chore(skills): add repository-local workflow skills (#2190)

.agents/skills/test-coverage-improver/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+name: test-coverage-improver
+description: Run project coverage checks, rank high-risk gaps, and propose high-impact tests to improve regression confidence for changed and critical code paths before release.
+---
+
+# Test Coverage Improver
+
+Use this skill when you need a prioritized, risk-aware plan to improve tests from coverage results.
+
+## Usage assumptions
+- Focus scope is either changed lines/files, a module, or the whole repository.
+- Coverage artifact must be generated or provided in a supported format.
+- If required context is missing, call out assumptions explicitly before proposing work.
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. Define scope and baseline
+   - Confirm target language, framework, and branch.
+   - Confirm whether the scope is changed files only or full-repo.
+
+2. Produce coverage snapshot
+   - Rust: `cargo llvm-cov` (or `cargo tarpaulin`) with existing repo config.
+   - JavaScript/TypeScript: `npm test -- --coverage` and read `coverage/coverage-final.json`.
+   - Python: `pytest --cov=<pkg> --cov-report=json` and read `coverage.json`.
+   - Collect total, per-file, and changed-line coverage.
+
+3. Rank highest-risk gaps
+   - Prioritize changed code, branch coverage gaps, and low-confidence boundaries.
+   - Apply the risk rubric in [coverage-prioritization.md](references/coverage-prioritization.md).
+   - Keep shortlist to 5–8 gaps.
+   - For each gap, capture: file, lines, uncovered branches, and estimated risk score.
+
+4. Propose high-impact tests
+   - For each shortlisted gap, output:
+     - Intent and expected behavior.
+     - Normal, edge, and failure scenarios.
+     - Assertions and side effects to verify.
+     - Setup needs (fixtures, mocks, integration dependencies).
+     - Estimated effort (`S/M/L`).
+
+5. Close with validation plan
+   - State which gaps remain after proposals.
+   - Provide concrete verification command and acceptance threshold.
+   - List assumptions or blockers (environment, fixtures, flaky dependencies).
+
+## Output template
+
+### Coverage Snapshot
+- total / branch coverage
+- changed-file coverage
+- top missing regions by size
+
+### Top Gaps (ranked)
+- `path:line-range` | risk score | why critical
+
+### Test Proposals
+- `path:line-range`
+  - Test name
+  - scenarios
+  - assertions
+  - effort
+
+### Validation Plan
+- command
+- pass criteria
+- remaining risk

.agents/skills/test-coverage-improver/agents/openai.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+interface:
+  display_name: "Test Coverage Improver"
+  short_description: "Find top uncovered risk areas and propose high-impact tests."
+  default_prompt: "Run coverage checks, identify largest gaps, and recommend highest-impact test cases to improve risk coverage."

.agents/skills/test-coverage-improver/references/coverage-prioritization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Coverage Gap Prioritization Guide
+
+Use this rubric for each uncovered area.
+
+Score = (Criticality × 2) + CoverageDebt + (Volatility × 0.5)
+
+- Criticality:
+  - 5: authz/authn, data-loss, payment/consistency path
+  - 4: state mutation, cache invalidation, scheduling
+  - 3: error handling + fallbacks in user-visible flows
+  - 2: parsing/format conversion paths
+  - 1: logging-only or low-impact utilities
+
+- CoverageDebt:
+  - 0: 0–5 uncovered lines
+  - 1: 6–20 uncovered lines
+  - 2: 21–40 uncovered lines
+  - 3: 41+ uncovered lines
+
+- Volatility:
+  - 1: stable legacy code with few recent edits
+  - 2: changed in last 2 releases
+  - 3: touched in last 30 days or currently in active PR
+
+Sort by score descending, then by business impact.