Files
rustfs/docs/operations/kms-backend-security.md
T

4.2 KiB

KMS backend security properties

RustFS ships several KMS backends. They differ not only in deployment effort but in where master key material lives and who can read it. Pick a backend based on the confidentiality boundary you need, not on the name alone.

Backend comparison

Backend Config tag Master key material location At-rest protection of key material Rotation Intended use
Local Local Files under key_dir, encrypted with the configured local master key Local master key (AES-GCM) + file permissions Rejected (no versioned retention yet) Development; single-node setups that accept host-level trust
Static Static Provided out-of-band via environment/file; never persisted by RustFS Operator-managed secret distribution Rejected (read-only backend) Simple deployments with an external secret manager
Vault KV2 VaultKV2 (legacy alias Vault) Stored directly in Vault KV v2 (Base64-encoded plaintext) Vault ACLs + KV v2 at-rest encryption + TLS only Rejected (no versioned retention yet) Deployments that accept Vault KV ACLs as the sole confidentiality boundary
Vault Transit VaultTransit Key-encryption keys never leave Vault; only Transit ciphertext is visible outside Vault Transit engine (cryptographic isolation) Via Vault Transit key versioning Deployments that need key material to be unreadable through storage APIs

Vault KV2: what the backend does and does not do

The Vault KV2 backend uses Vault purely as a secure storage service:

  • Master key material is generated by RustFS and written to KV v2 as a Base64-encoded value (encrypted_key_material is an encoding, not a ciphertext).
  • The backend never calls the Vault Transit engine. The mount_path configuration field and the RUSTFS_KMS_VAULT_MOUNT_PATH environment variable are deprecated leftovers: they are accepted for compatibility and ignored.
  • Data-encryption keys (DEKs) handed to the object-encryption path are still wrapped with AES-256-GCM under the master key; the statement above concerns the master key's storage in Vault, not the DEK envelope.
  • The backend reports this boundary in its backend_info metadata as at_rest_protection: vault-kv2-acl.
  • Key rotation is rejected (InvalidOperation) until versioned key material retention lands; rotating by overwriting the stored key would orphan every DEK wrapped by the previous version.

Warning: KV read access is equivalent to holding the master keys. Any Vault identity (token, AppRole, or policy) that can read the RustFS key path in KV v2 can recover the plaintext master key material and decrypt every object protected by those keys. Treat KV read grants on that path with the same care as handing out the keys themselves. If this is not acceptable, use the Vault Transit backend instead.

Minimal Vault policy for the KV2 backend

Scope the RustFS token/AppRole to exactly the KV v2 mount and key prefix it is configured with (defaults shown: mount secret, prefix rustfs/kms/keys), and grant no other identity read access to that subtree:

# RustFS KMS (Vault KV2 backend) — key storage only, no Transit access needed.
path "secret/data/rustfs/kms/keys/*" {
  capabilities = ["create", "read", "update"]
}

path "secret/metadata/rustfs/kms/keys/*" {
  capabilities = ["list", "read", "delete"]
}

Notes:

  • delete on the metadata path is required for permanent key deletion (force_immediate); drop it if you never hard-delete keys.
  • Do not attach sudo, wildcard mounts, or Transit paths to this policy; the KV2 backend does not use them.
  • Auditing KV reads on the key prefix is strongly recommended: every read event is a potential master-key disclosure.

Choosing between Vault KV2 and Vault Transit

Use Vault Transit (VaultTransit) when key material must be cryptographically isolated from anyone holding storage-level read access: Transit keeps key-encryption keys inside Vault and only ever returns ciphertext, and supports server-side key versioning/rotation.

Use Vault KV2 only when you accept that the Vault ACL on the key path is the confidentiality boundary and you want the operational simplicity of a single KV mount.