* refactor(linters): add prefer-coerce-array rule
Refs #45217
`x ?? []` and `coerceArray(x)` say the same thing, but only the second
one is searchable and consistent. The rule flags a `??` whose default is
a bare `[]` literal; a non-empty default or an asserted `([] as Foo[])`
still passes.
Applying it across `lib/` surfaced three spots the helper cannot cover,
which keep `?? []` with a disable comment or a narrower fix:
- `package-files.ts` destructures a tuple, which `coerceArray()` widens
- `generate.spec.ts` defaults `matchAll()`, an iterator rather than an array
- `mise/upgradeable-tooling.ts` declares a `Record` return, so its
`?? []` fallback was wrong to begin with and becomes `coerceObject()`
* refactor(platform/github): hoist the GHE version header lookup
`Object.entries(...).find()` returns a tuple, and defaulting it with
`?? []` only to destructure the second element reads as an array
default when it is not one. Name the found entry instead, which drops
the `?? []` rather than routing a tuple through `coerceArray()`.
* feat(lint): add renovate/prefer-is-helpers and renovate/prefer-is-object rules
Flag ad-hoc type checks that have @sindresorhus/is equivalents:
- .filter(Boolean) -> .filter(isTruthy)
- typeof x === 'string' -> isString(x)
- x === null || x === undefined -> isNullOrUndefined(x) (and negation)
The typeof x === 'object' shape lives in a separate suggestion-only rule
(renovate/prefer-is-object, kept at warn) because isObject()/isPlainObject()
are not drop-in equivalents: null, arrays and functions behave differently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor: fix renovate/prefer-is-helpers violations
Replace ad-hoc type checks with @sindresorhus/is helpers across lib/:
- 13x .filter(Boolean) -> .filter(isTruthy)
- 36x typeof x ==/!== 'string' -> isString(x) / !isString(x)
- 6x x === null || x === undefined -> isNullOrUndefined(x) (and negation)
Promote renovate/prefer-is-helpers to error now that the codebase is clean.
renovate/prefer-is-object stays at warn: its 15 remaining sites guard
parsed YAML/JSON or unknown values where isObject()/isPlainObject() are
not provably equivalent (null/array/function semantics).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor: enforce renovate/prefer-is-object at error level
Resolve the 15 remaining warnings and raise the rule from warn to error:
- Migrate 10 sites to isObject() where the guarded value provably cannot
be a function (parsed YAML/JSON, typed exec command arguments, or
test-controlled fixtures): helm-values, woodpecker, bun, pre-commit
managers, exec utils, file package cache, and the github http spec.
In the bun manager this also fixes a latent crash where a null
`workspaces` value would throw on the `in` operator.
- Keep 5 sites as reasoned oxlint-disable comments where excluding
functions is load-bearing: the byte-exact fingerprint canonicalizer
(2), the circularity walker, the zod result guard, and the generic
hasKey helper.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci(linter): add renovate/no-host-rules-mock rule
Flags vi.mock()/vi.doMock() calls whose module specifier contains
"host-rules" in spec files. Tests should configure real rules via
hostRules.add() instead of mocking the host-rules module.
Enabled at "warn" severity instead of "error": the repo currently has
35 pre-existing violations across 34 spec files, which exceeds the
agreed fix threshold of 12 files. No violation fixes are included;
migrating each spec to real hostRules.add()/clear() setup is a
semantic test rewrite that should be done incrementally, after which
the rule can be promoted to "error".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci(linter): enforce renovate/no-host-rules-mock at error
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(datasource): use real host-rules instead of mocking
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(manager): use real host-rules instead of mocking
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(platform): use real host-rules instead of mocking
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(util,workers): use real host-rules instead of mocking
Also narrow renovate/no-host-rules-mock to the host-rules module itself so that mocking e.g. host-rules-from-env is not flagged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci(linter): mention '~test/host-rules.ts' util in no-host-rules-mock message
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
A long-standing question we receive is "what `depTypes` can I match
against in my project".
Although the best recommendation we usually have is "check the
`packageFiles with updates" log line (as a very key log line for users),
we can go one step further and try and create a stronger contract.
To do this, I've used Claude Sonnet 4.6 to work through the codebase,
determine areas that a `depType` is set in a manager (statically or
dynamically) and generate a structured, typed, means to document how
they're used.
Through a few iterations of the process, and attempts at human-written
documentation, we've settled on:
- prioritising autogenerated documentation (for humans to read) to note
what `depTypes` are known, and what they are
- `knownDepTypes`, to describe any known, static, `depType`s and their
human-readable meaning
- with the `prettyDepType`, if used
- `supportsDynamicDepTypesNote`, to add a Markdown note to the generated
documentation
While here, we also:
- make sure to note this in the "adding a new package manager"
documentation
- remove any hand-written references to `depTypes` in each manager's
documentation page
- correct the Gleam `depTypes`
- make sure to use the `knownDepTypes`'s `prettyDepType` definition if
we know it, for a given `depType`
The descriptions have been generated by Claude Sonnet, with some
human-written tweaks where appropriate.
[0]: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions/15176
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* fixup! docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
* docs(manager): display `depTypes` documentation if none present
For consistency, and to make it more explicit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
Renames `lookupName` to be `packageName`.
BREAKING CHANGE: Use `packageName` instead of `lookupName` if interacting with Renovate datasources directly.
Sebastian Poxhofer