mirror of
https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs.git
synced 2026-08-07 22:03:14 +00:00
fix(admin): allow non-consoleAdmin self password update (#2082)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -70,13 +70,15 @@ impl Policy {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Owner has all permissions
|
||||
if args.is_owner {
|
||||
// DenyOnly mode: only validate explicit Deny statements.
|
||||
// If no Deny matched above, allow the request.
|
||||
if args.deny_only {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if args.deny_only {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Owner has all permissions
|
||||
if args.is_owner {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check Allow statements
|
||||
@@ -603,7 +605,7 @@ mod test {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[tokio::test]
|
||||
async fn test_deny_only_security_fix() -> Result<()> {
|
||||
async fn test_deny_only_checks_only_deny_statements() -> Result<()> {
|
||||
let data = r#"
|
||||
{
|
||||
"Version": "2012-10-17",
|
||||
@@ -621,7 +623,8 @@ mod test {
|
||||
let conditions = HashMap::new();
|
||||
let claims = HashMap::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with deny_only=true but no matching Allow statement
|
||||
// deny_only=true should allow if no Deny statement matches,
|
||||
// even when no Allow statement matches.
|
||||
let args_deny_only = Args {
|
||||
account: "testuser",
|
||||
groups: &None,
|
||||
@@ -631,16 +634,15 @@ mod test {
|
||||
is_owner: false,
|
||||
object: "test.txt",
|
||||
claims: &claims,
|
||||
deny_only: true, // Should NOT automatically allow
|
||||
deny_only: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Should return false because deny_only=true, regardless of whether there's a matching Allow statement
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!policy.is_allowed(&args_deny_only).await,
|
||||
"deny_only should return false when deny_only=true, regardless of Allow statements"
|
||||
policy.is_allowed(&args_deny_only).await,
|
||||
"deny_only should allow when no Deny statement matches"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with deny_only=true and matching Allow statement
|
||||
// deny_only=true should also allow when action matches Allow statement.
|
||||
let args_deny_only_allowed = Args {
|
||||
account: "testuser",
|
||||
groups: &None,
|
||||
@@ -653,13 +655,12 @@ mod test {
|
||||
deny_only: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Should return false because deny_only=true prevents checking Allow statements (unless is_owner=true)
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!policy.is_allowed(&args_deny_only_allowed).await,
|
||||
"deny_only should return false even with matching Allow statement"
|
||||
policy.is_allowed(&args_deny_only_allowed).await,
|
||||
"deny_only should allow when no Deny statement matches, even if Allow exists"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with deny_only=false (normal case)
|
||||
// Normal policy evaluation remains unchanged when deny_only=false.
|
||||
let args_normal = Args {
|
||||
account: "testuser",
|
||||
groups: &None,
|
||||
@@ -678,21 +679,40 @@ mod test {
|
||||
"normal policy evaluation should allow with matching Allow statement"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Explicit Deny must still block request in deny_only mode.
|
||||
let deny_policy_data = r#"
|
||||
{
|
||||
"Version": "2012-10-17",
|
||||
"Statement": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"Effect": "Deny",
|
||||
"Action": ["s3:PutObject"],
|
||||
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bucket2/*"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
"#;
|
||||
let deny_policy = Policy::parse_config(deny_policy_data.as_bytes())?;
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!deny_policy.is_allowed(&args_deny_only).await,
|
||||
"deny_only should reject request when an explicit Deny matches"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let args_owner_deny_only = Args {
|
||||
account: "testuser",
|
||||
groups: &None,
|
||||
action: Action::S3Action(crate::policy::action::S3Action::PutObjectAction),
|
||||
bucket: "bucket2",
|
||||
conditions: &conditions,
|
||||
is_owner: true, // Owner has all permissions
|
||||
is_owner: true,
|
||||
object: "test.txt",
|
||||
claims: &claims,
|
||||
deny_only: true, // Even with deny_only=true, owner should be allowed
|
||||
deny_only: true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
policy.is_allowed(&args_owner_deny_only).await,
|
||||
"owner should retain all permissions even when deny_only=true"
|
||||
"deny_only should allow when no Deny statement matches, including owner requests"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user