mirror of
https://github.com/Studio-Saelix/sencho.git
synced 2026-07-27 20:29:10 +00:00
Anso
7e3e22138b
* fix(mesh): distinguish proxy bridge from pilot tunnel in registerProxyBridge rejection When central's MeshProxyTunnelDialer dials a node whose slot is already held by a peer-initiated proxy bridge, the registration is correctly refused, but the activity-log message read "pilot tunnel already registered for node N; proxy bridge refused" regardless of which kind of bridge was actually in the slot. No pilot tunnel exists in proxy-mode remotes by definition, so the wording pointed operators at the wrong subsystem. Use the existing bridgeKinds index (already consulted correctly by the sister method replaceOrRegisterProxyBridge) to emit a kind-accurate message: "proxy bridge already registered for node N; concurrent dial refused" when the existing bridge is a peer-initiated proxy bridge, keeping the original "pilot tunnel" wording for the pilot-agent case so existing log filters and the sister test still match. Pure cosmetic; the rejection behavior is unchanged. New regression test asserts the discriminator in both directions. Also tightens the test-fixture beforeEach to clear bridgeKinds alongside bridges so future tests cannot read a stale kind. * chore: ignore local trailer directory in git repository * refactor(mesh): centralize bridge-kind type and conflict-message formatter Followup tidy on PilotTunnelManager after /simplify flagged two related items in the F-R-2 change: - Extract `BridgeKind = 'pilot' | 'proxy'` as a module-scoped type alias so the kind taxonomy lives in one place. `bridgeKinds` and `injectBridgeForTest` now consume it; the inline union literal is gone. - Extract `formatBridgeConflict(nodeId, existingKind)` as a private helper. Both `registerProxyBridge` and `replaceOrRegisterProxyBridge` call it from their "slot already held" rejection paths, removing the byte-identical "pilot tunnel already registered for node N; proxy bridge refused" string copy across the two sites. - Trim the 6-line WHAT comment above the rejection throw to a 2-line WHY so the call site stays scannable. No behavior change; the three relevant test suites stay green.