mirror of
https://github.com/Studio-Saelix/sencho.git
synced 2026-08-06 00:47:52 +00:00
b91025dc8b
Remove the leftover paid-only blockingEnabled switch so enabled block-on-deploy policies enforce on every tier, matching the documented every-tier security surface. Existing Community policies begin blocking immediately with no migration.
466 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
466 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
/**
|
|
* Pre-deploy policy gate.
|
|
*
|
|
* Extracted from `index.ts` so route handlers and the scheduler can call a
|
|
* single, unit-testable function rather than copy-paste the gate logic.
|
|
*
|
|
* The gate fails open when Trivy is missing (users are never locked out by
|
|
* tooling state) and fails closed when the compose file cannot be parsed
|
|
* (a broken stack must not silently bypass a block policy).
|
|
*/
|
|
import { ComposeService } from './ComposeService';
|
|
import { DatabaseService } from './DatabaseService';
|
|
import type { ScanPolicy, VulnSeverity, VulnerabilityScan, VulnerabilityDetail } from './DatabaseService';
|
|
import { FleetSyncService } from './FleetSyncService';
|
|
import { NotificationService } from './NotificationService';
|
|
import { sanitizeForLog } from '../utils/safeLog';
|
|
import TrivyService from './TrivyService';
|
|
import { isSeverityAtLeast } from '../utils/severity';
|
|
import { applySuppressions } from '../utils/suppression-filter';
|
|
import { validateImageRef } from '../utils/image-ref';
|
|
import { getErrorMessage } from '../utils/errors';
|
|
import { isDebugEnabled } from '../utils/debug';
|
|
import {
|
|
evaluatePolicyRisk,
|
|
describePolicyInputs,
|
|
policyInputs,
|
|
type PolicyBlockReason,
|
|
type PolicyRiskInputs,
|
|
} from '../utils/policy-risk';
|
|
|
|
export interface PolicyViolation {
|
|
imageRef: string;
|
|
severity: VulnSeverity;
|
|
criticalCount: number;
|
|
highCount: number;
|
|
/** Non-suppressed CVEs in the CISA known-exploited (KEV) set on this image. */
|
|
kevCount: number;
|
|
/** Non-suppressed Critical/High findings with a fix available on this image. */
|
|
fixableCount: number;
|
|
/** Which policy inputs matched (empty when the image could not be scanned). */
|
|
reasons: PolicyBlockReason[];
|
|
scanId: number;
|
|
/**
|
|
* Why the block is unactionable by policy: set when the gate blocked because
|
|
* the image could not be scanned or evaluated (compose parse error, scan
|
|
* failure, evaluation error), not because a policy input matched. Absent for
|
|
* a normal policy match. Lets the UI explain the failure instead of showing a
|
|
* zero-count block with no reason.
|
|
*/
|
|
error?: string;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export interface PolicyEnforcementOptions {
|
|
bypass: boolean;
|
|
actor: string;
|
|
ip?: string;
|
|
/** HTTP method of the originating request; used for audit attribution. */
|
|
auditMethod?: string;
|
|
/** Request path of the originating route; used for audit attribution. */
|
|
auditPath?: string;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export interface PolicyEnforcementResult {
|
|
ok: boolean;
|
|
bypassed: boolean;
|
|
policy?: ScanPolicy;
|
|
violations: PolicyViolation[];
|
|
trivyMissing?: boolean;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const TRIVY_MISSING_NOTIFY_COOLDOWN_MS = 60 * 60 * 1000;
|
|
// Growth bounded by configured-policy fanout (only stacks with an enabled
|
|
// block_on_deploy policy can land here), not by total stack churn. Cleared
|
|
// on process restart, which is the right scope for an informational warning.
|
|
const trivyMissingNotifiedAt = new Map<string, number>();
|
|
|
|
function notifyTrivyMissingOnce(nodeId: number, stackName: string): void {
|
|
const key = `${nodeId}:${stackName}`;
|
|
const now = Date.now();
|
|
const last = trivyMissingNotifiedAt.get(key);
|
|
if (last !== undefined && now - last < TRIVY_MISSING_NOTIFY_COOLDOWN_MS) return;
|
|
trivyMissingNotifiedAt.set(key, now);
|
|
NotificationService.getInstance().dispatchAlert(
|
|
'warning',
|
|
'scan_finding',
|
|
`Pre-deploy scan for "${stackName}" skipped: Trivy not installed on this node`,
|
|
{ stackName, actor: 'system:policy' },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function _resetTrivyMissingNotificationStateForTests(): void {
|
|
trivyMissingNotifiedAt.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type PreflightScan = Pick<VulnerabilityScan, 'id' | 'highest_severity' | 'critical_count' | 'high_count' | 'total_vulnerabilities'>;
|
|
|
|
interface ImageRiskEvaluation {
|
|
/** Policy inputs that matched for this image. */
|
|
reasons: PolicyBlockReason[];
|
|
/** Highest non-suppressed severity; UNKNOWN means no severity remains. */
|
|
severity: VulnSeverity;
|
|
criticalCount: number;
|
|
highCount: number;
|
|
kevCount: number;
|
|
fixableCount: number;
|
|
/** CVE IDs suppressed for this image; only populated when honoring suppressions. */
|
|
suppressedCves: string[];
|
|
/** True when the same inputs would have matched if suppressions were ignored. */
|
|
rawWouldBlock: boolean;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
interface SuppressionPass {
|
|
imageRef: string;
|
|
cves: string[];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Aggregate-only evaluation. Two roles: the cheap fast path for a severity-only
|
|
* policy that does not need detail rows (`failClosed=false`), and the fallback
|
|
* when the detail rows cannot be trusted. Severity stays verifiable from the
|
|
* stored aggregate counts, so it always gates. KEV/fixability cannot be read
|
|
* from aggregates: when `failClosed` is set the active KEV/fixable inputs block
|
|
* anyway, because their absence cannot be proven without the details.
|
|
*/
|
|
function aggregateFallback(
|
|
inputs: PolicyRiskInputs,
|
|
rawSeverity: VulnSeverity,
|
|
scan: PreflightScan,
|
|
failClosed: boolean,
|
|
): ImageRiskEvaluation {
|
|
const reasons: PolicyBlockReason[] = [];
|
|
if (inputs.blockOnSeverity && isSeverityAtLeast(rawSeverity, inputs.maxSeverity)) reasons.push('severity');
|
|
if (failClosed && inputs.blockOnKev) reasons.push('kev');
|
|
if (failClosed && inputs.blockOnFixable) reasons.push('fixable');
|
|
return {
|
|
reasons,
|
|
severity: rawSeverity,
|
|
criticalCount: scan.critical_count,
|
|
highCount: scan.high_count,
|
|
kevCount: 0,
|
|
fixableCount: 0,
|
|
suppressedCves: [],
|
|
rawWouldBlock: reasons.length > 0,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Resolve which of a policy's risk inputs (severity, KEV, fixability) an image
|
|
* matches. A severity-only policy that is not honoring suppressions keeps the
|
|
* cheap aggregate path (historical behavior). Any KEV/fixable input, or honoring
|
|
* suppressions, requires the per-finding detail rows: KEV/fixability cannot be
|
|
* read from the aggregate counts, so the details are loaded regardless of the
|
|
* honor flag. KEV/fixable are evaluated over the non-suppressed set only.
|
|
*/
|
|
function evaluateImageRisk(
|
|
scan: PreflightScan,
|
|
imageRef: string,
|
|
policy: ScanPolicy,
|
|
honorSuppressions: boolean,
|
|
): ImageRiskEvaluation {
|
|
const inputs = policyInputs(policy);
|
|
const rawSeverity = scan.highest_severity ?? 'UNKNOWN';
|
|
const needsDetails = inputs.blockOnKev || inputs.blockOnFixable || honorSuppressions;
|
|
if (!needsDetails) {
|
|
return aggregateFallback(inputs, rawSeverity, scan, false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const db = DatabaseService.getInstance();
|
|
let findings: VulnerabilityDetail[];
|
|
let suppressions;
|
|
try {
|
|
findings = db.getAllVulnerabilityDetails(scan.id);
|
|
suppressions = db.getCveSuppressions();
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
// Detail read failed: severity still gates from the aggregate, but
|
|
// KEV/fixability are unknowable. Fail closed on them, consistent with the
|
|
// truncated-details path below: a policy that explicitly opted into a
|
|
// KEV/fixable gate must not silently degrade to "allow" on a transient
|
|
// read error. The admin bypass path stays available.
|
|
console.error('[Policy] Detail read failed for %s; gating severity on aggregate, failing closed on KEV/fixable:', sanitizeForLog(imageRef), sanitizeForLog(getErrorMessage(err, 'db read failed')));
|
|
return aggregateFallback(inputs, rawSeverity, scan, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The stored detail rows must reproduce the scan's full finding set before
|
|
// KEV/fixability can be trusted. A cache-hit preflight scan keeps the
|
|
// complete aggregate counts but copies only the first N detail rows. When the
|
|
// counts disagree, gate severity on the raw aggregate and fail closed on any
|
|
// KEV/fixable input: absence of a known-exploited or fixable finding cannot be
|
|
// proven from a truncated set, so the unverifiable finding is treated as risky.
|
|
if (findings.length !== scan.total_vulnerabilities) {
|
|
if (scan.total_vulnerabilities > 0) {
|
|
console.warn(
|
|
'[Policy] Scan %d detail rows (%d) do not match its total (%d); gating severity on raw scan, failing closed on KEV/fixable',
|
|
scan.id, findings.length, scan.total_vulnerabilities,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return aggregateFallback(inputs, rawSeverity, scan, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// KEV membership is the same for the full set and the non-suppressed subset,
|
|
// so resolve intel once over every CVE and reuse it for both the effective
|
|
// decision and the suppression-pass check below.
|
|
const intel = inputs.blockOnKev ? db.getCveIntel(findings.map((f) => f.vulnerability_id)) : null;
|
|
const isKev = (cveId: string): boolean => intel?.get(cveId)?.kev === true;
|
|
|
|
const suppressedCves = new Set<string>();
|
|
let evalSet: VulnerabilityDetail[];
|
|
if (honorSuppressions) {
|
|
evalSet = [];
|
|
for (const f of applySuppressions(findings, imageRef, suppressions)) {
|
|
if (f.suppressed) { suppressedCves.add(f.vulnerability_id); continue; }
|
|
evalSet.push(f);
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
evalSet = findings;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const outcome = evaluatePolicyRisk(evalSet, isKev, inputs);
|
|
// When honoring suppressions, "would have blocked on the raw set" detects a
|
|
// pass that only succeeded because an accepted CVE was filtered out.
|
|
const rawWouldBlock = honorSuppressions
|
|
? evaluatePolicyRisk(findings, isKev, inputs).reasons.length > 0
|
|
: outcome.reasons.length > 0;
|
|
return {
|
|
reasons: outcome.reasons,
|
|
severity: outcome.highestSeverity,
|
|
criticalCount: outcome.criticalCount,
|
|
highCount: outcome.highCount,
|
|
kevCount: outcome.kevCount,
|
|
fixableCount: outcome.fixableCount,
|
|
suppressedCves: [...suppressedCves],
|
|
rawWouldBlock,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* A deploy that would have been blocked on raw severity but proceeded because
|
|
* suppressions dropped every image below the threshold is a security-relevant
|
|
* event: record it so the suppression-driven pass is traceable in the audit log.
|
|
*/
|
|
function recordSuppressionPassAudit(
|
|
stackName: string,
|
|
nodeId: number,
|
|
policy: ScanPolicy,
|
|
passes: SuppressionPass[],
|
|
opts: PolicyEnforcementOptions,
|
|
): void {
|
|
const cves = [...new Set(passes.flatMap((p) => p.cves))];
|
|
try {
|
|
DatabaseService.getInstance().insertAuditLog({
|
|
timestamp: Date.now(),
|
|
username: opts.actor,
|
|
method: opts.auditMethod ?? 'POST',
|
|
path: opts.auditPath ?? `/api/stacks/${stackName}/deploy`,
|
|
status_code: 200,
|
|
node_id: nodeId,
|
|
ip_address: opts.ip ?? '',
|
|
summary: `policy.suppression_pass stack="${stackName}" policy="${policy.name}" images=[${passes.map((p) => p.imageRef).join(',')}] cves=[${cves.join(',')}]`,
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
console.error('[Policy] Failed to record suppression-pass audit entry:', err);
|
|
}
|
|
console.warn(
|
|
'[Policy] Deploy for "%s" allowed by suppressions: %d image(s) would have matched %s (policy "%s")',
|
|
sanitizeForLog(stackName), passes.length, describePolicyInputs(policyInputs(policy)), sanitizeForLog(policy.name),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export async function enforcePolicyPreDeploy(
|
|
stackName: string,
|
|
nodeId: number,
|
|
opts: PolicyEnforcementOptions,
|
|
): Promise<PolicyEnforcementResult> {
|
|
const db = DatabaseService.getInstance();
|
|
const policy = db.getMatchingPolicy(nodeId, stackName, FleetSyncService.getSelfIdentity());
|
|
|
|
if (!policy || !policy.enabled || !policy.block_on_deploy) {
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: false, policy: policy ?? undefined, violations: [] };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const svc = TrivyService.getInstance();
|
|
if (!svc.isTrivyAvailable()) {
|
|
notifyTrivyMissingOnce(nodeId, stackName);
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: false, policy, violations: [], trivyMissing: true };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let imageRefs: string[] = [];
|
|
try {
|
|
imageRefs = await ComposeService.getInstance(nodeId).listStackImages(stackName);
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
const message = getErrorMessage(err, 'compose parse failed');
|
|
console.error('[Policy] listStackImages failed for %s:', sanitizeForLog(stackName), sanitizeForLog(message));
|
|
return {
|
|
ok: false,
|
|
bypassed: false,
|
|
policy,
|
|
violations: [{
|
|
imageRef: '(compose parse error)',
|
|
severity: 'UNKNOWN',
|
|
criticalCount: 0,
|
|
highCount: 0,
|
|
kevCount: 0,
|
|
fixableCount: 0,
|
|
reasons: [],
|
|
scanId: 0,
|
|
error: `Compose file could not be parsed: ${message}`,
|
|
}],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return enforcePolicyForImageRefs(stackName, nodeId, imageRefs, opts, policy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export async function enforcePolicyForImageRefs(
|
|
stackName: string,
|
|
nodeId: number,
|
|
imageRefs: string[],
|
|
opts: PolicyEnforcementOptions,
|
|
matchedPolicy?: ScanPolicy,
|
|
failClosedInvalidRefs = false,
|
|
): Promise<PolicyEnforcementResult> {
|
|
const db = DatabaseService.getInstance();
|
|
const policy = matchedPolicy ?? db.getMatchingPolicy(nodeId, stackName, FleetSyncService.getSelfIdentity());
|
|
|
|
if (!policy || !policy.enabled || !policy.block_on_deploy) {
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: false, policy: policy ?? undefined, violations: [] };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const svc = TrivyService.getInstance();
|
|
if (!svc.isTrivyAvailable()) {
|
|
notifyTrivyMissingOnce(nodeId, stackName);
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: false, policy, violations: [], trivyMissing: true };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const honorSuppressions = db.getGlobalSettings()['deploy_block_honor_suppressions'] === '1';
|
|
|
|
const debug = isDebugEnabled();
|
|
if (debug) {
|
|
console.log(
|
|
'[Policy:debug] Evaluating "%s" against policy "%s" (inputs=%s, images=%d, honorSuppressions=%s)',
|
|
sanitizeForLog(stackName), sanitizeForLog(policy.name), describePolicyInputs(policyInputs(policy)), imageRefs.length, honorSuppressions,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const violations: PolicyViolation[] = [];
|
|
const suppressionPasses: SuppressionPass[] = [];
|
|
for (const imageRef of imageRefs) {
|
|
if (!validateImageRef(imageRef)) {
|
|
if (failClosedInvalidRefs) {
|
|
violations.push({
|
|
imageRef,
|
|
severity: 'UNKNOWN',
|
|
criticalCount: 0,
|
|
highCount: 0,
|
|
kevCount: 0,
|
|
fixableCount: 0,
|
|
reasons: [],
|
|
scanId: 0,
|
|
error: 'Invalid image reference; the image could not be scanned',
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
let scan: VulnerabilityScan;
|
|
try {
|
|
scan = await svc.scanImagePreflight(imageRef, nodeId, stackName);
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
const message = getErrorMessage(err, 'pre-flight scan failed');
|
|
console.error(`[Policy] scanImagePreflight failed for ${imageRef}:`, message);
|
|
violations.push({
|
|
imageRef,
|
|
severity: 'UNKNOWN',
|
|
criticalCount: 0,
|
|
highCount: 0,
|
|
kevCount: 0,
|
|
fixableCount: 0,
|
|
reasons: [],
|
|
scanId: 0,
|
|
error: `Pre-flight scan failed: ${message}`,
|
|
});
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
const evaluated = evaluateImageRisk(scan, imageRef, policy, honorSuppressions);
|
|
if (debug) {
|
|
console.log(
|
|
'[Policy:debug] %s scanned: severity=%s kev=%d fixable=%d matched=[%s]',
|
|
sanitizeForLog(imageRef), evaluated.severity, evaluated.kevCount, evaluated.fixableCount, evaluated.reasons.join(','),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (evaluated.reasons.length > 0) {
|
|
violations.push({
|
|
imageRef,
|
|
severity: evaluated.severity,
|
|
criticalCount: evaluated.criticalCount,
|
|
highCount: evaluated.highCount,
|
|
kevCount: evaluated.kevCount,
|
|
fixableCount: evaluated.fixableCount,
|
|
reasons: evaluated.reasons,
|
|
scanId: scan.id,
|
|
});
|
|
} else if (
|
|
honorSuppressions &&
|
|
evaluated.suppressedCves.length > 0 &&
|
|
evaluated.rawWouldBlock
|
|
) {
|
|
suppressionPasses.push({ imageRef, cves: evaluated.suppressedCves });
|
|
}
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
const message = getErrorMessage(err, 'policy evaluation failed');
|
|
console.error(`[Policy] policy evaluation failed for ${imageRef}:`, message);
|
|
violations.push({
|
|
imageRef,
|
|
severity: 'UNKNOWN',
|
|
criticalCount: 0,
|
|
highCount: 0,
|
|
kevCount: 0,
|
|
fixableCount: 0,
|
|
reasons: [],
|
|
// The scan completed; only evaluation failed, so the real scan
|
|
// id is kept (the other failure sites have no scan and use 0).
|
|
scanId: scan.id,
|
|
error: `Policy evaluation failed: ${message}`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (violations.length === 0) {
|
|
if (suppressionPasses.length > 0) {
|
|
recordSuppressionPassAudit(stackName, nodeId, policy, suppressionPasses, opts);
|
|
}
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: false, policy, violations: [] };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (opts.bypass) {
|
|
try {
|
|
db.insertAuditLog({
|
|
timestamp: Date.now(),
|
|
username: opts.actor,
|
|
method: opts.auditMethod ?? 'POST',
|
|
path: opts.auditPath ?? `/api/stacks/${stackName}/deploy`,
|
|
status_code: 200,
|
|
node_id: nodeId,
|
|
ip_address: opts.ip ?? '',
|
|
summary: `policy.bypass stack="${stackName}" policy="${policy.name}" violations=${violations.length} images=[${violations.map((v) => v.imageRef).join(',')}]`,
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (err) {
|
|
console.error('[Policy] Failed to record bypass audit entry:', err);
|
|
}
|
|
if (debug) {
|
|
console.log(
|
|
'[Policy:debug] Bypass for "%s" (%d violation(s))',
|
|
sanitizeForLog(stackName), violations.length,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return { ok: true, bypassed: true, policy, violations };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
console.warn(
|
|
'[Policy] Blocked deploy for "%s": %d image(s) matched %s (policy "%s")',
|
|
sanitizeForLog(stackName), violations.length, describePolicyInputs(policyInputs(policy)), sanitizeForLog(policy.name),
|
|
);
|
|
return { ok: false, bypassed: false, policy, violations };
|
|
}
|