mirror of
https://github.com/projectsend/projectsend.git
synced 2026-09-17 00:55:07 +00:00
ignacionelson
144f5fc578
Two different things stop a selected file being changed in a bulk edit, and bulkUpdate() reported both as the first one. Files dropped by the Gate::allows('update') filter are ones this staff member may not edit at all. A file that survives the filter and still changes nothing is a different case: it was editable, and every field they asked to change is one their role does not let them set -- expiry, download limit and categories each sit behind their own permission here, exactly as they do in the single-file editor. So a staff member with edit_files but without set_file_expiration_date, editing three files they own, was told "0 of 3 selected files were updated. The rest were skipped because you don't have permission to edit them." They own all three, and editing is precisely what they may do: the sentence was both wrong and unactionable, since nothing in it points at the permission that actually stopped the edit.
The two cases get their own sentences now. Every skip being a file they may not edit keeps the existing string, unchanged, so its sixteen translations stay in use. Anything else gets a new one, "because you don't have permission to make those changes", which is also true when both reasons are in play, so a mixed selection is described correctly rather than approximately. Which files get changed is untouched, as is the silent-skip convention and the 422 when nothing at all is authorised.
Verified before merging: 14 passed on the trial-merge, 2 failed / 12 passed with app/ reset -- the field-permission case and the mixture. The pure edit-permission case is green either way, which is what says the existing message was not disturbed. FilesController overlaps #1728, already merged, and its expiryDateFor work is intact in the merged tree.
The new string arrived English-only; the sixteen catalogs are filled in the commit that follows.
Reported and fixed by @denkfabrik-li.