mirror of
https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs.git
synced 2026-07-26 16:28:15 +00:00
test(e2e): make security boundary tests assert real outcomes (#4466)
* test(e2e): make security boundary tests assert real outcomes * fix(e2e): use expect_err to satisfy clippy err_expect lint
This commit is contained in:
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ mod quota_test;
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod bucket_policy_check_test;
|
||||
|
||||
// Security boundary tests: DoS limits, SSRF prevention, concurrent-write integrity
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod security_boundary_test;
|
||||
|
||||
/// IAM / bucket / STS session policy with `s3:ExistingObjectTag` conditions (E2E).
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod existing_object_tag_policy_test;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,59 +14,94 @@
|
||||
|
||||
//! Security boundary tests for RustFS
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! These tests verify that RustFS properly handles security-sensitive scenarios:
|
||||
//! - DoS protection (large payloads, excessive multipart parts)
|
||||
//! - SSRF prevention (internal URL validation)
|
||||
//! - Race condition handling (concurrent operations)
|
||||
//! These tests verify that RustFS properly enforces security-sensitive
|
||||
//! controls by issuing real requests against a running server and asserting
|
||||
//! the concrete outcome of each control:
|
||||
//! - DoS protection (oversized tagging payloads, excessive multipart parts)
|
||||
//! - SSRF prevention (internal/private endpoints rejected for tiering)
|
||||
//! - Race condition handling (concurrent writes converge without corruption)
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::common;
|
||||
use crate::common::{RustFSTestEnvironment, awscurl_available, awscurl_put, init_logging};
|
||||
use aws_sdk_s3::error::ProvideErrorMetadata;
|
||||
use aws_sdk_s3::primitives::ByteStream;
|
||||
use aws_sdk_s3::types::{CompletedMultipartUpload, CompletedPart};
|
||||
use aws_sdk_s3::types::{CompletedMultipartUpload, CompletedPart, Tag, Tagging};
|
||||
use serial_test::serial;
|
||||
use std::error::Error;
|
||||
use tracing::info;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test that large XML bodies are properly rejected
|
||||
/// Oversized tagging payloads must be rejected by the per-object tag limit.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// RustFS caps object tagging at 10 tags (`InvalidTag`). This protects the
|
||||
/// server against unbounded tagging XML bodies. We transmit a payload that is
|
||||
/// far beyond that limit and assert the server rejects it with the specific
|
||||
/// error, rather than accepting an arbitrarily large control-plane body.
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
#[serial]
|
||||
async fn test_large_xml_body_rejection() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync>> {
|
||||
let ctx = common::TestContext::new("security-large-xml").await?;
|
||||
let client = ctx.client();
|
||||
init_logging();
|
||||
let mut env = RustFSTestEnvironment::new().await?;
|
||||
env.start_rustfs_server(vec![]).await?;
|
||||
let client = env.create_s3_client();
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a bucket first
|
||||
let bucket_name = format!("security-large-xml-{}", uuid::Uuid::new_v4());
|
||||
client.create_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to send a very large XML body (simulating DoS attempt)
|
||||
// This should be rejected by the server's body size limit
|
||||
let large_body = format!("<Tagging><TagSet>{}</TagSet></Tagging>", "<Tag><Key>test</Key><Value>test</Value></Tag>".repeat(10000));
|
||||
let object_key = "oversized-tagging-target";
|
||||
client
|
||||
.put_object()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
.key(object_key)
|
||||
.body(ByteStream::from_static(b"payload"))
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Build a tag set that is well past the enforced 10-tag limit. This is a
|
||||
// genuinely oversized tagging XML body that must be rejected, not a single
|
||||
// in-limit tag.
|
||||
let mut tag_builder = Tagging::builder();
|
||||
for i in 0..500 {
|
||||
tag_builder = tag_builder.tag_set(Tag::builder().key(format!("key-{i}")).value(format!("value-{i}")).build()?);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let oversized_tagging = tag_builder.build()?;
|
||||
|
||||
let result = client
|
||||
.put_bucket_tagging()
|
||||
.put_object_tagging()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
.tagging(aws_sdk_s3::types::Tagging::builder().tag_set(
|
||||
aws_sdk_s3::types::Tag::builder().key("test").value("test").build()?,
|
||||
).build()?)
|
||||
.key(object_key)
|
||||
.tagging(oversized_tagging)
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
|
||||
// Cleanup
|
||||
client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
// Cleanup (best effort) before assertions so a failed assertion still
|
||||
// leaves no residue.
|
||||
let _ = client.delete_object().bucket(&bucket_name).key(object_key).send().await;
|
||||
let _ = client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await;
|
||||
|
||||
// The server should either accept it (if within limits) or reject it gracefully
|
||||
// We're testing that it doesn't crash or hang
|
||||
assert!(result.is_ok() || result.is_err(), "Server should handle large bodies gracefully");
|
||||
assert!(result.is_err(), "Server must reject an oversized tagging payload, but it was accepted");
|
||||
let err = result.expect_err("checked is_err above");
|
||||
let code = err.as_service_error().and_then(|e| e.code());
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
code,
|
||||
Some("InvalidTag"),
|
||||
"Oversized tagging should be rejected with InvalidTag, got code {code:?}, err: {err:?}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
env.stop_server();
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test that excessive multipart parts are properly handled
|
||||
/// Excessive multipart parts must be rejected.
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
#[serial]
|
||||
async fn test_excessive_multipart_parts() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync>> {
|
||||
let ctx = common::TestContext::new("security-multipart").await?;
|
||||
let client = ctx.client();
|
||||
init_logging();
|
||||
let mut env = RustFSTestEnvironment::new().await?;
|
||||
env.start_rustfs_server(vec![]).await?;
|
||||
let client = env.create_s3_client();
|
||||
|
||||
let bucket_name = format!("security-multipart-{}", uuid::Uuid::new_v4());
|
||||
client.create_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a multipart upload
|
||||
let create_result = client
|
||||
.create_multipart_upload()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
@@ -74,136 +109,172 @@ async fn test_excessive_multipart_parts() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error + Send + S
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
let upload_id = create_result.upload_id().expect("upload_id should be present");
|
||||
let upload_id = create_result.upload_id().expect("upload_id should be present").to_string();
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to complete with too many parts (should be rejected)
|
||||
// Try to complete with too many parts (should be rejected).
|
||||
let mut parts = Vec::new();
|
||||
for i in 1..=10001 {
|
||||
parts.push(
|
||||
CompletedPart::builder()
|
||||
.part_number(i)
|
||||
.e_tag(format!("etag-{i}"))
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
parts.push(CompletedPart::builder().part_number(i).e_tag(format!("etag-{i}")).build());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let result = client
|
||||
.complete_multipart_upload()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
.key("test-large")
|
||||
.upload_id(upload_id)
|
||||
.multipart_upload(
|
||||
CompletedMultipartUpload::builder()
|
||||
.set_parts(Some(parts))
|
||||
.build(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.upload_id(&upload_id)
|
||||
.multipart_upload(CompletedMultipartUpload::builder().set_parts(Some(parts)).build())
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
|
||||
// Cleanup
|
||||
// Cleanup.
|
||||
let _ = client
|
||||
.abort_multipart_upload()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
.key("test-large")
|
||||
.upload_id(upload_id)
|
||||
.upload_id(&upload_id)
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
let _ = client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await;
|
||||
|
||||
// The server should reject excessive parts gracefully
|
||||
assert!(result.is_err(), "Server should reject excessive multipart parts");
|
||||
|
||||
env.stop_server();
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test concurrent operations on the same object
|
||||
/// Concurrent writes to the same object must converge without corruption.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We fan out concurrent PUTs of distinct contents and assert every write is
|
||||
/// accepted, then assert the final object is exactly one of the written values
|
||||
/// (last-writer-wins, no torn/garbage state) and that it is absent after a
|
||||
/// subsequent delete.
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
#[serial]
|
||||
async fn test_concurrent_object_operations() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync>> {
|
||||
let ctx = common::TestContext::new("security-concurrent").await?;
|
||||
let client = ctx.client();
|
||||
init_logging();
|
||||
let mut env = RustFSTestEnvironment::new().await?;
|
||||
env.start_rustfs_server(vec![]).await?;
|
||||
let client = env.create_s3_client();
|
||||
|
||||
let bucket_name = format!("security-concurrent-{}", uuid::Uuid::new_v4());
|
||||
client.create_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Upload initial object
|
||||
client
|
||||
.put_object()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_name)
|
||||
.key("concurrent-test")
|
||||
.body(ByteStream::from_static(b"initial content"))
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
let key = "concurrent-test";
|
||||
let writer_count = 10;
|
||||
let expected_contents: Vec<String> = (0..writer_count).map(|i| format!("content-{i}")).collect();
|
||||
|
||||
// Spawn multiple concurrent operations
|
||||
// Fan out concurrent PUTs of distinct contents.
|
||||
let mut handles = Vec::new();
|
||||
for i in 0..10 {
|
||||
for content in expected_contents.iter().cloned() {
|
||||
let client_clone = client.clone();
|
||||
let bucket_clone = bucket_name.clone();
|
||||
handles.push(tokio::spawn(async move {
|
||||
// Concurrent PUT
|
||||
let content = format!("content-{i}");
|
||||
let _ = client_clone
|
||||
client_clone
|
||||
.put_object()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_clone)
|
||||
.key("concurrent-test")
|
||||
.key(key)
|
||||
.body(ByteStream::from(content.into_bytes()))
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
|
||||
// Concurrent GET
|
||||
let _ = client_clone
|
||||
.get_object()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_clone)
|
||||
.key("concurrent-test")
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
|
||||
// Concurrent DELETE (might fail if object doesn't exist)
|
||||
let _ = client_clone
|
||||
.delete_object()
|
||||
.bucket(&bucket_clone)
|
||||
.key("concurrent-test")
|
||||
.send()
|
||||
.await;
|
||||
.await
|
||||
.is_ok()
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for all operations to complete
|
||||
// Every concurrent write must be accepted by the server.
|
||||
for handle in handles {
|
||||
let _ = handle.await;
|
||||
let put_ok = handle.await?;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
put_ok,
|
||||
"A concurrent PUT was rejected; server must accept concurrent writes to the same key"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Cleanup
|
||||
let _ = client.delete_object().bucket(&bucket_name).key("concurrent-test").send().await;
|
||||
client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await?;
|
||||
// The final object must be exactly one of the written contents (no torn or
|
||||
// corrupted state from interleaved writes).
|
||||
let get = client.get_object().bucket(&bucket_name).key(key).send().await?;
|
||||
let body = get.body.collect().await?.into_bytes();
|
||||
let final_content = String::from_utf8(body.to_vec())?;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
expected_contents.contains(&final_content),
|
||||
"Final object content {final_content:?} is not one of the concurrently written values"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// The server should handle concurrent operations without crashing
|
||||
// We don't check for specific results since operations are concurrent
|
||||
// After deletion, the object must be absent.
|
||||
client.delete_object().bucket(&bucket_name).key(key).send().await?;
|
||||
let get_after_delete = client.get_object().bucket(&bucket_name).key(key).send().await;
|
||||
assert!(get_after_delete.is_err(), "Object must be absent after delete");
|
||||
let code = get_after_delete
|
||||
.err()
|
||||
.and_then(|e| e.as_service_error().and_then(|se| se.code()).map(str::to_string));
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
code.as_deref(),
|
||||
Some("NoSuchKey"),
|
||||
"GET after delete should return NoSuchKey, got {code:?}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let _ = client.delete_bucket().bucket(&bucket_name).send().await;
|
||||
|
||||
env.stop_server();
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Test that internal/private URLs are rejected for tiering
|
||||
/// Internal/private endpoints must be rejected as remote tier backends (SSRF).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This issues a real admin AddTier call (`PUT /rustfs/admin/v3/tier`) for each
|
||||
/// internal/private endpoint and asserts the server rejects it (non-2xx, so the
|
||||
/// signed request helper returns an error). An internal endpoint must never be
|
||||
/// accepted as a tier backend. The rejection may originate from explicit
|
||||
/// SSRF/internal-address filtering or from the backend connectivity/credential
|
||||
/// validation performed during AddTier; either way the security-relevant
|
||||
/// outcome — the internal endpoint is not accepted — is asserted here.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The admin API is exercised via signed `awscurl` requests, matching the
|
||||
/// pattern used by the other admin-API E2E tests in this crate; the test is
|
||||
/// skipped when `awscurl` is not installed.
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
#[serial]
|
||||
async fn test_tiering_url_validation() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error + Send + Sync>> {
|
||||
let ctx = common::TestContext::new("security-tiering-url").await?;
|
||||
let client = ctx.client();
|
||||
init_logging();
|
||||
if !awscurl_available() {
|
||||
info!("Skipping tiering URL validation test because awscurl is not available");
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to configure tiering with internal URLs
|
||||
// This should be rejected by the server's SSRF protection
|
||||
let internal_urls = vec![
|
||||
let mut env = RustFSTestEnvironment::new().await?;
|
||||
env.start_rustfs_server(vec![]).await?;
|
||||
|
||||
let tier_url = format!("{}/rustfs/admin/v3/tier", env.url);
|
||||
let internal_endpoints = [
|
||||
"http://127.0.0.1:8080",
|
||||
"http://localhost:8080",
|
||||
"http://169.254.169.254", // AWS metadata endpoint
|
||||
"http://169.254.169.254", // cloud instance metadata endpoint
|
||||
"http://[::1]:8080",
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
for url in internal_urls {
|
||||
// The server should reject internal URLs
|
||||
// We're testing that it doesn't allow SSRF attacks
|
||||
// Note: This test may need to be adjusted based on the actual API
|
||||
println!("Testing internal URL rejection: {url}");
|
||||
for endpoint in internal_endpoints {
|
||||
// AddTier expects an uppercase tier name and a backend configuration.
|
||||
let body = serde_json::json!({
|
||||
"type": "s3",
|
||||
"s3": {
|
||||
"name": "SSRFTEST",
|
||||
"endpoint": endpoint,
|
||||
"accessKey": "ssrf-probe",
|
||||
"secretKey": "ssrf-probe",
|
||||
"bucket": "ssrf-probe-bucket",
|
||||
"prefix": "",
|
||||
"region": "us-east-1",
|
||||
"storageClass": ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
.to_string();
|
||||
|
||||
let result = awscurl_put(&tier_url, &body, &env.access_key, &env.secret_key).await;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
result.is_err(),
|
||||
"AddTier must reject internal endpoint {endpoint}, but it was accepted: {result:?}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
env.stop_server();
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user