Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
denkfabrik-li 5e60d2ef88 Say what expiry does to a client-scoped staff member's library
File::isExpired() documents the rule the application is supposed to
follow: once past, the file is hidden from clients and the public site
"but staff keep full access to view, download, and manage it".

The second half is not true of a client-scoped staff member.
StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles() builds their library as their own uploads
union what each assigned client may see, and that second half runs
through File::scopeVisibleToClient, which ends in notExpired() -- a
client-side rule. Measured on main, with a rep holding one client and a
file the administrator uploaded and shared with that client:

    before expiry   in_library true    GET .../download -> 200
    after expiry    in_library false   GET .../download -> 403

    the rep's own expired upload                  in_library true
    an unscoped administrator, same expired file  in_library true

Api\FilesController says it the same way -- "Only the client branch of
the visibility rules drops them" -- which reads as though a staff caller
is unaffected, when a client-scoped one is reached through that very
branch.

This does not change that behaviour. c8078f65 weighed exactly this and
decided against it: widening it would mean a library query that keeps
expired rows, and scopeVisibleToClient is the single source of truth for
client file access, the highest-stakes function to go changing for a
dashboard widget. The widget was relabelled instead.

That decision lives in a commit message and in one widget's label.
Nothing in the code said it, and the docblock nearest the rule went on
promising the opposite -- which is how the next person re-derives "staff
keep full access" and widens something.

So both comments now state the boundary and why it is where it is, and
ExpiredFileStaffAccessTest makes it executable: an unscoped staff member
keeps an expired file, a client-scoped one keeps their own expired
upload, a client-scoped one loses a client's file when it expires.

Not changed: scopeVisibleToClient, StaffLibraryScope, and the
expired-files widget. If the boundary should move, that is a separate
conversation and a separate change.

Counter-check inverted, since these pass on unmodified main by
construction -- there is no behaviour fix for them to prove. What they
have to do is fail if the boundary moves, so the mutation is the widening
itself. Deleting the closing notExpired() call from scopeVisibleToClient
turns the file red, 1 failed / 2 passed, and it is the third case, the
one carrying the decision, that falls.

Suite 2108 passed / 2 skipped, 11416 assertions, PHPStan level 8 clean.
Measured on base 06c364d2, where main itself is 2105 / 2.
2026-08-28 06:56:09 +02:00
Ignacio Nelson e815ac8be5 Merge pull request #1681 from denkfabrik-li/fix/file-update-folder-scope
Scope a file's destination folder on update(), as move() already does
2026-08-26 22:21:52 -03:00
denkfabrik-li 7727ad7616 Say what exists:folders,id was already being read as
Folder uses SoftDeletes. The `exists` rule runs against the table, so a
folder in the trash passes it -- while every resolution that follows goes
through Folder::query(), which honours the soft delete and finds nothing.
Ten rules across five controllers rely on that check, and each one reads
it as "this folder exists".

Two of them then wrote the id anyway. Api\FilesController::store()
resolves the folder, hands the null to Folder::uploadableBy(), is told
yes -- correctly, that is the rule for a root upload -- and passes
$validated['folder_id'] to the write. FilesController::store() is the
same shape once #1694 gives it the guard. FilesController::update() and
its API twin write it straight through with nothing in between.

The result is a live file inside a deleted folder, which is a state
nothing else in the application produces: FolderService::delete() deletes
every file in the subtree along with it. The row is reachable by id, in
search and over the API, and missing from the listing its uploader would
look in.

Rules::folderId() makes the check mean what its readers assume, once,
where the reasoning can be written down -- the same argument slug() makes
for itself one method above. Every site takes it, so the file cannot end
up with two spellings of the same rule and no way to tell which is the
safe one.

What changes, path by path:

  - POST /files, POST /api/v1/files, PATCH /files/{file} and
    PATCH /api/v1/files/{file} refuse a folder in the trash instead of
    writing its id. This is the fix.
  - POST /uploads used to accept it and quietly file the upload at the
    root -- its guard and its write already agreed, on null. It now says
    so instead, which is what the other upload paths do.
  - files/{file}/move, files/bulk-edit, folders, folders/{folder}/move
    and the portal's my-folders already refused, through
    StaffLibraryScope::folders() or Folder::scopeVisibleToClient(), both
    of which drop trashed rows. They still refuse; the answer is now 422
    naming folder_id rather than a bare 404. Those two guards are asking
    a different question -- "is this folder yours" -- and they keep
    asking it.

No live folder id behaves differently anywhere, and the root (a null
folder_id) is untouched.

The published API document is unchanged: `exists` renders the same either
way. Regenerated with php artisan scramble:export and byte-identical.
2026-08-26 06:01:06 +02:00
denkfabrik-li 21fdf98981 Scope a file's destination folder on update(), as move() already does
Setting folder_id through update() is the same privileged reparent as
move() and bulkUpdate(), but only those two verified the target folder
was inside the caller's library (StaffLibraryScope::folders). update()
validated it only for existence, so a client-scoped staff member could
reparent an in-scope file into a folder shared with a client they are
not assigned to -- which File::scopeVisibleToClient then exposes to that
client, sidestepping the boundary the sharing endpoints enforce
(guardAssignable), and likewise into a public folder without
upload_public.

Apply the same scope->folders()->findOrFail() guard on both the web and
API update(), but only when folder_id actually changes, so re-saving a
file that already sits in an out-of-scope folder (reachable via a direct
client share) still works.
2026-08-25 20:35:18 +02:00
ignacionelson 6e47d76ba6 ProjectSend 2.0.0
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.

This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.

Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
2026-08-14 01:38:12 -03:00