mirror of
https://github.com/shankar0123/certctl.git
synced 2026-06-07 15:01:32 +00:00
Bundle F follow-up: M-023 doc env-var cleanup (G-3 guard fix)
CI on the bundle-F merge (run #24972730564) failed the G-3 env-var docs guardrail because docs/legacy-est-scep.md mentioned CERTCTL_EST_PROXY_TRUSTED_SOURCES CERTCTL_EST_TRUST_PROXY_CLIENT_CERT_HEADER which are documented as future-feature env vars but don't exist in config.go. The G-3 guard treats any env-var name in docs that's not either defined in source OR on the documented integration-surface allowlist as drift. The runbook's 'certctl-side configuration' section was over-promising features that haven't shipped yet. Rewritten to be honest: - Current implementation is header-agnostic (X-SSL-Client-Cert is ignored). EST/SCEP authentication still works correctly because both protocols carry their own auth (CSR signature for EST, challengePassword for SCEP) inside the request body. - The reverse proxy is purely a TLS-version bridge. - Future-feature description retained in prose form (without literal env-var names) so an operator who needs proxy-supplied client identity knows to open an issue. The nginx config block's comment was also rewritten to reflect the header-agnostic default. The proxy still SETS the headers (cheap, no-op when ignored); a future commit can flip certctl to read them behind a fail-closed CIDR allowlist + opt-in toggle. Verification: grep -rnE 'CERTCTL_EST_PROXY|CERTCTL_EST_TRUST' README.md docs/ deploy/helm/ — empty (G-3 guard now passes for these names)
This commit is contained in:
+32
-22
@@ -80,10 +80,12 @@ server {
|
||||
|
||||
location ~ ^/\.well-known/(est|pki) {
|
||||
# Forward the client cert (if presented) to certctl over the
|
||||
# private hop. certctl's EST handler reads X-SSL-Client-Cert
|
||||
# only when the connection's source IP is in
|
||||
# CERTCTL_EST_PROXY_TRUSTED_SOURCES — without that allowlist
|
||||
# the header is ignored to prevent spoofing.
|
||||
# private hop. The current certctl implementation IGNORES the
|
||||
# X-SSL-Client-Cert header (header-agnostic by default — see
|
||||
# the certctl-side configuration section below). EST/SCEP
|
||||
# authentication still works correctly because both protocols
|
||||
# carry their own auth (CSR signature for EST, challengePassword
|
||||
# for SCEP) inside the request body.
|
||||
proxy_set_header X-SSL-Client-Cert $ssl_client_escaped_cert;
|
||||
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
|
||||
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
|
||||
@@ -132,26 +134,34 @@ backend certctl_backend
|
||||
|
||||
## certctl-side configuration
|
||||
|
||||
Two env vars on the certctl process control the proxy-trust contract:
|
||||
The current implementation is **header-agnostic**: certctl ignores any
|
||||
`X-SSL-Client-Cert` / `X-Forwarded-For` headers from the proxy. EST
|
||||
authentication still happens via in-protocol CSR signature + profile
|
||||
policy (RFC 7030 §3.2.3); SCEP authentication still happens via the
|
||||
`challengePassword` attribute embedded in the CSR (RFC 8894 §3.2). Both
|
||||
mechanisms are inside the request body and survive the reverse-proxy
|
||||
hop without server-side header trust.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
# Comma-separated CIDR ranges that certctl will trust to set
|
||||
# X-SSL-Client-Cert and X-Forwarded-For headers. Any other source has
|
||||
# those headers stripped before reaching the EST/SCEP handlers.
|
||||
# Default: empty (no proxy trust — header-spoofing attempt = 403).
|
||||
CERTCTL_EST_PROXY_TRUSTED_SOURCES=10.0.0.0/24
|
||||
**Why this is the correct default:** trusting a proxy-supplied header
|
||||
for client identity opens a header-spoofing attack surface that requires
|
||||
careful design (CIDR allowlist of trusted proxies, fail-closed defaults,
|
||||
explicit operator opt-in). The Bundle F closure of M-023 ships the
|
||||
TLS-bridge guidance as documentation only; a future commit can extend
|
||||
certctl with proxy-header trust if and when an operator demonstrates a
|
||||
deployment shape that requires it. Until that lands, the runbook above
|
||||
is operationally complete: legacy EST and SCEP clients continue to
|
||||
authenticate via their in-protocol mechanisms, and the reverse proxy is
|
||||
purely a TLS-version bridge.
|
||||
|
||||
# When set, the certctl EST handler treats X-SSL-Client-Cert as
|
||||
# authoritative for client identity (instead of requiring an inbound
|
||||
# mTLS handshake). MUST be paired with CERTCTL_EST_PROXY_TRUSTED_SOURCES.
|
||||
CERTCTL_EST_TRUST_PROXY_CLIENT_CERT_HEADER=true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The two-key contract is intentional: setting `TRUST_PROXY_CLIENT_CERT_HEADER`
|
||||
without a non-empty `TRUSTED_SOURCES` is rejected at startup with a
|
||||
fail-loud error. Spoofing the `X-SSL-Client-Cert` header is the obvious
|
||||
attack against this configuration and the dual-knob design forces an
|
||||
operator to think about it.
|
||||
If your deployment requires proxy-supplied client identity (e.g., the
|
||||
proxy terminates mTLS and you want certctl to record the client-cert
|
||||
subject in the audit trail beyond what the CSR carries), open an issue
|
||||
and a future commit will add a header-trust contract behind two
|
||||
fail-closed env vars: a CIDR allowlist of trusted proxies, plus an
|
||||
explicit opt-in toggle. Both knobs would be required together; setting
|
||||
only one would fail loud at startup. Until that work ships, the
|
||||
header-agnostic default described above is the only supported
|
||||
configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
## PCI-DSS Req 4 §2.2.5 attestation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user