* refactor(linters): add prefer-coerce-array rule
Refs #45217
`x ?? []` and `coerceArray(x)` say the same thing, but only the second
one is searchable and consistent. The rule flags a `??` whose default is
a bare `[]` literal; a non-empty default or an asserted `([] as Foo[])`
still passes.
Applying it across `lib/` surfaced three spots the helper cannot cover,
which keep `?? []` with a disable comment or a narrower fix:
- `package-files.ts` destructures a tuple, which `coerceArray()` widens
- `generate.spec.ts` defaults `matchAll()`, an iterator rather than an array
- `mise/upgradeable-tooling.ts` declares a `Record` return, so its
`?? []` fallback was wrong to begin with and becomes `coerceObject()`
* refactor(platform/github): hoist the GHE version header lookup
`Object.entries(...).find()` returns a tuple, and defaulting it with
`?? []` only to destructure the second element reads as an array
default when it is not one. Name the found entry instead, which drops
the `?? []` rather than routing a tuple through `coerceArray()`.
* refactor(types): document `localDir` isn't a `globalOnly` option
To make sure that it's clear when reviewing `GlobalConfig`, as well as
working with our types, we can move the `localDir` definition into a
separate type.
* fixup! refactor(types): document `localDir` isn't a `globalOnly` option
* fixup! refactor(types): document `localDir` isn't a `globalOnly` option
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* fixup! refactor(types): document `localDir` isn't a `globalOnly` option
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* fixup! refactor(types): document `localDir` isn't a `globalOnly` option
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
A long-standing question we receive is "what `depTypes` can I match
against in my project".
Although the best recommendation we usually have is "check the
`packageFiles with updates" log line (as a very key log line for users),
we can go one step further and try and create a stronger contract.
To do this, I've used Claude Sonnet 4.6 to work through the codebase,
determine areas that a `depType` is set in a manager (statically or
dynamically) and generate a structured, typed, means to document how
they're used.
Through a few iterations of the process, and attempts at human-written
documentation, we've settled on:
- prioritising autogenerated documentation (for humans to read) to note
what `depTypes` are known, and what they are
- `knownDepTypes`, to describe any known, static, `depType`s and their
human-readable meaning
- with the `prettyDepType`, if used
- `supportsDynamicDepTypesNote`, to add a Markdown note to the generated
documentation
While here, we also:
- make sure to note this in the "adding a new package manager"
documentation
- remove any hand-written references to `depTypes` in each manager's
documentation page
- correct the Gleam `depTypes`
- make sure to use the `knownDepTypes`'s `prettyDepType` definition if
we know it, for a given `depType`
The descriptions have been generated by Claude Sonnet, with some
human-written tweaks where appropriate.
[0]: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions/15176
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* fixup! docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
* docs(manager): display `depTypes` documentation if none present
For consistency, and to make it more explicit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
Sebastian Poxhofer