gsadmin/rustfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs.git synced 2026-08-21 11:56:38 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(storage-api): remove namespace lock from StorageAPI (#3365)

Browse Source 
* refactor(storage-api): remove namespace lock from StorageAPI

* test(scanner): wait for runtime budget cancellation

---------

Co-authored-by: loverustfs <hello@rustfs.com>
This commit is contained in:
安正超
2026-06-11 22:42:12 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 82af181dcf
commit a85cc0354c
14 changed files with 126 additions and 106 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
crates/ecstore/src/store_api/traits.rs
-13
View File
@@ -179,25 +179,12 @@ pub trait NamespaceLocking: Send + Sync + Debug + 'static {
async fn new_ns_lock(&self, bucket: &str, object: &str) -> Result<NamespaceLockWrapper>;
}
#[async_trait::async_trait]
impl<T> NamespaceLocking for T
where
T: StorageAPI + ?Sized + 'static,
{
async fn new_ns_lock(&self, bucket: &str, object: &str) -> Result<NamespaceLockWrapper> {
StorageAPI::new_ns_lock(self, bucket, object).await
}
}
/// Unified storage API combining all operation groups.
///
/// Consumers can depend on specific sub-traits (e.g., `BucketOperations`)
/// when they don't need the full API surface.
#[async_trait::async_trait]
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
pub trait StorageAPI:
ObjectIO + BucketOperations + ObjectOperations + ListOperations + MultipartOperations + HealOperations + Debug
{
// RUSTFS_COMPAT_TODO(API-012): keep old StorageAPI lock callers compiling while namespace-lock-only consumers migrate. Remove after namespace-lock-only consumers depend on NamespaceLocking and StorageAPI no longer owns namespace locking.
async fn new_ns_lock(&self, bucket: &str, object: &str) -> Result<NamespaceLockWrapper>;
}