Files
rustfs/crates/lock/src/fast_lock/tests.rs
T
Miguel Amador acce8b2253 fix(lock): let waiters hear releases and let acquisition succeed past registered waiters (#5670)
* fix(lock): let waiters hear releases and let acquisition succeed past registered waiters

Same-key write contention scaled superlinearly with writer count: 8
concurrent conditional PUTs on one key cost ~340-460 ms, 16 cost ~700 ms,
32 cost ~5 s, against ~4 ms per uncontended write and ~10 ms actual lock
holds (measured via RUSTFS_OBJECT_LOCK_DIAG at 1 ms thresholds). Outcomes
were always correct; the cost was pure waiting.

Two coupled defects in fast_lock caused it:

1. The slow path's early retries slept without subscribing to anything.
   notify_writer()/notify_readers() are gated on the waiter counters,
   which a sleeper never increments, so a release during the backoff
   woke nobody. The lock sat free while every loser slept out its full
   backoff, and the ladder compounded: successive acquires landed at
   the cumulative ladder offsets (10+20+40+80+100... ms).

2. try_acquire_exclusive demanded the entire packed state word be zero,
   including the readers_waiting/writers_waiting counter bits. A lock
   with registered waiters could be acquired by no one - including the
   waiters themselves, each blocked by the others' registration - so
   contended acquisition only succeeded in windows where every waiter
   happened to be unregistered. This is also why (1) could not be fixed
   by simply registering the sleepers: registration alone deadlocks
   acquisition until the acquire deadline. try_acquire_shared already
   masks correctly and preserves the counter bits in its CAS; the
   exclusive path now mirrors it.

The fix: mask the acquisition CAS to ownership bits only (writer flag,
active readers), and turn the early-retry sleep into a notification wait
bounded by the same backoff, so a release wakes a waiter immediately
while the bound still protects against lost or stolen wakeups exactly as
NOTIFY_WAIT_CAP does for the post-retry wait.

With both changes, 8 concurrent same-key CAS writers resolve in 17-29 ms
(was 340-460 ms) and 32 resolve in 20-53 ms (was ~5 s), with per-racer
cost now decreasing in N. Outcomes remain exactly one winner, N-1
precondition failures, zero errors at every width. cargo test -p
rustfs-lock passes 113/113 at pristine-parity runtime, including
test_concurrent_write_lock_contention, which previously only passed
because sleepers were invisible to it.

* test(lock): pin both halves of the waiter-starvation fix

The fix commit touched only production files, so reverting either half
left the suite green: test_concurrent_write_lock_contention only waits
for five writers to finish and never asserts that acquisition happens
before the backoff ladder runs out.

Three tests, one per revert:

* exclusive_acquisition_ignores_registered_waiters (state.rs) - a free
  lock with registered waiters must be acquirable, and the CAS must
  preserve the counters. Fails against the all-zero `expected`.

* early_retry_registers_as_waiter (shard.rs) - a waiter in the
  early-retry backoff must appear in the writer waiter count within the
  ~750ms early-retry phase, since notify_writer/notify_readers are gated
  on those counters. Fails against a bare `sleep`, which registers
  nowhere.

* contended_writers_drain_promptly_after_release (tests.rs) - 16 same-key
  writers, all registered behind one holder, must drain within 1s of the
  release rather than sit out their 5s acquire deadlines. Fails against
  the all-zero `expected` end to end.

Wakeup latency is deliberately not asserted anywhere. NOTIFY_POOL is a
process-global of 128 Notify slots shared by every lock, so a waiter in
a concurrently-running test can consume another's notify_one and push it
to the end of its rung: a 24-key latency probe measured ~150us in
isolation and ~92ms - a full unexpired rung - alongside the existing
64-key missed-wakeup test. That is the stolen wakeup NOTIFY_WAIT_CAP
already exists to bound, and it makes any in-suite latency budget flaky.

cargo test -p rustfs-lock: 116/116.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Amador <miguel@amador.one>

---------

Signed-off-by: Miguel Amador <miguel@amador.one>
2026-08-03 22:08:48 +08:00

681 lines
26 KiB
Rust

// Copyright 2024 RustFS Team
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
#[cfg(test)]
mod fast_lock_tests {
use crate::LockError;
use crate::fast_lock::types::{LockConfig, LockMode, LockPriority, LockResult, ObjectKey, ObjectLockRequest};
use crate::fast_lock::{DEFAULT_SHARD_COUNT, FastObjectLockManager};
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::time::{Duration, Instant};
use tokio::time::sleep;
/// Helper function to create a test lock manager
fn create_test_manager() -> FastObjectLockManager {
let config = LockConfig {
shard_count: 4, // Use smaller shard count for tests
default_lock_timeout: Duration::from_secs(30),
default_acquire_timeout: Duration::from_secs(5),
..LockConfig::default()
};
FastObjectLockManager::with_config(config)
}
#[test]
fn try_with_config_returns_error_for_invalid_shard_count() {
let config = LockConfig {
shard_count: 3,
..LockConfig::default()
};
let err = FastObjectLockManager::try_with_config(config)
.expect_err("non-power-of-two shard counts should return an explicit configuration error");
assert!(matches!(err, LockError::Configuration { .. }));
assert!(err.to_string().contains("shard count must be a non-zero power of 2"));
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn with_config_falls_back_to_default_for_invalid_shard_count() {
let config = LockConfig {
shard_count: 3,
..LockConfig::default()
};
let manager = FastObjectLockManager::with_config(config);
assert_eq!(manager.shards.len(), DEFAULT_SHARD_COUNT);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_basic_write_lock_acquire_release() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("test-owner");
// Acquire write lock
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock");
// Verify guard properties
assert_eq!(guard.key(), &key);
assert_eq!(guard.mode(), LockMode::Exclusive);
assert_eq!(guard.owner(), &owner);
assert!(!guard.is_released());
// Manually release lock
assert!(guard.release(), "Should release lock successfully");
assert!(guard.is_released(), "Guard should be marked as released");
// Try to acquire again - should succeed
let guard2 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock again after release");
drop(guard2);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_basic_read_lock_acquire_release() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("test-owner");
// Acquire read lock
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire read lock");
// Verify guard properties
assert_eq!(guard.key(), &key);
assert_eq!(guard.mode(), LockMode::Shared);
assert_eq!(guard.owner(), &owner);
assert!(!guard.is_released());
// Manually release lock
assert!(guard.release(), "Should release lock successfully");
assert!(guard.is_released(), "Guard should be marked as released");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_lock_auto_release_on_drop() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner1: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner1");
let owner2: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner2");
// Acquire lock and drop guard
{
let guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner1.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock");
assert!(!guard.is_released());
// Guard is dropped here, lock should be automatically released
}
// Wait a bit to ensure cleanup
sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
// Another owner should be able to acquire the lock
let guard2 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner2.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock after previous guard dropped");
drop(guard2);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_multiple_read_locks() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner1: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner1");
let owner2: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner2");
let owner3: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner3");
// Multiple read locks should be allowed
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), owner1.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire first read lock");
let mut guard2 = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), owner2.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire second read lock");
let mut guard3 = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), owner3.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire third read lock");
// All guards should be valid
assert_eq!(guard1.mode(), LockMode::Shared);
assert_eq!(guard2.mode(), LockMode::Shared);
assert_eq!(guard3.mode(), LockMode::Shared);
// Release all
assert!(guard1.release());
assert!(guard2.release());
assert!(guard3.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_write_lock_excludes_read_lock() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let writer: Arc<str> = Arc::from("writer");
let reader: Arc<str> = Arc::from("reader");
// Acquire write lock
let mut write_guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), writer.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock");
// Try to acquire read lock - should timeout
let read_request =
ObjectLockRequest::new_read(key.clone(), reader.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(read_request).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Read lock should timeout when write lock is held"
);
// Release write lock
assert!(write_guard.release());
// Now read lock should succeed
let mut read_guard = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), reader.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire read lock after write lock released");
assert!(read_guard.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_read_lock_excludes_write_lock() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let reader: Arc<str> = Arc::from("reader");
let writer: Arc<str> = Arc::from("writer");
// Acquire read lock
let mut read_guard = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), reader.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire read lock");
// Try to acquire write lock - should timeout
let write_request =
ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), writer.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(write_request).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Write lock should timeout when read lock is held"
);
// Release read lock
assert!(read_guard.release());
// Now write lock should succeed
let mut write_guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), writer.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock after read lock released");
assert!(write_guard.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_write_lock_excludes_write_lock() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner1: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner1");
let owner2: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner2");
// Acquire first write lock
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner1.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire first write lock");
// Try to acquire second write lock - should timeout
let request2 = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), owner2.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(request2).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Second write lock should timeout when first write lock is held"
);
// Release first lock
assert!(guard1.release());
// Now second write lock should succeed
let mut guard2 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner2.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire second write lock after first released");
assert!(guard2.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_same_owner_reentrant_write_lock() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner");
// Acquire first write lock
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire first write lock");
// Same owner trying to acquire again - should timeout (not reentrant)
let request2 = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), owner.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(request2).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Same owner should not be able to acquire lock again (not reentrant)"
);
assert!(guard1.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_different_keys_no_conflict() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key1 = ObjectKey::new("bucket1", "object1");
let key2 = ObjectKey::new("bucket2", "object2");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner");
// Acquire locks on different keys simultaneously
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key1.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock on key1");
let mut guard2 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key2.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock on key2");
// Both should be valid
assert_eq!(guard1.key(), &key1);
assert_eq!(guard2.key(), &key2);
assert!(guard1.release());
assert!(guard2.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_versioned_keys() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let base_key = ObjectKey::new("bucket", "object");
let versioned_key = ObjectKey::with_version("bucket", "object", "v1");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner");
// Acquire lock on base key
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(base_key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock on base key");
// Should be able to acquire lock on versioned key (different keys)
let mut guard2 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(versioned_key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock on versioned key");
assert_eq!(guard1.key(), &base_key);
assert_eq!(guard2.key(), &versioned_key);
assert!(guard1.release());
assert!(guard2.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_concurrent_read_locks() {
let manager = Arc::new(create_test_manager());
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let num_readers = 10;
let mut handles = Vec::new();
// Spawn multiple readers
for i in 0..num_readers {
let manager = manager.clone();
let key = key.clone();
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from(format!("reader-{}", i));
let handle = tokio::spawn(async move {
let mut guard = manager.acquire_read_lock(key, owner).await.expect("Should acquire read lock");
// Hold lock for a bit
sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
assert!(guard.release());
});
handles.push(handle);
}
// Wait for all readers
for handle in handles {
handle.await.expect("Reader task should complete");
}
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_concurrent_write_lock_contention() {
let manager = Arc::new(create_test_manager());
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let num_writers = 5;
let mut handles = Vec::new();
// Spawn multiple writers - they should serialize
for i in 0..num_writers {
let manager = manager.clone();
let key = key.clone();
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from(format!("writer-{}", i));
let handle = tokio::spawn(async move {
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key, owner)
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock");
// Hold lock for a bit
sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
assert!(guard.release());
});
handles.push(handle);
}
// Wait for all writers - they should complete sequentially
for handle in handles {
handle.await.expect("Writer task should complete");
}
}
// Regression for the fast-lock lost-wakeup (backlog#853 follow-up).
//
// A waiter that enters the notification wait can miss its wakeup: the release
// path only calls `notify_one` when `writer_waiters > 0`, so if the holder
// releases in the narrow gap after the waiter's `try_acquire` fails but before
// it registers as a waiter, no notification (and no stored permit) is produced.
// The waiter then blocks until the acquire deadline even though the lock is free
// and stays free — surfacing as a spurious `LockResult::Timeout`.
//
// Each key here has one long holder plus one waiter that starts slightly later,
// so the waiter is pushed past the early backoff phase into the notification
// wait and there is no re-contention after the single release. With the fix
// (bounded notification wait + re-poll) the waiter acquires within ~50ms of the
// release; without it, the missed wakeup strands the waiter until timeout.
// Many independent keys make hitting the narrow race reliable.
#[tokio::test(flavor = "multi_thread")]
async fn write_lock_waiter_is_not_stranded_by_missed_wakeup() {
let manager = Arc::new(create_test_manager());
const KEYS: usize = 64;
// Long enough to push the waiter past the ~850ms backoff phase into the
// notification wait, where the missed-wakeup bug lives.
const HOLDER_HOLD: Duration = Duration::from_millis(950);
let mut handles = Vec::new();
for k in 0..KEYS {
let key = ObjectKey::new("bucket", format!("object-{k}"));
// Holder: grabs the lock immediately and holds it across the waiter's
// backoff-to-notification transition, then releases exactly once.
let holder_mgr = manager.clone();
let holder_key = key.clone();
handles.push(tokio::spawn(async move {
let mut guard = holder_mgr
.acquire_write_lock(holder_key, "holder")
.await
.expect("holder should acquire immediately");
sleep(HOLDER_HOLD).await;
assert!(guard.release());
}));
// Waiter: starts a touch later so the holder wins the lock first, then
// must survive the whole hold and acquire promptly after the release.
let waiter_mgr = manager.clone();
let waiter_key = key.clone();
handles.push(tokio::spawn(async move {
sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
let request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(waiter_key, "waiter").with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_secs(5));
let mut guard = waiter_mgr
.acquire_lock(request)
.await
.expect("waiter must acquire after the holder releases, not time out on a missed wakeup");
assert!(guard.release());
}));
}
for handle in handles {
handle.await.expect("lock task should not panic");
}
}
// Regression for the waiter-preserving exclusive CAS, end to end
// (rustfs#5657 same-key write contention).
//
// `try_acquire_exclusive` used to demand a fully-zero state word, which
// includes the waiting counters. Once the slow path's retries register as
// waiters — as they must, to hear a release — a lock with waiters becomes
// acquirable by no one, each waiter blocked by the others' registration, so
// every waiter here sits out its full acquire deadline instead of draining.
//
// The holder is held long enough for all waiters to be registered before
// the single release. After it they only serialize on each other, holding
// nothing, so they should drain in tens of milliseconds.
#[tokio::test(flavor = "multi_thread")]
async fn contended_writers_drain_promptly_after_release() {
let manager = Arc::new(create_test_manager());
let key = ObjectKey::new("bucket", "hot-object");
const WAITERS: usize = 16;
const HOLD: Duration = Duration::from_millis(300);
// Generous next to the ~20ms the fixed path needs for these waiters, and
// far below the 5s acquire deadline a zero-state CAS makes them all
// sit out.
const DRAIN_BUDGET: Duration = Duration::from_millis(1000);
let mut holder = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), "holder")
.await
.expect("holder should acquire immediately");
let mut handles = Vec::new();
for i in 0..WAITERS {
let manager = manager.clone();
let key = key.clone();
handles.push(tokio::spawn(async move {
let request =
ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key, format!("waiter-{i}")).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_secs(5));
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_lock(request)
.await
.expect("every waiter must acquire once the holder releases");
assert!(guard.release());
}));
}
// Let every waiter fail its fast path and register in the retry ladder.
sleep(HOLD).await;
let released_at = Instant::now();
assert!(holder.release());
for handle in handles {
handle.await.expect("waiter task should not panic");
}
let drain = released_at.elapsed();
assert!(
drain < DRAIN_BUDGET,
"{WAITERS} waiters took {drain:?} to drain after the release (budget {DRAIN_BUDGET:?}) - \
registered waiters are blocking acquisition"
);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_lock_timeout() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner1: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner1");
let owner2: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner2");
// Acquire first lock
let mut guard1 = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner1.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire first lock");
// Try to acquire with short timeout - should timeout
let request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), owner2.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(50));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(request).await;
assert!(matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)), "Should timeout when lock is held");
assert!(guard1.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_lock_priority() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let normal_owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("normal");
let high_owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("high");
// Acquire normal priority lock
let normal_request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), normal_owner.clone())
.with_priority(LockPriority::Normal)
.with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_secs(1));
let mut normal_guard = manager
.acquire_lock(normal_request)
.await
.expect("Should acquire normal priority lock");
// Try high priority lock - should still timeout (write locks are exclusive)
let high_request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), high_owner.clone())
.with_priority(LockPriority::High)
.with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(high_request).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"High priority write lock should still timeout when normal write lock is held"
);
assert!(normal_guard.release());
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_double_release() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner");
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock");
// First release should succeed
assert!(guard.release(), "First release should succeed");
assert!(guard.is_released(), "Guard should be marked as released");
// Second release should fail
assert!(!guard.release(), "Second release should fail");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_lock_info() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let owner: Arc<str> = Arc::from("owner");
let mut guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), owner.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire lock");
// Get lock info
let lock_info = guard.lock_info();
assert!(lock_info.is_some(), "Should have lock info");
if let Some(info) = lock_info {
assert_eq!(info.key, key);
assert_eq!(info.mode, LockMode::Exclusive);
assert_eq!(info.owner, owner);
}
// Release lock
assert!(guard.release());
// Lock info should be None after release
let lock_info_after = guard.lock_info();
assert!(lock_info_after.is_none(), "Lock info should be None after release");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_read_write_mixed_scenario() {
let manager = create_test_manager();
let key = ObjectKey::new("test-bucket", "test-object");
let reader1: Arc<str> = Arc::from("reader1");
let reader2: Arc<str> = Arc::from("reader2");
let writer: Arc<str> = Arc::from("writer");
// Acquire two read locks
let mut read_guard1 = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), reader1.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire first read lock");
let mut read_guard2 = manager
.acquire_read_lock(key.clone(), reader2.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire second read lock");
// Writer should timeout
let write_request =
ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), writer.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result = manager.acquire_lock(write_request).await;
assert!(
matches!(result, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Write lock should timeout when read locks are held"
);
// Release one read lock
assert!(read_guard1.release());
// Writer should still timeout (other read lock still held)
let write_request2 =
ObjectLockRequest::new_write(key.clone(), writer.clone()).with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100));
let result2 = manager.acquire_lock(write_request2).await;
assert!(
matches!(result2, Err(LockResult::Timeout)),
"Write lock should still timeout when read lock is held"
);
// Release second read lock
assert!(read_guard2.release());
// Now writer should succeed
let mut write_guard = manager
.acquire_write_lock(key.clone(), writer.clone())
.await
.expect("Should acquire write lock after all read locks released");
assert!(write_guard.release());
}
}