docs(skill): unwrap prose lines and add semver.org references (#4918)

Remove hard line wrapping from rustfs-release-publish prose (one logical line per sentence/paragraph, soft wrap for display) and link SemVer 2.0.0 spec including spec item 11 for prerelease precedence.
This commit is contained in:
Zhengchao An
2026-07-16 22:54:28 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 1305f7590d
commit 2ae2081753
+30 -87
View File
@@ -4,9 +4,7 @@ description: "End-to-end RustFS release pipeline: cut a preview tag first, verif
---
# RustFS Release Publish (preview-validated pipeline)
This skill orchestrates a full release. It wraps `rustfs-release-version-bump`
(which only edits version files and opens the PR) with a mandatory
preview-tag validation loop before the final tag is published.
This skill orchestrates a full release. It wraps `rustfs-release-version-bump` (which only edits version files and opens the PR) with a mandatory preview-tag validation loop before the final tag is published.
Pipeline shape:
@@ -21,62 +19,33 @@ bump to <target>-preview.N -> merge -> tag preview -> CI green
## Required inputs
- Final target version, for example `1.0.0-beta.10`.
- Preview iteration `N` (default: next unused `-preview.N` for that target;
check with `git tag -l '<target>-preview.*'` after `git fetch --tags`).
- Preview iteration `N` (default: next unused `-preview.N` for that target; check with `git tag -l '<target>-preview.*'` after `git fetch --tags`).
If the target version is missing or ambiguous, stop and ask before doing
anything (see the semver gate below).
If the target version is missing or ambiguous, stop and ask before doing anything (see the semver gate below).
## Semver gate — confirm the target version before touching anything
Versions follow SemVer 2.0.0. Precedence reminder:
Versions follow [SemVer 2.0.0](https://semver.org/). Precedence reminder:
```
1.0.0-alpha < 1.0.0-alpha.1 < 1.0.0-beta.2 < 1.0.0-beta.11 < 1.0.0-rc.1 < 1.0.0 < 1.0.1 < 1.1.0 < 2.0.0
```
Numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically (`beta.9 < beta.10`),
not lexically. Preview tags (`<target>-preview.N`) are internal validation
tags layered on top of the target's prerelease channel — they are never
themselves a deliverable version.
Numeric prerelease identifiers compare numerically (`beta.9 < beta.10`), not lexically — see [semver.org spec item 11](https://semver.org/#spec-item-11). Preview tags (`<target>-preview.N`) are internal validation tags layered on top of the target's prerelease channel — they are never themselves a deliverable version.
Rules:
- A request like "发个版" / "release the next version" without an exact
version string is ALWAYS ambiguous. Derive the current latest tag
(`git tag --sort=-v:refname | head`), then ask the user to choose via
AskUserQuestion with concrete candidates, e.g. from `1.0.0-beta.10`:
next prerelease `1.0.0-beta.11`, promote to `1.0.0-rc.1`, promote to
stable `1.0.0`. Never guess between these — they have very different
meanings (channel promotion vs. iteration) and different CI
classification consequences.
- After a stable `X.Y.Z` exists, the next version must state which
component bumps: patch `X.Y.(Z+1)` for fixes only, minor `X.(Y+1).0`
for backward-compatible features, major `(X+1).0.0` for breaking
changes. If the user names a bump type but not a number, compute it
from the latest stable tag and echo the exact resulting version back
for confirmation.
- Echo the final confirmed version string verbatim in your first status
report; every later phase must use exactly that string. If at any point
the user's wording and the confirmed version diverge, stop and re-confirm.
- A request like "发个版" / "release the next version" without an exact version string is ALWAYS ambiguous. Derive the current latest tag (`git tag --sort=-v:refname | head`), then ask the user to choose via AskUserQuestion with concrete candidates, e.g. from `1.0.0-beta.10`: next prerelease `1.0.0-beta.11`, promote to `1.0.0-rc.1`, promote to stable `1.0.0`. Never guess between these — they have very different meanings (channel promotion vs. iteration) and different CI classification consequences.
- After a stable `X.Y.Z` exists, the next version must state which component bumps: patch `X.Y.(Z+1)` for fixes only, minor `X.(Y+1).0` for backward-compatible features, major `(X+1).0.0` for breaking changes. If the user names a bump type but not a number, compute it from the latest stable tag and echo the exact resulting version back for confirmation.
- Echo the final confirmed version string verbatim in your first status report; every later phase must use exactly that string. If at any point the user's wording and the confirmed version diverge, stop and re-confirm.
## Hard rules
- **Prerelease classification is substring-based.** `build.yml` marks a tag
as prerelease only if its name contains `alpha`, `beta`, or `rc`. A preview
of a prerelease target (`1.0.0-beta.10-preview.3`) contains `beta` and is
safe. For a **stable** target (e.g. `1.1.0`), NEVER tag `1.1.0-preview.N`
it would be treated as a stable release and overwrite `latest.json` as
stable. Use `1.1.0-rc.N` as the preview tag instead.
- **Prerelease classification is substring-based.** `build.yml` marks a tag as prerelease only if its name contains `alpha`, `beta`, or `rc`. A preview of a prerelease target (`1.0.0-beta.10-preview.3`) contains `beta` and is safe. For a **stable** target (e.g. `1.1.0`), NEVER tag `1.1.0-preview.N` — it would be treated as a stable release and overwrite `latest.json` as stable. Use `1.1.0-rc.N` as the preview tag instead.
- Tags have no `v` prefix. Always annotated: `git tag -a <tag> -m "Release <tag>"`.
- The final tag MUST point at a commit whose ancestry is exactly
`validated preview hash + final version-bump commit(s)`. Never tag current
`main` HEAD: commits merged after the preview was validated are unvalidated.
- Phases run in order; a failure in any phase blocks everything after it.
After the fix lands on main, restart from Phase 1 with `N+1` — do not
resume mid-pipeline against a stale hash.
- User-facing status updates in Chinese; commits, PR titles/bodies, and tag
messages in English. No hard-wrapping in commit messages or PR bodies.
- The final tag MUST point at a commit whose ancestry is exactly `validated preview hash + final version-bump commit(s)`. Never tag current `main` HEAD: commits merged after the preview was validated are unvalidated.
- Phases run in order; a failure in any phase blocks everything after it. After the fix lands on main, restart from Phase 1 with `N+1` — do not resume mid-pipeline against a stale hash.
- User-facing status updates in Chinese; commits, PR titles/bodies, and tag messages in English. No hard-wrapping in commit messages, PR bodies, or documentation prose — one logical line per sentence/paragraph, let soft wrap handle display.
## Phase 0 — Preflight
@@ -86,8 +55,7 @@ Rules:
## Phase 1 — Preview version bump
- Invoke the `rustfs-release-version-bump` skill with version
`<target>-preview.N`, full GitHub flow (commit/push/PR).
- Invoke the `rustfs-release-version-bump` skill with version `<target>-preview.N`, full GitHub flow (commit/push/PR).
- Get the PR merged into main. Record the resulting main commit:
```bash
@@ -95,8 +63,7 @@ git fetch origin main
PREVIEW_HASH=$(git rev-parse origin/main) # must contain the bump PR
```
`PREVIEW_HASH` is the single source of truth for the rest of the pipeline —
report it to the user and reuse it verbatim in Phases 2 and 6.
`PREVIEW_HASH` is the single source of truth for the rest of the pipeline — report it to the user and reuse it verbatim in Phases 2 and 6.
## Phase 2 — Publish the preview tag
@@ -105,25 +72,16 @@ git tag -a "<target>-preview.N" -m "Release <target>-preview.N" "$PREVIEW_HASH"
git push origin "<target>-preview.N"
```
Pushing the tag triggers `.github/workflows/build.yml` ("Build and Release");
`docker.yml` chains off it via `workflow_run`.
Pushing the tag triggers `.github/workflows/build.yml` ("Build and Release"); `docker.yml` chains off it via `workflow_run`.
## Phase 3 — CI and artifact verification
- Watch the tag build:
`gh run list --workflow build.yml --limit 5` then `gh run watch <run-id>`.
Every matrix target must succeed (linux x86_64/aarch64 × musl/gnu,
macos-aarch64, windows-x86_64) plus the release and latest.json jobs.
- Verify the GitHub release:
`gh release view "<target>-preview.N" --json isPrerelease,assets`
- Watch the tag build: `gh run list --workflow build.yml --limit 5` then `gh run watch <run-id>`. Every matrix target must succeed (linux x86_64/aarch64 × musl/gnu, macos-aarch64, windows-x86_64) plus the release and latest.json jobs.
- Verify the GitHub release: `gh release view "<target>-preview.N" --json isPrerelease,assets`
- `isPrerelease` must be `true`.
- Assets must include all 6 platform zips in both versioned
(`rustfs-<platform>-v<tag>.zip`) and `-latest` forms, plus `SHA256SUMS`,
`SHA512SUMS`, `rustfs-<tag>.sbom.cdx.json`, `rustfs-<tag>.provenance.json`.
- Verify the chained Docker run succeeded:
`gh run list --workflow docker.yml --limit 3`.
- Checksum spot-check for the platform you will run locally: download the
zip and `SHA256SUMS`, verify with `shasum -a 256 -c` (grep to one line).
- Assets must include all 6 platform zips in both versioned (`rustfs-<platform>-v<tag>.zip`) and `-latest` forms, plus `SHA256SUMS`, `SHA512SUMS`, `rustfs-<tag>.sbom.cdx.json`, `rustfs-<tag>.provenance.json`.
- Verify the chained Docker run succeeded: `gh run list --workflow docker.yml --limit 3`.
- Checksum spot-check for the platform you will run locally: download the zip and `SHA256SUMS`, verify with `shasum -a 256 -c` (grep to one line).
## Phase 4 — Run the artifact locally, verify the console
@@ -142,22 +100,15 @@ Defaults: S3 endpoint `:9000`, embedded console `:9001`.
Checks (all must pass):
- `curl -fsS http://localhost:9000/health/ready` returns ready.
- Startup log shows the embedded console being served (this was the
regression that `fix(release): require embedded console assets` guards).
- Open `http://localhost:9001` in the browser: login with
`rustfsadmin`/`rustfsadmin`; dashboard renders without JS console errors;
create a bucket, upload a file, download it back (byte-identical), delete
the object and bucket. Keep the server running for Phase 5.
- Startup log shows the embedded console being served (this was the regression that `fix(release): require embedded console assets` guards).
- Open `http://localhost:9001` in the browser: login with `rustfsadmin`/`rustfsadmin`; dashboard renders without JS console errors; create a bucket, upload a file, download it back (byte-identical), delete the object and bucket. Keep the server running for Phase 5.
## Phase 5 — Validate with the latest rc client
`rc` is the RustFS CLI client from <https://github.com/rustfs/cli>.
- Ensure the latest release is installed: compare `rc --version` against
`gh api repos/rustfs/cli/releases/latest --jq .tag_name`; update via
`brew upgrade rustfs/tap/rc` (or download the release binary).
- Point it at the preview server and run the command matrix, recording
PASS/FAIL per command:
- Ensure the latest release is installed: compare `rc --version` against `gh api repos/rustfs/cli/releases/latest --jq .tag_name`; update via `brew upgrade rustfs/tap/rc` (or download the release binary).
- Point it at the preview server and run the command matrix, recording PASS/FAIL per command:
```bash
rc alias set preview http://localhost:9000 rustfsadmin rustfsadmin
@@ -178,8 +129,7 @@ rc admin user remove preview/ relcheckuser
rc alias remove preview
```
- Any FAIL blocks the release. Afterwards stop the server and delete the
scratch data directory.
- Any FAIL blocks the release. Afterwards stop the server and delete the scratch data directory.
## Phase 6 — Final version bump from the validated hash
@@ -187,11 +137,8 @@ rc alias remove preview
git checkout -b release/<target> "$PREVIEW_HASH" # NOT origin/main
```
- Invoke `rustfs-release-version-bump` with the final `<target>` on this
branch (commit/push/PR). Its verification gate (`make pre-commit` etc.)
must pass; the PR's CI must be green before proceeding.
- Do not rebase this branch onto main and do not merge main into it —
that would reintroduce unvalidated commits under the final tag.
- Invoke `rustfs-release-version-bump` with the final `<target>` on this branch (commit/push/PR). Its verification gate (`make pre-commit` etc.) must pass; the PR's CI must be green before proceeding.
- Do not rebase this branch onto main and do not merge main into it — that would reintroduce unvalidated commits under the final tag.
## Phase 7 — Publish the final tag
@@ -202,17 +149,13 @@ git tag -a "<target>" -m "Release <target>" "$FINAL_HASH"
git push origin "<target>"
```
- Re-run the Phase 3 verification against the final tag (for a stable
target, `isPrerelease` must now be `false`).
- Merge the bump PR into main afterwards so main records the version. With
squash-merge, main's copy of the bump differs from the tagged commit —
that is expected and fine.
- Re-run the Phase 3 verification against the final tag (for a stable target, `isPrerelease` must now be `false`).
- Merge the bump PR into main afterwards so main records the version. With squash-merge, main's copy of the bump differs from the tagged commit — that is expected and fine.
## Output contract
Always report:
- Target version, preview tag(s) used, `PREVIEW_HASH`, `FINAL_HASH`.
- Per-phase result (PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED) with key evidence: CI run URLs,
release URLs, console check results, the rc command matrix.
- Per-phase result (PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED) with key evidence: CI run URLs, release URLs, console check results, the rc command matrix.
- Any deviation from this pipeline and why the user approved it.