Files
certctl/docs/reference/connectors/ssh.md
T
shankar0123 7c134d0575 docs: retire compliance subtree + sweep framework name-drops from prose
Per operator decision the framework-mapping docs are gone. They
were aspirational (no audit, no certification, no validated
mapping); keeping them around was misleading.

Files deleted (1,883 lines):
- docs/compliance/index.md
- docs/compliance/soc2.md
- docs/compliance/pci-dss.md
- docs/compliance/nist-sp-800-57.md

Hyperlinks removed:
- README.md: 'Auditor / compliance' row in the doc table; the
  '(compliance mapping included)' parenthetical in the
  positioning paragraph
- docs/README.md: the '## Compliance' section table; the
  'Auditor / compliance team' reading-order-by-role row

Prose name-drops swept across 24 files:
- README.md: 'FedRAMP boundary CAs / financial-services policy
  CAs' → '4-level boundary CAs / 3-level policy CAs';
  'Compliance-grade for PCI-DSS Level 1, FedRAMP Moderate / High,
  SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA' → cut entirely
- getting-started/{quickstart,concepts,examples,why-certctl,
  advanced-demo}.md: 'compliance' → 'audit' / 'policy';
  'PCI-DSS / SOC 2 / NIST SP 800-57' framework lists cut;
  ''pci': 'true'' tag example → ''environment': 'production''
- migration/cert-manager-coexistence.md: 'compliance rules' →
  'policy rules'
- operator/approval-workflow.md: 'Compliance customers (PCI-DSS
  Level 1, FedRAMP Moderate / High, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA)' →
  'Operators'; entire 'Compliance control mapping' table
  (PCI-DSS §6.4.5 / NIST SP 800-53 SA-15 / SOC 2 Type II CC6.1
  / HIPAA §164.308(a)(4)) deleted; 'compliance contract' →
  'two-person-integrity contract'; 'compliance auditors' →
  'reviewers'
- operator/legacy-clients-tls-1.2.md: 'PCI-DSS v4.0 Req 4 §2.2.5'
  audit-reference → CWE-326 (kept); 'PCI-DSS Req 4 §2.2.5
  attestation' section retitled to 'TLS posture summary' and
  rewritten without framework framing; 'PCI-DSS, NIST, and
  major browsers will eventually deprecate TLS 1.2' →
  'Major browsers and OS vendors will eventually deprecate
  TLS 1.2'
- operator/database-tls.md: PCI-DSS Req 4 §2.2.5 audit-ref →
  CWE-319 only; 'PCI-DSS scope' → 'sensitive data'; PCI-DSS
  Req 4 v4.0 prose footing → cut
- operator/runbooks/disaster-recovery.md: 'SOC 2 / PCI
  procurement-team deliverable' → 'on-call deliverable';
  'compliance auditors' → 'reviewers'
- reference/connectors/{acme,aws-acm,azure-kv,globalsign,
  local-ca,openssl,ssh,index}.md: 'compliance reporting
  (PCI-DSS §3.6, HIPAA §164.312)' → 'audit reporting';
  'Compliance environments (PCI-DSS Level 1, FedRAMP High,
  HIPAA)' → 'Regulated environments'; 'compliance audits' →
  'audit'; 'FedRAMP boundary CA' pattern names →
  '4-level boundary CA' (technically descriptive)
- reference/protocols/est.md: 'compliance-hook seam' →
  'device-state hook seam'; 'compliance gating' → 'device-state
  gating'; 'est_compliance_failed' → 'est_device_state_failed'
- reference/protocols/scep-intune.md: 'Optional compliance
  check' → 'Optional device-state check'; failure-counter
  'compliance_failed' → 'device_state_failed'; 'Conditional
  Access compliance gating' → 'Conditional Access
  device-state gating'
- reference/intermediate-ca-hierarchy.md: 'FedRAMP boundary-CA
  deployments where the regulator requires...' →
  'Boundary-CA deployments where you want separation of policy
  and issuing authorities'; pattern A retitled '4-level FedRAMP
  boundary CA' → '4-level boundary CA'
- reference/architecture.md: broken Related-docs link to
  compliance.md removed; the rest of that block had stale
  pre-Phase-2 paths (quickstart.md, demo-advanced.md,
  connectors.md, openapi.md, testing-guide.md, test-env.md) —
  retargeted to current locations
- reference/deployment-model.md: 'SOC 2 evidence-report
  generator' → 'Audit-evidence report generator'
- reference/vendor-matrix.md: 'SOC 2 / PCI auditors paste this
  into evidence packs' → 'reviewers paste this into
  vendor-evaluation packs'
- contributor/qa-test-suite.md: 'compliance exist' coverage
  description cut; 'Compliance (PCI / SOC2 / HIPAA-relevant)'
  risk-class label → 'Audit-relevant'

What was kept:
- CWE references (legitimate technical pointers)
- Microsoft API/feature names that happen to use 'compliance'
  literally ('Microsoft Graph compliance API',
  'device-compliance validators' — these are MS product names,
  not framework name-drops)
- 'NIST PQC' on the landing page (Post-Quantum Cryptography is
  the actual NIST standard family, not a compliance framework)

Verified: zero hyperlinks into docs/compliance/ remain. All 24
ci-guards/*.sh pass locally. qa-doc-seed-count.sh clean.
Net diff: 26 files / -1,883 deletions in compliance/ + -32 net
across the prose sweep.

Companion edits in cowork/ (CLAUDE.md doc-tree summary +
WORKSPACE-CHANGELOG.md retirement note) land separately.
2026-05-05 05:26:44 +00:00

194 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown

# SSH (Agentless) Connector — Operator Deep-Dive
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
>
> Operator-grade documentation for the SSH agentless target
> connector. For the connector-development context (interface
> contract, registry, atomic deploy primitive shared across all
> targets), see the [connector index](index.md).
## Overview
The SSH connector enables agentless certificate deployment to any
Linux/Unix server via SSH/SFTP. Instead of installing the certctl
agent binary on every target, a single "proxy agent" in the same
network zone deploys certificates to remote servers over SSH.
This is ideal for environments where installing agents on every
server is impractical — air-gapped servers, legacy fleets, or
brownfield environments where agent installation requires change-
control tickets per host.
Implementation lives at `internal/connector/target/ssh/`.
## When to use this connector
Use the SSH connector when:
- Installing the certctl agent on every target is impractical or
politically expensive.
- The agent-to-target network path is operator-controlled.
- You're deploying to known, registered infrastructure where the
operator implicitly trusts the host (you're already shipping it
a TLS cert).
Look elsewhere when:
- You're deploying across the public internet to dynamic /
multi-tenant hosts. The connector accepts any host key
(`InsecureIgnoreHostKey`); MITM resistance requires the
mitigations below.
- Your environment has strict regulatory MITM-resistance
requirements. The inline-comment "out of scope" framing on
host-key acceptance doesn't satisfy reviewers who want
documented host-key verification at the connector level.
## Configuration
### Key authentication (recommended)
```json
{
"host": "web-server.internal",
"port": 22,
"user": "certctl",
"auth_method": "key",
"private_key_path": "/home/certctl/.ssh/id_ed25519",
"cert_path": "/etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem",
"key_path": "/etc/ssl/private/key.pem",
"chain_path": "/etc/ssl/certs/chain.pem",
"reload_command": "systemctl reload nginx",
"timeout": 30
}
```
### Password authentication
```json
{
"host": "legacy-server.internal",
"user": "deploy",
"auth_method": "password",
"password": "s3cret",
"cert_path": "/etc/ssl/cert.pem",
"key_path": "/etc/ssl/key.pem",
"reload_command": "systemctl reload apache2"
}
```
### Field reference
| Field | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `host` | (required) | SSH hostname or IP address |
| `port` | 22 | SSH port |
| `user` | (required) | SSH username |
| `auth_method` | `"key"` | `"key"` or `"password"` |
| `private_key_path` | — | Path to SSH private key file (key auth) |
| `private_key` | — | Inline SSH private key PEM (alternative to path) |
| `password` | — | SSH password (password auth) |
| `passphrase` | — | Passphrase for encrypted private keys |
| `cert_path` | (required) | Remote path for certificate file |
| `key_path` | (required) | Remote path for private key file |
| `chain_path` | — | Remote path for chain file (if empty, chain appended to cert) |
| `cert_mode` | `"0644"` | File permissions for cert (octal) |
| `key_mode` | `"0600"` | File permissions for private key (octal) |
| `reload_command` | — | Command to execute after deployment |
| `timeout` | 30 | SSH connection timeout in seconds |
## Security baseline
- **Key-based authentication is recommended** over password
authentication. Encrypted private keys are supported via
`passphrase`.
- **Reload commands are validated against shell injection** (same
validation as Postfix/Dovecot connectors).
- **Host field is regex-validated** to prevent shell metacharacters.
- **Private keys are written with 0600 permissions** by default.
- **Host key verification is intentionally skipped.** See the
threat model below.
## Operator playbook: SSH host-key verification
certctl's SSH connector dials each target with
`HostKeyCallback: ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey()`, meaning **the
connector accepts any server host key without comparison against
`known_hosts`**. This is a documented design choice, not an
oversight.
### Why the connector accepts any host key
- certctl deploys to operator-configured target infrastructure.
Each target is registered explicitly in the control plane with
hostname + auth credentials + cert/key paths; the operator
implicitly trusts the host they're deploying to (otherwise why
give it a TLS cert).
- Mirrors the same posture certctl applies to the network scanner
(`InsecureSkipVerify` for cert-monitoring TLS handshakes) and
the F5 connector (`Insecure` flag for self-signed BIG-IP
management interfaces).
- Avoids a heavyweight per-target `known_hosts` management layer
that would shift complexity onto operators with no
proportional security gain when the network model is
"operator-configured infrastructure on operator-controlled
network".
### Threat model the design accepts
- A passive eavesdropper on the agent-to-target link. SSH's
transport encryption still applies — host-key acceptance
affects MITM vulnerability, not on-the-wire confidentiality.
- A MITM attacker on the agent-to-target link who can intercept
the SSH TCP handshake AND has positioned themselves on a
hostname the operator has registered as a deploy target.
Layered authentication (per-target SSH keys with strong
passphrases stored at the agent) limits the blast radius — the
MITM gets one target's cert+key payload, not the agent's
broader credentials.
### Threat model the design does NOT accept
- Deploying across the public internet to a host whose IP
rotates (e.g. ephemeral cloud instances behind a load balancer
that doesn't pin SSH host keys). In that scenario,
`InsecureIgnoreHostKey` opens an MITM window during IP
rotation — register a `known_hosts` file path or use SSH
certificates (below) instead.
- Multi-tenant networks where another tenant could plausibly
impersonate the target host. certctl's design assumes
operator-controlled network paths.
### Mitigations operators can layer on
- **`known_hosts` enforcement**: implement a custom `SSHClient`
(the connector's `SSHClient` interface accepts injected clients
via `NewWithClient`) whose `Connect` method builds an
`ssh.ClientConfig` with `HostKeyCallback` set to
`knownhosts.New("/path/to/known_hosts")` from
`golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/knownhosts`.
- **SSH certificate authentication**: use OpenSSH 5.4+ host
certificates signed by an organizational CA. Configure the
agent's `known_hosts` CA pinning via `@cert-authority` lines so
any host presenting a certificate signed by the CA is trusted,
regardless of IP rotation.
- **Network segmentation**: run the certctl agent on the same
private network segment as its targets; require VPN tunnels
for cross-network deploys; use bastion hosts with their own
host-key validation.
- **Per-target SSH keys**: rotate the agent's SSH credentials
per target so a successful MITM compromise is bounded to that
one target's cert+key, not the agent's broader credential set.
### V3-Pro forward path
The operator-managed `known_hosts` integration (config field +
`HostKeyCallback` plumbing + per-target root-of-trust enforcement)
is documented as V3-Pro work. Tracking:
`WORKSPACE-ROADMAP.md` (search for "SSH known_hosts").
## Related docs
- [Connector index](index.md) — interface contract, registry, deploy primitive
- [F5 BIG-IP](f5.md) — comparable proxy-agent target where the agent doesn't run on the appliance itself
- [Kubernetes Secrets](k8s.md) — agent-in-cluster alternative when the targets are workloads rather than VMs