A staff member limited to their own assigned clients could read the names
and ids of clients on nobody's roster but their own, out of ordinary file
metadata.
The file boundary was never wrong. Sharing means a file can legitimately
reach a scoped viewer through client A while client B uploaded it, or
while B also receives it -- StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles is right to
permit that, and a B-only file is still a 403. What was wrong is that
every response then went on to name B. FileResource serialised the loaded
uploader and each assignment unfiltered; ShareTargets::assigned took no
viewer at all, so the details panel published the recipient list as it
stands and forSubject narrowed available_clients while handing
assigned_clients straight through. FoldersController::fileRow,
FilesController::edit, FileDetailsController and ClientFilesController
each named the uploader the same way. The API's uploaded_by filter asked
the question without any name attached: it answered "does this client of
yours put files in front of a client of mine" for any id a caller cared
to try.
12a8ebe3 said the rule out loud while fixing topClientsByStorage -- "the
file was theirs to read and the uploader's name was not theirs to see" --
and then the rule stayed in that widget. So it is a class now.
ClientIdentityScope is the one decision, asked by every surface that
names a client, and it deliberately answers about clients only: a
colleague's name is not a client identity, and hiding it would hide who
uploaded most of the library from the people who work in it. Groups go
through it too, on the same argument -- a group is a list of clients
wearing one name -- which the report did not cover but is the same leak.
Two judgement calls worth naming. assigned() keeps returning the whole
truth and gains a warning, because VisibleCommentScope resolves
notification recipients from it and a recipient filtered out of that list
is one who never hears about a message addressed to them; assignedFor()
is the display half. And FileResource asks at serialisation rather than
in its callers' eager loads, which is the opposite of how the version
counterparts next door are narrowed: that one is set-shaped and folds
into a query, this one is a per-row roster check across eight call sites
in four controllers, two of them re-loading assignments after a write.
The tests assert on whole response bodies rather than on named keys. The
leak was never in one field -- the same name arrived through the
uploader, through the recipient list and through four screens -- so a
body that does not contain the name anywhere is the only assertion that
would have caught all of it. Ten of the eighteen fail without this
change; the rest are the negative controls, including that an unscoped
administrator still sees every name and that the uploaded_by filter still
works for a client on the roster and for staff.
Reported by @Noorkhalel, GHSA-whmp-p9hv-r7j7. Their write-up named every
affected surface and the root cause in each, which is most of why this
took one pass.
#1698 moved the library boundary into FileCommentPolicy, where it
belongs, and said plainly what that cost: the moderation screen went
from 65 queries to 465 for a client-scoped moderator with five assigned
clients. Measured here, those numbers are exactly right.
The cost is not in asking. It is that StaffLibraryScope::files() rebuilds
its query every time, and building one runs four immediate lookups per
assigned client — the client's group ids, the same ids again inside
Folder::sharedFolderIds(), that method's own assignment lookup, and the
shared-folder get() in Folder::scopeVisibleToClient(). None of them
depend on the query being built. Gate resolves a fresh policy for every
check, so a listing paid for all of it once per row.
The built query is now memoised per user and handed back as a clone,
since every caller adds to it, and the scope is registered as `scoped`
rather than transient so the memo survives a request. Scoped rather than
a singleton on purpose: a long-lived queue worker keeps singletons
between jobs, and a library query built from one job's data has no
business answering the next one's question.
That is 465 queries down to 60 on the same page — below the 65 it cost
before #1698, because the memo also helps the callers that were already
asking repeatedly. FileVersions::sharedAudience(), which runs the same
helper twice per candidate while resolving notification recipients, gets
it for free.
So the answer to the question #1698 left open is neither of the two it
offered. can_delete stays a real question asked of the policy; nothing
restates the boundary; and the page is faster than it was before the
fix. Three tests: one user's query never answers another's, one caller's
constraints never follow the next, and the moderation screen does not
ask once per row.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
ignacionelson