test(ilm): stabilize async scope conflict coverage

This commit is contained in:
overtrue
2026-08-01 10:33:27 +08:00
parent f5c4627057
commit 7312c99853
+18 -46
View File
@@ -382,7 +382,6 @@ struct ManualTransitionRunReport {
skipped_delete_marker: u64,
skipped_directory: u64,
skipped_replication: u64,
skipped_already_transitioned: u64,
skipped_already_in_flight: u64,
skipped_queue_full: u64,
skipped_queue_closed: u64,
@@ -408,41 +407,6 @@ fn assert_completed_or_in_flight_partial(state: &str, report: &ManualTransitionR
}
}
fn assert_conflict_winner_report(state: &str, report: &ManualTransitionRunReport, expected_objects: u64, context: &str) {
assert_completed_or_in_flight_partial(state, report, context);
if report.skipped_already_in_flight > 0 {
assert!(
report.scanned <= expected_objects,
"{context}: scanned more objects than the conflict scope contains: {report:#?}"
);
assert!(
report.eligible <= expected_objects,
"{context}: marked more objects eligible than the conflict scope contains: {report:#?}"
);
assert_eq!(
report.enqueued + report.skipped_already_in_flight,
report.eligible,
"{context}: partial in-flight accounting must cover every eligible object: {report:#?}"
);
} else {
assert_eq!(report.scanned, expected_objects, "{context}: {report:#?}");
assert_eq!(
report.eligible + report.skipped_already_transitioned,
expected_objects,
"{context}: {report:#?}"
);
assert_eq!(
report.enqueued + report.skipped_already_in_flight,
expected_objects,
"{context}: {report:#?}"
);
}
assert_eq!(
report.transition_completed, report.enqueued,
"{context}: winner must wait for all queued transitions: {report:#?}"
);
}
#[derive(Debug, Deserialize)]
struct ManualTransitionQueueSnapshot {
queue_capacity: u64,
@@ -1276,8 +1240,15 @@ async fn test_manual_transition_async_scope_conflicts_report_active_job() -> Tes
cold_client.create_bucket().bucket(TIER_BUCKET).send().await?;
let mut hot = RustFSTestEnvironment::new().await?;
hot.start_rustfs_server_with_env(vec![], &[("RUSTFS_SCANNER_ENABLED", "false"), ("RUSTFS_SCANNER_CYCLE", "3600")])
.await?;
hot.start_rustfs_server_with_env(
vec![],
&[
("RUSTFS_SCANNER_ENABLED", "false"),
("RUSTFS_SCANNER_CYCLE", "3600"),
(MANUAL_TRANSITION_CANCEL_BARRIER_ENV, "1"),
],
)
.await?;
let hot_client = hot.create_s3_client();
add_rustfs_tier(&hot, &cold).await?;
@@ -1347,20 +1318,21 @@ async fn test_manual_transition_async_scope_conflicts_report_active_job() -> Tes
assert_eq!(conflict.cancel_endpoint, status_endpoint);
assert!(!conflict.scope_key.is_empty());
manual_transition_job_cancel(&hot, cancel_endpoint).await?;
let terminal = wait_for_manual_transition_job_terminal(&hot, status_endpoint, MANUAL_ASYNC_CONFLICT_TERMINAL_TIMEOUT).await?;
assert_eq!(terminal.job_id, job_id);
assert_eq!(terminal.status, "cancelled", "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert!(!terminal.report.dry_run);
assert_eq!(terminal.report.bucket, MANUAL_ASYNC_CONFLICT_BUCKET);
assert_eq!(terminal.report.prefix, accepted.report.prefix);
assert_conflict_winner_report(
&terminal.status,
&terminal.report,
MANUAL_ASYNC_CONFLICT_OBJECTS as u64,
"terminal conflict winner response",
assert!(terminal.report.cancelled, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert_eq!(terminal.report.scanned, 0, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert_eq!(terminal.report.enqueued, 0, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert_eq!(
terminal.report.transition_completed, 0,
"terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}"
);
assert_eq!(terminal.report.dry_run_eligible, 0, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert_eq!(terminal.report.transition_failed, 0, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
assert_eq!(terminal.report.tier_failure, 0, "terminal conflict winner response: {terminal:#?}");
let after_remote_count = cold_tier_object_count(&cold_client).await?;
assert!(after_remote_count >= before_remote_count);
assert!(after_remote_count <= before_remote_count + MANUAL_ASYNC_CONFLICT_OBJECTS);