Files
certctl/docs/operator/security.md
T
shankar0123 97f51cc044 docs: Phase 14 — Last reviewed line sweep across docs/
Per Phase 1 audit at cowork/docs-overhaul-phase-1-audit-2026-05-04/.
Adds a `> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05` line right after the H1 heading
of every doc that didn't already have one (41 files).

This dates the freshness clock for the future Phase 4 per-doc review.
The discipline going forward: when a doc's content gets a meaningful
edit, bump the date. When the date gets old (e.g., >6 months), the
doc earns a freshness-review pass.

Mechanical insertion via awk one-liner, applied to every docs/*.md
that didn't already match `grep -q 'Last reviewed:'`. Files that
already carried the line from earlier Phase 2 work (the navigation
index, the new connector docs, the new SCEP server / legacy-clients-
TLS-1.2 / release-verification docs, and the 5 per-connector deep
dives) were skipped to avoid duplicate insertion.

Net: every doc in docs/ now has a Last reviewed line.
2026-05-05 03:26:46 +00:00

172 lines
7.6 KiB
Markdown

# certctl Security Posture & Operator Guidance
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
This document collects the operator-facing security guidance that the source
code's per-finding comment blocks reference. Each section names the audit
finding it closes, the threat model, and the operator action required (if
any).
## OCSP responder availability
**Audit reference:** Bundle C / M-020. CWE-770 (uncontrolled resource
consumption); RFC 6960 (OCSP); RFC 7633 (Must-Staple).
certctl ships an OCSP responder at `/.well-known/pki/ocsp/{issuer_id}/{serial}`
that signs a fresh response per request. Pre-Bundle-C the unauth handler
chain had no rate limit, so an attacker could DoS the responder and force
fail-open relying parties to accept revoked certificates as valid. Bundle C
adds the same per-key rate limiter to the unauth chain that the authenticated
chain has used since Bundle B. Per-IP keying applies because OCSP traffic is
unauthenticated.
The rate limiter alone does not solve the underlying revocation-bypass risk.
**The architectural fix is for issued certificates to carry the OCSP
Must-Staple TLS Feature extension** (RFC 7633, OID 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.24). When
present, conforming TLS clients refuse to negotiate a session unless the
server staples a fresh signed OCSP response in the TLS handshake. This shifts
revocation enforcement from the client's discretion (which most fail-open by
default) to a hard requirement that the connection cannot complete without
proof of non-revocation.
### Operator action
For certificates issued to systems where revocation correctness matters:
1. **Configure the issuer profile to set `must-staple: true`.** Out-of-the-box
profiles in `migrations/seed.sql` do not set this; operators add it at
profile-creation time via the API or by editing seed data.
2. **Confirm the relying party honors the extension.** OpenSSL ≥ 1.1.0,
Firefox, and Chrome 84+ all enforce Must-Staple. Older clients silently
ignore it.
3. **Confirm the deployment target is configured for OCSP stapling** so the
server can actually deliver the stapled response in the handshake.
- **nginx:** `ssl_stapling on; ssl_stapling_verify on;`
- **Apache:** `SSLUseStapling on`
- **HAProxy:** `set ssl ocsp-response /path/to/response.der`
- **Envoy:** `ocsp_staple_policy: must_staple`
### What this does NOT cover
- **CRL fallback.** Must-Staple does not affect CRL behavior. Operators with
CRL-based relying parties should use the rate-limit + caching defense
alone; there is no client-side equivalent to Must-Staple for CRLs.
- **Self-issued certs in air-gapped networks.** When the relying party
cannot reach the OCSP responder at all (the threat model the audit
cited), Must-Staple is the only mechanism that closes the bypass. CRL
distribution similarly requires the relying party to fetch the CRL,
which is also subject to the same network-availability concern.
## Postgres transport encryption
See [docs/database-tls.md](database-tls.md). Bundle B / M-018.
## Encryption at rest
Bundle B / M-001. PBKDF2-SHA256 at 600,000 rounds (OWASP 2024 Password
Storage Cheat Sheet floor) for the operator-supplied passphrase that
derives the AES-256-GCM key for sensitive config columns. v3 blob format
with a per-ciphertext random salt; v1/v2 read fallback for legacy rows.
See [internal/crypto/encryption.go](../internal/crypto/encryption.go) and
the accompanying tests for the format spec.
## Authentication surface
Bundle B / M-002. Two layers decide auth-exempt status:
1. **Router layer:** `internal/api/router/router.go::AuthExemptRouterRoutes`
— the 4 endpoints registered via direct `r.mux.Handle` without going
through the middleware chain (`/health`, `/ready`, `/api/v1/auth/info`,
`/api/v1/version`).
2. **Dispatch layer:** `internal/api/router/router.go::AuthExemptDispatchPrefixes`
— URL-prefix routing in `cmd/server/main.go::buildFinalHandler` for
`/.well-known/pki/*`, `/.well-known/est/*`, and `/scep[/...]*`.
Both lists have AST-walking regression tests (`auth_exempt_test.go`) that
fail CI if a new bypass lands without an updating the documented constant.
## Per-user rate limiting
Bundle B / M-025. Authenticated callers are bucketed by API-key name;
unauthenticated callers (probes, OCSP relying parties, EST/SCEP enrollees)
are bucketed by source IP. `RPS` and `BurstSize` are per-key budgets.
`PerUserRPS` / `PerUserBurstSize` give authenticated clients a separate
budget when set non-zero.
## API key rotation
**Audit reference:** L-004. CWE-924 (improper enforcement of message integrity during transmission in a communication channel) — operator UX variant.
certctl's API keys are configured via the `CERTCTL_API_KEYS_NAMED` env var
(format `name1:key1,name2:key2:admin`) and parsed at startup into an
in-memory list. There is no DB-resident key store, no GUI, no `/api/v1/keys`
endpoint — the env var IS the key inventory.
Pre-Bundle-G the env var rejected duplicate names, so rotating a key
required: stop accepting OLDKEY → restart → roll NEWKEY out. Any client
polling against OLDKEY during the restart window hit a 401.
Bundle G adds a **double-key rotation window**: two entries can share a
name during the rollover, and both keys validate. Operators run the
rotation as:
1. **Generate the new key.** `openssl rand -hex 32` produces a 256-bit
value with sufficient entropy.
2. **Append the new entry to `CERTCTL_API_KEYS_NAMED`** alongside the
existing one:
```
CERTCTL_API_KEYS_NAMED="alice:OLDKEY:admin,alice:NEWKEY:admin"
```
Both entries MUST carry the same admin flag — startup fails loud if
they don't (a non-admin shouldn't share an identity with an admin).
3. **Restart certctl.** A startup INFO log confirms the rotation window
is active:
```
INFO api-key rotation window active name=alice entries=2 see=docs/security.md::api-key-rotation
```
4. **Roll the new key out to all clients.** Both keys validate during
this phase. Audit-trail actor + per-user rate-limit bucket stay
consistent across the rollover (both entries produce the same
`UserKey` context value, the shared name).
5. **Remove the old entry** from `CERTCTL_API_KEYS_NAMED`:
```
CERTCTL_API_KEYS_NAMED="alice:NEWKEY:admin"
```
6. **Restart certctl.** OLDKEY now fails with 401. Rotation complete.
The rotation window has no operator-set timeout — it lasts for as long
as both entries are in the env var. Best practice is a 24-72h window
covering a full deploy cadence; if a client hasn't rolled to NEWKEY by
the end of step 4, extend the window before step 5.
### What the contract guarantees
- Two entries with the same `name`: **allowed** if both have the same
`admin` flag.
- Two entries with the same `name` but mismatched admin: **rejected at
startup** (privilege escalation guard).
- Two entries with the same `(name, key)` pair: **rejected at startup**
(typo guard — rotation requires DIFFERENT keys under the same name).
- Single-entry steady state: unchanged from pre-Bundle-G behavior.
### What the contract does NOT do
- **No automatic expiration of OLDKEY.** The operator removes the entry
in step 5; certctl doesn't track timestamps. A future enhancement
could add a `rotated_at` annotation if operators ask for it.
- **No GUI / API for key management.** Keys are env-var only by design;
building a key-management surface is a separate feature project.
- **No revocation list.** If a key leaks, the only path is to remove it
from the env var and restart. That's appropriate for a small env-var
inventory; it would not scale to a per-user-key-issued model.
## Reporting a vulnerability
Email `certctl@proton.me`. Coordinated disclosure preferred; we will
acknowledge within 72h.