* feat(managers/pep621): update pixi.lock if present
* test(managers/pep621): cover pixi requires-pixi from workspace table
* refactor(manager/pixi): extract shared pixi.lock update helper
* test(manager/pep621): use arrange-act-assert spacing in pixi tests
* refactor(manager/pixi): revert shared pixi.lock helper extraction
Move the extraction of the shared pixi.lock update helper into a
follow-up PR, as requested in review. The pep621 pixi processor and the
pixi manager again carry their own lock-update logic.
This reverts commit 743db204f2.
* feat(manager/pep621): gate pixi.lock updates behind allowedUnsafeExecutions
`pixi lock` can execute arbitrary code from conda package hooks, so the
pep621 manager now only updates `pixi.lock` when `pixi` is included in the
global `allowedUnsafeExecutions` option, following the same pattern as the
`mise` manager. When `pixi` is not allowed, PEP 621 dependencies in
`pyproject.toml` are still updated but `pixi.lock` is left unchanged.
https://pixi.prefix.dev/latest/security/#4-treat-package-hooks-as-code-execution
* feat(manager/pixi)!: gate pixi.lock updates behind allowedUnsafeExecutions
The pixi manager runs `pixi lock`, which can execute arbitrary code from
conda package hooks. Like the pep621 manager, it now only updates
`pixi.lock` when `pixi` is included in the global `allowedUnsafeExecutions`
option. When it is not allowed, the package file is still updated but
`pixi.lock` is left unchanged.
https://pixi.prefix.dev/latest/security/#4-treat-package-hooks-as-code-execution
BREAKING CHANGE: The `pixi` manager no longer updates `pixi.lock`
automatically. To keep `pixi.lock` updated, add `pixi` to the global
`allowedUnsafeExecutions` option.
* docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
A long-standing question we receive is "what `depTypes` can I match
against in my project".
Although the best recommendation we usually have is "check the
`packageFiles with updates" log line (as a very key log line for users),
we can go one step further and try and create a stronger contract.
To do this, I've used Claude Sonnet 4.6 to work through the codebase,
determine areas that a `depType` is set in a manager (statically or
dynamically) and generate a structured, typed, means to document how
they're used.
Through a few iterations of the process, and attempts at human-written
documentation, we've settled on:
- prioritising autogenerated documentation (for humans to read) to note
what `depTypes` are known, and what they are
- `knownDepTypes`, to describe any known, static, `depType`s and their
human-readable meaning
- with the `prettyDepType`, if used
- `supportsDynamicDepTypesNote`, to add a Markdown note to the generated
documentation
While here, we also:
- make sure to note this in the "adding a new package manager"
documentation
- remove any hand-written references to `depTypes` in each manager's
documentation page
- correct the Gleam `depTypes`
- make sure to use the `knownDepTypes`'s `prettyDepType` definition if
we know it, for a given `depType`
The descriptions have been generated by Claude Sonnet, with some
human-written tweaks where appropriate.
[0]: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions/15176
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
* fixup! docs: explicitly document `depTypes` each manager supports
* docs(manager): display `depTypes` documentation if none present
For consistency, and to make it more explicit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <jamie.tanna+claude-code@mend.io>
Niels Pardon