = _wait_for_lifecycle_count(
|
||||
+ lambda: client.list_objects_v2(Bucket=bucket_name).get('Contents', []),
|
||||
+ 2, 5*lc_interval)
|
||||
+ 2, 8*lc_interval)
|
||||
|
||||
assert len(init_objects) == 6
|
||||
assert len(expire1_objects) == 4
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user