* docs: skip validation on JSON files that aren't Renovate config
As part of future changes, we'll enable validation on all JSON code
snippets to run Config Validation.
Before we do that, we should opt-out JSON snippets that aren't anything
related to Renovate config.
* docs: don't validate invalid Renovate config
As it's intentionally referencing a manager that doesn't exist.
* docs: don't validate partial Renovate config
As part of future changes, we'll enable validation on all JSON code
snippets to run Config Validation.
There are several code snippets we have that are part of a Renovate JSON,
but it doesn't make sense to convert these to a fully passing config, as
it'd reduce clarity on what we're trying to explain.
* docs: convert `baseBranchPatterns` snippets to code blocks
So we can validate them.
* docs: make sure that `datasourceTemplate` is set
So this passes validation.
* docs: clarify that `force` is global config
As it may not be clear, so we can make it extra clear with a `.js` file,
and note that it's global self-hosted config.
* docs: make sure `packageRules` is an array
* docs: `matchBaseBranches` needs `baseBranchPatterns` to be set
* docs: correct typo for `prBodyColumns`
* docs: mark global config snippets as such
As part of future changes, we'll use this to detect whether it's global
self-hosted configuration.
* docs: make sure `packageRules` wraps its children
* docs: add `allowedHeaders`
* docs: ignore deprecation warnings
As part of future changes, we'll use this to note that we don't care
about the validation warnings.
* docs: make sure `customManagers` wraps its children
* docs: make sure `fleet` wraps its children
* docs: validate JSON snippets are valid Renovate config
To make sure that we're always presenting valid JSON configuration to
our users, we can validate them as part of `check-fenced-code`.
As well as configuration errors we can warn for warnings, but allow code
blocks to opt-out, for instance when there's a known deprecation
affecting the code block.
We need to make sure to set `allowedEnv` for various code snippets that
reference environment variables.
* docs(development): document fenced code block checks
* docs: wrap `configType` and `ignoreConfigWarnings` in `{ ... }`
As otherwise we see build failures i.e.
WARNING - Doc file 'modules/platform/gitlab/index.md' contains a link
'../../../self-hosted-configuration.md#autodiscoverrepoorder', but the doc
'self-hosted-configuration.md' does not contain an anchor '#autodiscoverrepoorder'.
This needs to be wrapped alongside all other options like `title`.
* fixup! docs: wrap `configType` and `ignoreConfigWarnings` in `{ ... }`
* ci: add local mkdocs-admonitions plugin for prettier to allow admonition preservation
* docs: remove uses of `prettier-ignore` for admonitions
* test: rather use await expect
* chore: use named group exclusively
* docs: ensure 2 spaces used for generated admonitions
As a follow-up to 4b0146ab7b and
1844916259b6dc17f532e491eb93f6116327c324., this correctly renders
admonitions with 2 spaces (1 indent).
* fixup! docs: use 2-space indentation for Markdown (#43537)
Plus using 3-space for mixed-style `<ul>` and `<ol>`s.
* fixup! docs: use 2-space indentation for Markdown (#43537)
As otherwise it breaks the rendering of the table.
* refactor(platform): programatically mark Platforms as experimental
As part of future changes, we'll want to be able to more
straightforwardly determine whether a given Platform is experimental.
To do this, we can add a new optional `experimental` flag to the
`Platform`.
As part of having this available, we can refactor how our docs for
Platforms are built, and replace a hand-authored experimental notice, we
can automagically insert it into the built docs.
To make sure that we don't break the rendering of the Markdown for
Mkdocs, we need to insert the experimental notice after the page
heading.
As we're now using the Platform itself, not only the ID, we need to
refactor how `tools/docs/platforms.ts` renders the pages.
* docs(platforms): clarify which Platforms are experimental (#41249)
* chore: format code block
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de>
Jamie Tanna