fix(admin): probe replication-check mutations by the assigned version id

On a target that mints its own version ids the DeleteMarker and
VersionDelete phases of ?replication-check were skipped: they addressed
the source id, which such a target never had. The replication worker now
addresses the id the target assigned (the target-version ledger), and
the probe already holds that id from its own PUT, so run both phases
against it. VersionFidelity keeps failing with the mismatch code and the
target stays FAILED; the phases report whether ledger-addressed purges
work against this endpoint (rustfs/backlog#2340).
This commit is contained in:
唐小鸭
2026-09-07 16:08:55 +08:00
parent 46a387dffe
commit ee73203791
3 changed files with 71 additions and 23 deletions
@@ -9289,11 +9289,13 @@ async fn test_replication_check_flags_version_minting_target() -> TestResult {
fidelity["Code"], "BucketRemoteTargetVersionMismatch",
"the failure must carry a machine-readable code: {payload}"
);
// The probe PUT itself succeeded (fidelity is judged from its response);
// the later mutation phases are pointless against a drifting target and
// must be skipped, but cleanup still runs.
// The probe PUT itself succeeded (fidelity is judged from its response).
// The mutation phases address the id the target assigned — the ledger
// the worker records per object (rustfs/backlog#2340) — so they run and
// pass on a drifting target, and cleanup uses the same id.
assert_eq!(target_report["Phases"]["Put"]["Status"], "OK", "{payload}");
assert_eq!(target_report["Phases"]["DeleteMarker"]["Status"], "SKIPPED", "{payload}");
assert_eq!(target_report["Phases"]["DeleteMarker"]["Status"], "OK", "{payload}");
assert_eq!(target_report["Phases"]["VersionDelete"]["Status"], "OK", "{payload}");
assert_eq!(target_report["Phases"]["Cleanup"]["Status"], "OK", "{payload}");
// The probe PUT must carry the source version as `?versionId=` — the