mirror of
https://github.com/temetro/temetro.git
synced 2026-08-27 10:56:58 +00:00
feat: admin-provisioned staff, username login & role-based access
Replace the email-invitation flow with admin-provisioned staff accounts and
add role-based access that changes what each member sees.
Backend:
- Enable Better Auth `username` plugin (staff sign in by username); regenerate
auth schema (+ username/displayUsername on user) and migration 0007.
- Add `doctor` and `reception` roles to the access-control RBAC. `reception` is
scoped to scheduling + registration (no `prescription` statement).
- New `/api/staff` route: POST creates a user (auth.api.signUpEmail) and adds
them to the active clinic (auth.api.addMember); GET lists members + usernames.
Gated by requirePermission({ member: ["create"] }).
- Redact clinical PHI for the reception role in the patients service (read,
create and update) so demographics-only is enforced server-side.
Frontend:
- usernameClient + Email|Username tabs on the login form.
- lib/roles.ts: useActiveRole + Better-Auth-permission-driven nav visibility,
default landing, and a route guard (reception -> /appointments, blocked from
clinical routes). Applied to the sidebar, command palette and auth guard.
- Care team page now provisions staff via a two-step Add-team-member dialog
(details -> username/password) hitting /api/staff; removes the email-invite
and pending-invitation UI. New members are contactable from Messages
automatically (they become org members).
- Hide clinical sections of the patient form and the admin-only settings tabs
for non-clinical/non-admin roles.
All permission management stays in Better Auth (per the better-auth skills now
referenced in backend/CLAUDE.md).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,6 +51,29 @@ export const member = ac.newRole({
|
||||
task: ["read", "write", "delete"],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// doctor (clinician): same clinical access as `member` — the role we provision
|
||||
// for physicians. Kept distinct from `member` so the UI can label/treat it as
|
||||
// "Doctor" and so reception can be a sibling role with narrower access.
|
||||
export const doctor = ac.newRole({
|
||||
...memberAc.statements,
|
||||
patient: ["read", "write"],
|
||||
appointment: ["read", "write", "delete"],
|
||||
prescription: ["read", "write", "delete"],
|
||||
task: ["read", "write", "delete"],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// reception (front desk): scheduling + patient registration only. Can manage
|
||||
// appointments and register/edit patient demographics, but has NO access to
|
||||
// clinical records (no prescription statement at all) — least-privilege per
|
||||
// EHR RBAC guidance. The patients service additionally redacts clinical fields
|
||||
// for this role so demographics-only is enforced server-side, not just in UI.
|
||||
export const reception = ac.newRole({
|
||||
...memberAc.statements,
|
||||
patient: ["read", "write"],
|
||||
appointment: ["read", "write", "delete"],
|
||||
task: ["read", "write"],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// viewer: read-only access to clinical records.
|
||||
export const viewer = ac.newRole({
|
||||
patient: ["read"],
|
||||
@@ -59,4 +82,4 @@ export const viewer = ac.newRole({
|
||||
task: ["read"],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
export const roles = { owner, admin, member, viewer };
|
||||
export const roles = { owner, admin, doctor, reception, member, viewer };
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user