gsadmin/rustfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs.git synced 2026-08-25 05:26:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor: NamespaceLock (nslock), AHM→Heal Crate, and Lock/Clippy Fixes (#1664)

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: weisd <2057561+weisd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: houseme <housemecn@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
weisd
2026-01-30 13:13:41 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 1c085590ca
commit dce117840c
80 changed files with 3787 additions and 16746 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
crates/lock/src/fast_lock/shard.rs
+8 -4
View File
@@ -759,13 +759,17 @@ mod tests {
let shard = LockShard::new(0);
// First acquire a lock that will block the batch operation
let blocking_request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write("bucket", "obj1", "blocking_owner");
let blocking_request = ObjectLockRequest::new_write(ObjectKey::new("bucket", "obj1"), "blocking_owner")
.with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_secs(1));
shard.acquire_lock(&blocking_request).await.unwrap();
// Now try a batch operation that should fail and clean up properly
// Use short acquire timeout so the test fails fast when obj1 is already locked
// (default is 60s which would make this test very slow)
let requests = vec![
ObjectLockRequest::new_read("bucket", "obj2", "batch_owner"), // This should succeed
ObjectLockRequest::new_write("bucket", "obj1", "batch_owner"), // This should fail due to existing lock
ObjectLockRequest::new_read(ObjectKey::new("bucket", "obj2"), "batch_owner")
.with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100)), // This should succeed
ObjectLockRequest::new_write(ObjectKey::new("bucket", "obj1"), "batch_owner")
.with_acquire_timeout(Duration::from_millis(100)), // This should fail due to existing lock
];
let result = shard.acquire_locks_batch(requests, true).await;