Files
houseme 60ad15a7f9 fix(obs): remove the dial9 task-dump switch that could never work; correct measured claims (#4688)
* fix(obs): remove the dial9 task-dump switch that could never do anything

Measured on a bench host (Linux x86_64) against the code merged in #4663: with
`RUSTFS_RUNTIME_DIAL9_TASK_DUMP_ENABLED=true`, a `dial9-taskdump` build, and
`--cfg tokio_taskdump`, dial9 recorded **zero** TaskDump events.

dial9 captures a task dump only for futures it wrapped itself — those spawned
through `dial9_tokio_telemetry::spawn`, which is where `TaskDumped<F>` gets
applied. `tokio::spawn` gets no wrapper, and RustFS spawns with `tokio::spawn`
throughout. Same workload, same binary, only the spawner changed:

    tokio::spawn   ->      0 dumps
    dial9::spawn   ->  14709 dumps, all with callchains

Upstream documents this (README line 151) and tracks the doc gap at
dial9-rs/dial9#477. I did not read it before wiring `with_task_dumps` in #4663,
and so shipped exactly the kind of lying configuration knob that PR set out to
delete. Remove it: the two environment variables, the config fields, the
`with_task_dumps` call, and the `dial9-taskdump` feature — whose only effect was
to constrain the build to Linux while recording nothing.

Re-adding it only makes sense together with migrating the paths under
investigation to dial9's spawner. Tracked as D9-16 in rustfs/backlog#1157.

Also drop the `--cfg tokio_taskdump` requirement from the Makefile. Measured:
dumps are captured with and without it (14709 vs 14674, within noise), and
upstream never asked for it. That requirement was mine, invented and untested.

Cargo.lock loses tokio's `backtrace` dependency, which `tokio/taskdump` pulled in.

Co-Authored-By: heihutu <heihutu@gmail.com>

* docs(obs): replace guessed dial9 retention numbers with measured ones

Three corrections, all to claims I wrote in #4663 without measuring them.

"Under a high poll rate that budget can wrap in minutes" was a guess. Measured on
a single-node 4-drive cluster under warp mixed (66 MiB/s, 110 obj/s, 32 concurrent):
13023 events/s, 0.16 MiB/s, so the default 1 GiB budget wraps after roughly 108
minutes. Even at ten times the throughput that is ~11 minutes. State the measured
rate and how to scale it instead.

dial9 was described as the tool for drive stalls. It is not. RustFS does disk I/O
on the blocking pool and through io_uring, never on an async worker, so a slow
drive never lengthens a poll. Injecting 200 ms of latency on one of four drives
cut throughput by 64% and left the poll distribution unchanged (polls >= 5 ms:
49 -> 56; p999: 2.67 ms -> 2.75 ms). Enabling dial9's CPU and sched profilers
does not help: sched events are per-worker only, and the CPU profiler samples
on-CPU while a stalled drive is an off-CPU wait. Say so plainly, and point at
the `rustfs_io_*` metrics instead.

What dial9 *is* good for, on the same traces: single polls of 418-625 ms with no
fault injected at all — real worker stalls nothing else in the obs stack surfaces.
Lead with that.

Also link the two upstream issues filed for the gaps we documented:
dial9-rs/dial9#658 (writer death unobservable) and #659 (worker-s3 CVEs).

Measurements: rustfs/backlog#1157 (D9-11, D9-13, D9-18).

Co-Authored-By: heihutu <heihutu@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: heihutu <heihutu@gmail.com>
2026-07-10 17:34:59 +00:00

75 lines
3.2 KiB
Makefile

## —— Local Native Build using build-rustfs.sh script (Recommended) --------------------------------
.PHONY: build
build: ## Build RustFS binary (includes console by default)
@echo "🔨 Building RustFS using build-rustfs.sh script..."
./build-rustfs.sh
.PHONY: build-dev
build-dev: ## Build RustFS in Development mode
@echo "🔨 Building RustFS in development mode..."
./build-rustfs.sh --dev
.PHONY: build-musl
build-musl: ## Build x86_64 musl version
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl..."
@echo "💡 On macOS/Windows, use 'make build-docker' or 'make docker-dev' instead"
./build-rustfs.sh --platform x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
.PHONY: build-gnu
build-gnu: ## Build x86_64 GNU version
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu..."
@echo "💡 On macOS/Windows, use 'make build-docker' or 'make docker-dev' instead"
./build-rustfs.sh --platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
.PHONY: build-musl-arm64
build-musl-arm64: ## Build aarch64 musl version
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for aarch64-unknown-linux-musl..."
@echo "💡 On macOS/Windows, use 'make build-docker' or 'make docker-dev' instead"
./build-rustfs.sh --platform aarch64-unknown-linux-musl
.PHONY: build-gnu-arm64
build-gnu-arm64: ## Build aarch64 GNU version
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu..."
@echo "💡 On macOS/Windows, use 'make build-docker' or 'make docker-dev' instead"
./build-rustfs.sh --platform aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
## —— Profiling build (dial9 Tokio runtime telemetry) ------------------------------------------
# dial9 hooks Tokio's unstable runtime instrumentation, so it needs
# `--cfg tokio_unstable`. That flag is deliberately absent from
# .cargo/config.toml: it is not free, and release binaries do not carry it.
# Setting RUSTFLAGS here replaces (never appends to) the config-file value, and
# crates/obs/build.rs fails the build if the feature and the flag disagree.
#
# There are no task-dump or S3-upload features — see the notes in
# crates/obs/Cargo.toml for why.
DIAL9_FEATURES ?= dial9
DIAL9_RUSTFLAGS ?= --cfg tokio_unstable
.PHONY: build-profiling
build-profiling: ## Build RustFS with dial9 Tokio runtime telemetry (diagnostic builds only)
@echo "🔬 Building RustFS with dial9 telemetry (features: $(DIAL9_FEATURES))..."
@echo "⚠️ Diagnostic build: telemetry writes trace segments to disk continuously."
RUSTFLAGS="$(DIAL9_RUSTFLAGS)" cargo build --release --bin rustfs --features $(DIAL9_FEATURES)
.PHONY: build-cross-all
build-cross-all: core-deps ## Build binaries for all architectures
@echo "🔧 Building all target architectures..."
@echo "💡 On macOS/Windows, use 'make docker-dev' for reliable multi-arch builds"
@echo "🔨 Generating protobuf code..."
cargo run --bin gproto || true
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl..."
./build-rustfs.sh --platform x86_64-unknown-linux-musl
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu..."
./build-rustfs.sh --platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for aarch64-unknown-linux-musl..."
./build-rustfs.sh --platform aarch64-unknown-linux-musl
@echo "🔨 Building rustfs for aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu..."
./build-rustfs.sh --platform aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu