Document Docker OFF and ON replay results

This commit is contained in:
abuckit
2026-06-14 22:33:14 -04:00
parent 15b5ea3f03
commit 4aafa83e11
@@ -2815,3 +2815,176 @@ next session should keep the existing two-host workflow, reuse
`threaded_seed.py`, and scale object count upward from `5k` once a cleaner
seed strategy is in place.
```
## 14. Ubuntu Docker 2-Node Mixed Replay: OFF vs 24h ON
This section records the later host-local Docker replay on `ubuntudell`. This
is distinct from the small local single-host runs above. It uses a 2-container
distributed Buckit cluster with host-backed data directories and a long mixed
replay against a seeded bucket.
### Rig
Environment:
```text
host: ubuntudell
cluster: 2 Buckit containers
drives per container: 4
drive size: 15G
cpu limit: 1 per container
memory limit: 2G per container
data root: /home/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-data
bucket: docker-mixed-seed
request mix: GET-heavy mixed replay with PUT and DELETE
concurrency: 5 per host
delay: random 100ms to 500ms before each request
report interval: 120s
```
The ON arm reused the same seeded data and the same exported key pools as the
OFF arm. The only intentional configuration change was:
```text
OFF: BUCKIT_FAST_GET=0
ON: BUCKIT_FAST_GET=1
```
### OFF Run
Run directory:
```text
/home/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-12h-5x2-20260613T132536Z-off-rebooted
```
Final GET summary:
```text
node1 completed: 605859
node2 completed: 604879
node1 GET count: 592624
node2 GET count: 591543
TTFB p50: node1 29.707 ms node2 29.666 ms
TTFB p90: node1 98.751 ms node2 100.982 ms
total p50: node1 32.619 ms node2 32.581 ms
total p90: node1 104.717 ms node2 107.123 ms
```
Cluster averages:
```text
TTFB p50: 29.687 ms
TTFB p90: 99.867 ms
total p50: 32.600 ms
total p90: 105.920 ms
```
The OFF arm showed no FastOpen activity, as expected.
### ON Run
Run directory:
```text
/home/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-24h-5x2-20260614T020920Z-on-rebooted-latest
```
Final GET summary:
```text
node1 completed: 1214410
node2 completed: 1212560
node1 GET count: 1187436
node2 GET count: 1185707
TTFB p50: node1 28.263 ms node2 28.243 ms
TTFB p90: node1 98.645 ms node2 100.755 ms
total p50: node1 31.140 ms node2 31.125 ms
total p90: node1 104.294 ms node2 106.797 ms
```
Cluster averages:
```text
TTFB p50: 28.253 ms
TTFB p90: 99.700 ms
total p50: 31.133 ms
total p90: 105.545 ms
```
FastOpen engagement was clean throughout the ON arm:
```text
fallbacks: effectively zero in the live windows and zero at final summary level
final errors: zero
hits: tracked GET windows closely across the full run
```
### ON vs OFF
Cluster-average GET comparison:
```text
Metric OFF ON Delta
TTFB p50 29.687 ms 28.253 ms -1.434 ms (-4.8%)
TTFB p90 99.867 ms 99.700 ms -0.167 ms (-0.2%)
total p50 32.600 ms 31.133 ms -1.468 ms (-4.5%)
total p90 105.920 ms 105.545 ms -0.374 ms (-0.4%)
```
Interpretation:
- FastOpen ON improved the median path materially in this Docker replay.
- The tail at p90 was effectively flat. ON was slightly better, but the margin
was small.
- The finished 24-hour ON arm did not show a clear progressive late-run
collapse. Hourly TTFB p50 stayed in a narrow band around `28.0` to `28.6 ms`.
### Finished ON Hourly TTFB Averages
```text
hour 1: p50 27.77 ms p90 89.63 ms p99 249.21 ms
hour 2: p50 28.27 ms p90 101.84 ms p99 279.31 ms
hour 3: p50 28.36 ms p90 101.97 ms p99 277.86 ms
hour 4: p50 28.42 ms p90 100.45 ms p99 280.51 ms
hour 5: p50 28.35 ms p90 95.20 ms p99 268.26 ms
hour 6: p50 28.43 ms p90 99.26 ms p99 276.69 ms
hour 7: p50 28.53 ms p90 99.19 ms p99 275.06 ms
hour 8: p50 28.48 ms p90 99.50 ms p99 281.02 ms
hour 9: p50 28.44 ms p90 99.99 ms p99 278.51 ms
hour 10: p50 28.35 ms p90 96.02 ms p99 274.37 ms
hour 11: p50 28.42 ms p90 101.58 ms p99 292.25 ms
hour 12: p50 28.28 ms p90 98.39 ms p99 274.88 ms
hour 13: p50 28.48 ms p90 100.85 ms p99 286.91 ms
hour 14: p50 28.27 ms p90 99.70 ms p99 286.36 ms
hour 15: p50 28.26 ms p90 98.98 ms p99 281.28 ms
hour 16: p50 27.88 ms p90 96.31 ms p99 281.40 ms
hour 17: p50 28.14 ms p90 100.01 ms p99 296.12 ms
hour 18: p50 28.03 ms p90 100.29 ms p99 286.65 ms
hour 19: p50 28.13 ms p90 101.26 ms p99 290.56 ms
hour 20: p50 28.21 ms p90 100.71 ms p99 284.87 ms
hour 21: p50 28.18 ms p90 101.70 ms p99 284.41 ms
hour 22: p50 28.01 ms p90 97.74 ms p99 285.66 ms
hour 23: p50 28.30 ms p90 101.61 ms p99 292.92 ms
hour 24: p50 28.63 ms p90 103.21 ms p99 285.69 ms
```
### Artifacts
Remote result directories:
```text
/home/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-12h-5x2-20260613T132536Z-off-rebooted
/home/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-24h-5x2-20260614T020920Z-on-rebooted-latest
```
Local copies used during analysis:
```text
/Users/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-12h-5x2-20260613T132536Z-off-rebooted
/Users/rooseveltlai/buckit-docker-rig/results/replay-24h-5x2-20260614T020920Z-on-rebooted-latest
```