ignacionelson 0a7330d5cd Accept a CLA signature that has line breaks after it ...

The CLA job only ran for a comment exactly equal to the signing phrase.
@JensS signed on #1792 with the phrase followed by line breaks
("...sign the CLA\r\n\r\n\n"), the comparison failed, the job was
skipped, and the signature was never recorded, so all three of his pull
requests still show the CLA as unsigned.

The action itself matches the phrase loosely. The filter in front of it
now does too: contains() for the signature, startsWith() for recheck,
both case-insensitive. It still keeps the job off ordinary comments,
which is what it is there for.

2026-09-21 18:21:04 -03:00

..

screenshots

Add a dark-mode dashboard screenshot (#1625)

2026-08-14 16:39:26 -03:00

workflows

Accept a CLA signature that has line breaks after it

2026-09-21 18:21:04 -03:00