Staff keep seeing every file they always saw — withholding is about
recipients, not about the library — so the library now carries the state
on the row: Checking, Quarantined, Released, or Not scanned with the
reason behind it. Nothing at all for a clean file, which is the common
case.
The API says the same in a `scan` object on every file, with an
`available` flag so a caller need not learn which of six states mean
"you can have it", and `scan_status` is a filter, so an integration can
wait for the file it just uploaded or collect what is in quarantine.
The download endpoint answers 423 for a file that is not available,
which it already did through the shared controller.
Re-exported the OpenAPI document.
Laravel's `date` rule accepts a JSON number when it reads as a real day
(20301231 passes) and hands it on unconverted. Every file expiry field
then passes it to a method that only takes a string, so the request
failed with a 500 instead of a validation error.
Affected: PATCH /api/v1/files/{file}, the staff file editor, the bulk
editor, new share links and the client file editor. Each now also
requires `string`, so a number is a 422 on `expires_at`. Dates sent as
text behave exactly as before. A form never sent a number, so this was
only reachable with a hand-written JSON body.
Reported by @skeletonsec as GHSA-rxf8-wh8v-jm9j.
A file in a public folder is public: isEffectivelyPublic() is "my own flag,
or my folder's", read up the whole ancestry. GHSA-237r-jx85-j3hr settled
that three days ago, put the rule in Folder::uploadableBy(), and wired it
into the upload paths.
Content arrives in a folder four other ways. move() drags one file in,
bulkUpdate() moves a selection, update() reparents through the edit form,
and FoldersController::move() drags a whole folder — every file in its
subtree — under a public parent. Each of them asked whether the destination
was *visible* to the mover and then wrote folder_id. Visible is not the same
question as publishable, and the difference is the entire permission: a
staff member given editing rights and deliberately not given upload_public
could publish confidential files to the anonymous site by choosing where
they landed. The API twin of update() had the same gap.
Both earlier advisories named these paths in their own "suggested fix"
sections. Neither demonstrated them, so neither was followed. The fix to a
report wants the scrutiny the report got, and this one did not get it.
The predicate did not need changing — it needed calling. Four sinks now ask
it, plus the API twin. The check stays split in two deliberately: the
destination is resolved through StaffLibraryScope as before, so a folder
somebody cannot see is still a 404 and not an existence oracle, and the
publication clause is a separate 403 on top. They agree by construction —
allowsFolder() is folders()->whereKey()->exists() — so nothing that used to
resolve can now fail the first half.
On the file paths the check fires only when folder_id actually changes,
which is the convention already there: re-saving a file that sits in a
folder out of the saver's scope must keep working. bulkUpdate() checks its
destination once instead, before the loop, because there is one destination
for the batch and if it publishes then no file in the batch may go.
Folder::uploadableBy()'s docblock now says to read the name as "may place
into", with why: the name is what made this easy to miss, and the next
folder_id or parent_id write will be written by somebody reading it.
Ten tests, one per sink with a private-destination control beside it, plus
an editor who *can* publish to show the boundary is about publishing and not
about moving. The last one follows the advisory's own chain to the end and
asserts the thing actually claimed — a stranger with no session, no token
and no assignment fetching the anonymous download URL. It returns 200 on the
code before this commit and 404 after.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CNFU55Tkq6MuEQ73nbbBRx
A client could upload a file and then never touch it again. No rename, no
description, no expiry, no categories, no delete — the portal has three
file routes and all three are GET. Meanwhile the Roles screen happily
grants the Client role edit_files, delete_files, set_file_categories,
set_file_expiration_date and upload_public, and every one of them was
inert, because the routes that honour them are `staff`-gated rather than
permission-gated. That is what #1771 hit: a permission granted, saved, and
silently doing nothing.
A client owns what they uploaded. Ownership is now what lets them edit and
delete it, subject to the same per-field keys staff are subject to.
The obvious implementation is a trap, and it is worth writing down. Both
policy methods began `if (! $user->isStaff()) return false;` and both end
in StaffLibraryScope, whose allowsFile() reads `if (! isClientScoped())
return true` — and isClientScoped() is `isStaff() && role->client_scoped`,
so it is false for every client. Delete the early return and a client
falls into the branch meaning "this staff member is unrestricted" and is
handed the whole library. Same for folders(), which returns an unfiltered
query: a client could move their file into any folder on the installation.
So clients get their own branch, reaching neither. The portal asks
Folder::uploadableBy() instead — a file cannot be moved somewhere it could
not have been uploaded.
edit_others_files and delete_others_files stay inert for clients by
construction. A client has no others' files, only files somebody showed
them, and being shown a file is not being given it.
Which fields an editor may write moved into ApplyFileEdits, shared by the
staff editor, /api/v1 and the portal. There were two copies of the same
eight permission checks and this would have been the third; the checks are
easy, which is exactly why the drift would have been invisible. Callers
normalise their own request shape, this gates and writes and logs. Expiry
reading and writing came along too, as FileExpiry — three copies, of which
only the API's could read a timestamp.
Clients do not choose the public slug. It is derived from the name they
already picked, because an installation-wide unique slug a client sets is
a name to squat and an existence oracle to probe with.
One consequence for later, written up in docs/api-todo.md: the policy now
says yes to a client for file writes, so `staff-token` is the only thing
holding the API boundary where there used to be two independent refusals.
ActorBoundaryTest pins it, and asserts the policy passes first so the test
cannot quietly stop testing the middleware.
Also corrects a stale comment that claimed a deleted file's bytes stay on
disk. They have not since File::booted() grew a `deleted` hook; nothing
ever forceDelete()s a File row, so "until a purge lands" would have meant
never — which is why a client's delete frees their quota by exactly what
it frees on disk.
The UI comes next; this is the authorization, the routes and the tests.
Fixes#1771
A staff member limited to their own assigned clients could read the names
and ids of clients on nobody's roster but their own, out of ordinary file
metadata.
The file boundary was never wrong. Sharing means a file can legitimately
reach a scoped viewer through client A while client B uploaded it, or
while B also receives it -- StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles is right to
permit that, and a B-only file is still a 403. What was wrong is that
every response then went on to name B. FileResource serialised the loaded
uploader and each assignment unfiltered; ShareTargets::assigned took no
viewer at all, so the details panel published the recipient list as it
stands and forSubject narrowed available_clients while handing
assigned_clients straight through. FoldersController::fileRow,
FilesController::edit, FileDetailsController and ClientFilesController
each named the uploader the same way. The API's uploaded_by filter asked
the question without any name attached: it answered "does this client of
yours put files in front of a client of mine" for any id a caller cared
to try.
12a8ebe3 said the rule out loud while fixing topClientsByStorage -- "the
file was theirs to read and the uploader's name was not theirs to see" --
and then the rule stayed in that widget. So it is a class now.
ClientIdentityScope is the one decision, asked by every surface that
names a client, and it deliberately answers about clients only: a
colleague's name is not a client identity, and hiding it would hide who
uploaded most of the library from the people who work in it. Groups go
through it too, on the same argument -- a group is a list of clients
wearing one name -- which the report did not cover but is the same leak.
Two judgement calls worth naming. assigned() keeps returning the whole
truth and gains a warning, because VisibleCommentScope resolves
notification recipients from it and a recipient filtered out of that list
is one who never hears about a message addressed to them; assignedFor()
is the display half. And FileResource asks at serialisation rather than
in its callers' eager loads, which is the opposite of how the version
counterparts next door are narrowed: that one is set-shaped and folds
into a query, this one is a per-row roster check across eight call sites
in four controllers, two of them re-loading assignments after a write.
The tests assert on whole response bodies rather than on named keys. The
leak was never in one field -- the same name arrived through the
uploader, through the recipient list and through four screens -- so a
body that does not contain the name anywhere is the only assertion that
would have caught all of it. Ten of the eighteen fail without this
change; the rest are the negative controls, including that an unscoped
administrator still sees every name and that the uploaded_by filter still
works for a client on the roster and for staff.
Reported by @Noorkhalel, GHSA-whmp-p9hv-r7j7. Their write-up named every
affected surface and the root cause in each, which is most of why this
took one pass.
File::isExpired() documented the rule the whole application is supposed to follow: once past, the file is hidden from clients and the public site but staff keep full access. The second half is not true of a client-scoped staff member. StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles() builds their library as own uploads plus what each assigned client may see, and that second half runs through File::scopeVisibleToClient, which ends in notExpired() -- a client-side rule. So an expired file they held only through a client leaves their library and answers 403 on download, while their own expired upload stays and an unscoped administrator is unaffected. Api\FilesController stated it the same way, "Only the client branch of the visibility rules drops them", which reads as though a staff caller is unaffected when a client-scoped one is reached through that very branch.
This does not change that behaviour. c8078f65 weighed widening it and decided against, because scopeVisibleToClient is the single source of truth for client file access and the highest-stakes function to go changing for a dashboard widget, and relabelled the widget instead. That decision lived in a commit message and one widget's label; nothing in the code said it, and the docblock nearest the rule went on promising the opposite -- which is how the next person re-derives "staff keep full access" and widens the scope to match.
Documentation and characterisation only. isExpired() now states the boundary and why it is where it is, the API comment is corrected, and ExpiredFileStaffAccessTest pins all three cases.
Verified before merging: 3 passed on the trial-merge. The counter-check has to be inverted for a characterisation test -- these pass on unmodified main by construction, so the question is whether they fail when the boundary moves. Deleting the closing notExpired() from scopeVisibleToClient gives 1 failed / 2 passed, and it is the third case, the one carrying the decision, that falls. File.php overlaps #1726 and Api/FilesController.php overlaps #1727, both already merged, and both are intact in the merged tree. scramble:export reproduces the spec unchanged.
Reported and fixed by @denkfabrik-li.
File::isExpired() documents the rule the application is supposed to
follow: once past, the file is hidden from clients and the public site
"but staff keep full access to view, download, and manage it".
The second half is not true of a client-scoped staff member.
StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles() builds their library as their own uploads
union what each assigned client may see, and that second half runs
through File::scopeVisibleToClient, which ends in notExpired() -- a
client-side rule. Measured on main, with a rep holding one client and a
file the administrator uploaded and shared with that client:
before expiry in_library true GET .../download -> 200
after expiry in_library false GET .../download -> 403
the rep's own expired upload in_library true
an unscoped administrator, same expired file in_library true
Api\FilesController says it the same way -- "Only the client branch of
the visibility rules drops them" -- which reads as though a staff caller
is unaffected, when a client-scoped one is reached through that very
branch.
This does not change that behaviour. c8078f65 weighed exactly this and
decided against it: widening it would mean a library query that keeps
expired rows, and scopeVisibleToClient is the single source of truth for
client file access, the highest-stakes function to go changing for a
dashboard widget. The widget was relabelled instead.
That decision lives in a commit message and in one widget's label.
Nothing in the code said it, and the docblock nearest the rule went on
promising the opposite -- which is how the next person re-derives "staff
keep full access" and widens something.
So both comments now state the boundary and why it is where it is, and
ExpiredFileStaffAccessTest makes it executable: an unscoped staff member
keeps an expired file, a client-scoped one keeps their own expired
upload, a client-scoped one loses a client's file when it expires.
Not changed: scopeVisibleToClient, StaffLibraryScope, and the
expired-files widget. If the boundary should move, that is a separate
conversation and a separate change.
Counter-check inverted, since these pass on unmodified main by
construction -- there is no behaviour fix for them to prove. What they
have to do is fail if the boundary moves, so the mutation is the widening
itself. Deleting the closing notExpired() call from scopeVisibleToClient
turns the file red, 1 failed / 2 passed, and it is the third case, the
one carrying the decision, that falls.
Suite 2108 passed / 2 skipped, 11416 assertions, PHPStan level 8 clean.
Measured on base 06c364d2, where main itself is 2105 / 2.
FilesController::expiryInstant exists because a calendar day ends where
the person naming it lives: the web form posts a bare YYYY-MM-DD, and
storing that as it arrives would cut a file off at midnight UTC -- "expires
on the 12th" ending partway through the 11th for anyone in the Americas.
The API takes the same field, validates it as a date, and stores it raw:
web → 2026-09-12T23:59:59+00:00 (end of the day, as the docblock means)
API → 2026-09-12T00:00:00+00:00 (raw)
Same value, same field, same file, two meanings -- and the earlier of the
two is a file that dies at the start of the day it was promised.
A bare date now means the end of that day in the caller's timezone, as it
does on the web. A value carrying a time is unchanged: it is an instant
the caller named on purpose, the API can express one and a date input
cannot. The endpoint's docblock says both, so the OpenAPI document does
too.
Three tests: the day, the timestamp, and clearing. Without the fix the
first goes red.
Folder uses SoftDeletes. The `exists` rule runs against the table, so a
folder in the trash passes it -- while every resolution that follows goes
through Folder::query(), which honours the soft delete and finds nothing.
Ten rules across five controllers rely on that check, and each one reads
it as "this folder exists".
Two of them then wrote the id anyway. Api\FilesController::store()
resolves the folder, hands the null to Folder::uploadableBy(), is told
yes -- correctly, that is the rule for a root upload -- and passes
$validated['folder_id'] to the write. FilesController::store() is the
same shape once #1694 gives it the guard. FilesController::update() and
its API twin write it straight through with nothing in between.
The result is a live file inside a deleted folder, which is a state
nothing else in the application produces: FolderService::delete() deletes
every file in the subtree along with it. The row is reachable by id, in
search and over the API, and missing from the listing its uploader would
look in.
Rules::folderId() makes the check mean what its readers assume, once,
where the reasoning can be written down -- the same argument slug() makes
for itself one method above. Every site takes it, so the file cannot end
up with two spellings of the same rule and no way to tell which is the
safe one.
What changes, path by path:
- POST /files, POST /api/v1/files, PATCH /files/{file} and
PATCH /api/v1/files/{file} refuse a folder in the trash instead of
writing its id. This is the fix.
- POST /uploads used to accept it and quietly file the upload at the
root -- its guard and its write already agreed, on null. It now says
so instead, which is what the other upload paths do.
- files/{file}/move, files/bulk-edit, folders, folders/{folder}/move
and the portal's my-folders already refused, through
StaffLibraryScope::folders() or Folder::scopeVisibleToClient(), both
of which drop trashed rows. They still refuse; the answer is now 422
naming folder_id rather than a bare 404. Those two guards are asking
a different question -- "is this folder yours" -- and they keep
asking it.
No live folder id behaves differently anywhere, and the root (a null
folder_id) is untouched.
The published API document is unchanged: `exists` renders the same either
way. Regenerated with php artisan scramble:export and byte-identical.
Setting folder_id through update() is the same privileged reparent as
move() and bulkUpdate(), but only those two verified the target folder
was inside the caller's library (StaffLibraryScope::folders). update()
validated it only for existence, so a client-scoped staff member could
reparent an in-scope file into a folder shared with a client they are
not assigned to -- which File::scopeVisibleToClient then exposes to that
client, sidestepping the boundary the sharing endpoints enforce
(guardAssignable), and likewise into a public folder without
upload_public.
Apply the same scope->folders()->findOrFail() guard on both the web and
API update(), but only when folder_id actually changes, so re-saving a
file that already sits in an out-of-scope folder (reachable via a direct
client share) still works.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
ignacionelson