mirror of
https://github.com/deuxfleurs-org/garage.git
synced 2026-07-26 07:58:14 +00:00
updated instructions about metadata engines and snapshots
This commit is contained in:
@@ -161,4 +161,7 @@ your recovery options are as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Option 3: restoring a filesystem-level snapshot.** If you are using ZFS or
|
||||
BTRFS to snapshot your metadata partition, refer to their specific
|
||||
documentation on rolling back or copying files from an old snapshot.
|
||||
documentation on rolling back or copying files from an old snapshot.
|
||||
Note that, depending on the properties of the filesystem and of the DB engine,
|
||||
if these snapshots were taken during a write operation to the database, they may
|
||||
also be corrupted and thus unfit for recovery.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -346,8 +346,16 @@ old Sled metadata databases to another engine.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance characteristics of the different DB engines are as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
- **LMDB:** the recommended database engine for high-performance distributed clusters.
|
||||
LMDB works very well, but is known to have the following limitations:
|
||||
- **LMDB:** the recommended database engine for high-performance distributed clusters
|
||||
with `replication_factor` ≥ 2.
|
||||
LMDB works well, but is known to have the following limitations:
|
||||
|
||||
- LMDB is prone to database corruption after an unclean shutdown (e.g. a process kill
|
||||
or a power outage). It is recommended to configure
|
||||
[`metadata_auto_snapshot_interval`](#metadata_auto_snapshot_interval) to be
|
||||
able to easily recover from this situation. With `replication_factor` ≥ 2,
|
||||
metadata can also be reconstructed from remote nodes upon corruption
|
||||
(see [Recovering from failures](@/documentation/operations/recovering.md#corrupted_meta)).
|
||||
|
||||
- The data format of LMDB is not portable between architectures, so for
|
||||
instance the Garage database of an x86-64 node cannot be moved to an ARM64
|
||||
@@ -357,22 +365,13 @@ LMDB works very well, but is known to have the following limitations:
|
||||
node to very small database sizes due to how LMDB works; it is therefore
|
||||
not recommended.
|
||||
|
||||
- Several users have reported corrupted LMDB database files after an unclean
|
||||
shutdown (e.g. a power outage). This situation can generally be recovered
|
||||
from if your cluster is geo-replicated (by rebuilding your metadata db from
|
||||
other nodes), or if you have saved regular snapshots at the filesystem
|
||||
level.
|
||||
|
||||
- Keys in LMDB are limited to 511 bytes. This limit translates to limits on
|
||||
object keys in S3 and sort keys in K2V that are limted to 479 bytes.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sqlite:** Garage supports Sqlite as an alternative storage backend for
|
||||
metadata, which does not have the issues listed above for LMDB.
|
||||
On versions 0.8.x and earlier, Sqlite should be avoided due to abysmal
|
||||
performance, which was fixed with the addition of `metadata_fsync`.
|
||||
Sqlite is still probably slower than LMDB due to the way we use it,
|
||||
so it is not the best choice for high-performance storage clusters,
|
||||
but it should work fine in many cases.
|
||||
metadata, which does not have the issues listed above for LMDB. Sqlite is
|
||||
slower than LMDB, so it is not the best choice for high-performance storage
|
||||
clusters.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Fjall:** a storage engine based on LSM trees, which theoretically allow for
|
||||
higher write throughput than other storage engines that are based on B-trees.
|
||||
@@ -382,7 +381,6 @@ LMDB works very well, but is known to have the following limitations:
|
||||
test data, and report any issues to our bug tracker. Do not use it for
|
||||
production workloads.**
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to convert Garage's metadata directory from one format to another
|
||||
using the `garage convert-db` command, which should be used as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -440,7 +438,8 @@ if geographical replication is used.
|
||||
#### `metadata_auto_snapshot_interval` (since `v0.9.4`) {#metadata_auto_snapshot_interval}
|
||||
|
||||
If this value is set, Garage will automatically take a snapshot of the metadata
|
||||
DB file at a regular interval and save it in the metadata directory.
|
||||
DB file at a regular interval and save it in the metadata directory,
|
||||
or in [`metadata_snapshots_dir`](#metadata_snapshots_dir) if it is set.
|
||||
This parameter can take any duration string that can be parsed by
|
||||
the [`parse_duration`](https://docs.rs/parse_duration/latest/parse_duration/#syntax) crate.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -449,14 +448,19 @@ corrupted, for instance after an unclean shutdown. See [this
|
||||
page](@/documentation/operations/recovering.md#corrupted_meta) for details.
|
||||
Garage keeps only the two most recent snapshots of the metadata DB and deletes
|
||||
older ones automatically.
|
||||
You can also create metadata snapshots manually at any point using the
|
||||
`garage meta snapshot` command.
|
||||
|
||||
Using snapshots created by Garage is the best option to make snapshots of your
|
||||
node's metadata for potential recovery, as they are guaranteed to be clean and
|
||||
consistent, contrarily to filesystem-level snapshots that may be taken while
|
||||
some writes are in-flight and thus might be corrupted.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that taking a metadata snapshot is a relatively intensive operation as the
|
||||
entire data file is copied. A snapshot being taken might have performance
|
||||
impacts on the Garage node while it is running. If the cluster is under heavy
|
||||
write load when a snapshot operation is running, this might also cause the
|
||||
database file to grow in size significantly as pages cannot be recycled easily.
|
||||
For this reason, it might be better to use filesystem-level snapshots instead
|
||||
if possible.
|
||||
|
||||
#### `disable_scrub` {#disable_scrub}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user