Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ignacionelson 7da4635f13 Say which clients a scoped staff member may be told about
A staff member limited to their own assigned clients could read the names
and ids of clients on nobody's roster but their own, out of ordinary file
metadata.

The file boundary was never wrong. Sharing means a file can legitimately
reach a scoped viewer through client A while client B uploaded it, or
while B also receives it -- StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles is right to
permit that, and a B-only file is still a 403. What was wrong is that
every response then went on to name B. FileResource serialised the loaded
uploader and each assignment unfiltered; ShareTargets::assigned took no
viewer at all, so the details panel published the recipient list as it
stands and forSubject narrowed available_clients while handing
assigned_clients straight through. FoldersController::fileRow,
FilesController::edit, FileDetailsController and ClientFilesController
each named the uploader the same way. The API's uploaded_by filter asked
the question without any name attached: it answered "does this client of
yours put files in front of a client of mine" for any id a caller cared
to try.

12a8ebe3 said the rule out loud while fixing topClientsByStorage -- "the
file was theirs to read and the uploader's name was not theirs to see" --
and then the rule stayed in that widget. So it is a class now.
ClientIdentityScope is the one decision, asked by every surface that
names a client, and it deliberately answers about clients only: a
colleague's name is not a client identity, and hiding it would hide who
uploaded most of the library from the people who work in it. Groups go
through it too, on the same argument -- a group is a list of clients
wearing one name -- which the report did not cover but is the same leak.

Two judgement calls worth naming. assigned() keeps returning the whole
truth and gains a warning, because VisibleCommentScope resolves
notification recipients from it and a recipient filtered out of that list
is one who never hears about a message addressed to them; assignedFor()
is the display half. And FileResource asks at serialisation rather than
in its callers' eager loads, which is the opposite of how the version
counterparts next door are narrowed: that one is set-shaped and folds
into a query, this one is a per-row roster check across eight call sites
in four controllers, two of them re-loading assignments after a write.

The tests assert on whole response bodies rather than on named keys. The
leak was never in one field -- the same name arrived through the
uploader, through the recipient list and through four screens -- so a
body that does not contain the name anywhere is the only assertion that
would have caught all of it. Ten of the eighteen fail without this
change; the rest are the negative controls, including that an unscoped
administrator still sees every name and that the uploaded_by filter still
works for a client on the roster and for staff.

Reported by @Noorkhalel, GHSA-whmp-p9hv-r7j7. Their write-up named every
affected surface and the root cause in each, which is most of why this
took one pass.
2026-09-03 00:56:41 -03:00
ignacionelson 51eea30dda Answer "did they ever actually get it?" from the file itself
The two things staff most often want to know about a file — who
downloaded it, who looked at it — were answerable only by reading the
whole activity log past everything else that had happened to it, or by
going back to the library list for the details panel.

The file's own page now has a Downloads & previews tab: the twenty most
recent times it was taken or looked at, each with who did it and the
address it went to, over a running count of both. Below them, two
buttons open the file's full history already filtered — one to every
download, one to every preview — so the narrow question is one click
and the whole log is still one click further.

Which filter value stands for "every download" is decided server-side
and travels with the payload, because it is a fact about the log's
vocabulary: downloads are three actions and share a group, previews are
one action and are filtered by name. The history page now also keeps
whatever filter it was sent with visible in its dropdown even at a
count of zero, so a button cannot land somebody on an empty table above
a select that has gone blank.
2026-08-21 15:04:11 -03:00
ignacionelson cca3d9c314 Group only the downloads, which are the actions that need it
The grouped filter had a second member, "All previews", built on a
public-preview action that does not exist: previewing is recorded one
way today, so its own option already answers "who previewed this?" in
full. Static analysis caught the reference; the group would have been
unreachable even if it had compiled, since a group with a single
present member is deliberately not offered.

Previews get a group here the day a second way to preview a file is
recorded separately, and the test now pins the single-member case on a
file whose log holds one flavour of download.
2026-08-21 13:12:26 -03:00
ignacionelson 6b76c11192 Answer "what happened to this file?" on the file's own page
A file's history was only reachable from the library list, through the
details panel's Activity tab — so anyone who arrived at the file from a
link, a search or a notification had to go back and find the row they
came from to ask what had happened to it.

The file's own page now carries an Activity tab of its own, next to
General and Sharing: the twenty most recent entries, fetched only if the
tab is opened, and a link to the full history. It is behind the same
view_actions_log permission as everywhere else.

That full history is now filterable, which is the point of sending
somebody to it. The action list is built from the file's own log rather
than from the eighty-odd actions the software can record — all but a
handful of which can never apply to a file — and each option carries its
count. Downloads are three separate actions on purpose (a signed-in
recipient, a public link, the public group listing), so "All downloads"
asks that question once instead of three times; the group only appears
when the file's log actually holds more than one of its members.
Narrowing by who acted and by date range works the same as it does on
the main activity log, the reader's own calendar day included.
2026-08-21 12:39:16 -03:00
ignacionelson 6e47d76ba6 ProjectSend 2.0.0
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.

This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.

Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
2026-08-14 01:38:12 -03:00