mirror of
https://github.com/projectsend/projectsend.git
synced 2026-09-17 17:15:08 +00:00
Ignacio Nelson
046be36861
FoldersController::destroy() authorized delete on the folder and nothing else, while FolderService::delete() soft-deletes every file in the subtree and File's deleted hook takes the bytes off disk. So a staff member refused a file one route over could destroy it by deleting the folder around it -- permission and library boundary both unasked. MyFoldersController::destroy() already draws this line for the client half of the same cascade, and says why: owning the folder is not authority over content someone else put in it. This is the staff half of that sentence. Verified before merging: the four bug tests fail on main and pass here, and the SQL predicate was read line by line against FilePolicy::delete -- it is a faithful negation, including the null-uploader case and the short-circuit for an unscoped viewer holding both delete permissions. Membership of the check is one COUNT, not a policy call per file. Suite at 2099, PHPStan clean. Behaviour change, deliberately accepted: a folder delete that used to succeed now refuses, naming how many files are in the way. The likely case is somebody who owns a folder another account uploaded into. The alternative is irreversible loss of files the same person is refused individually. Not taken: deleting what the actor may and keeping the rest. Half a tree is worse than either answer. Naming the blocking files would be friendlier than counting them and is worth doing later -- the list has to hide any file the viewer cannot see, which is its own small design question. Reported and fixed by @denkfabrik-li.