The confirm-password screen hid its field from every account that was
not Local, and told it to set a password instead. That is right for an
account a provider created, which has no password anybody has seen. It
is wrong for a directory account: its password is the directory's,
PasswordVerification accepts it, and /settings/password refuses to let
it set another. So an LDAP account could not get past the confirmation
at all, and everything behind it, turning on two-factor included, was
out of reach. The new dialog copied the same question.
Both now ask whether the account came from a provider, and the prop is
called has_password, which is what it means. The dialog also clears
the typed password when it closes or once it has been used, instead of
keeping it in component state.
password.confirm redirected every write to the confirm-password screen.
A redirect cannot carry a POST body, and Redirector::guest() only
remembers the exact URL of a GET, so after confirming, the user landed
back on an empty form and the action never ran. On the API token forms
that meant typing the name, the scopes and the expiry again.
An Inertia request now gets a 423 marked X-Password-Confirmation. A
dialog mounted around every page catches it, asks for the password over
the current page, and sends the refused request again with the same data
and callbacks, so the form finishes as if nothing happened. The check
itself is still the framework's. Plain form posts and JSON clients are
answered as before, and accounts with no local password are offered a
way to set one, as the confirm screen does.
Reported by Ricardo Cazati, who had to turn compulsory two-factor off to
get his colleagues working.
An account provisioned by a provider carries a generated password nobody
has ever seen. The password screen asked for the current one before it
would set a new one, so those accounts could never have a password of
their own — and enrolling in two-factor is behind a password
confirmation, so they could not enrol either. With
`TwoFactorEnforcement` set, the enforcement middleware sent them to
enrol, enrolling sent them to confirm a password they do not have, and
every other screen — including the one that would have given them one —
redirected back. No way in and no way out.
- The password screen asks for the current one only where there is one,
and says "Set a password" otherwise. Setting it moves the account to
`local`, the line NewPasswordController already writes when such an
account resets its password: the hash is now what signs it in, and the
settings screens read that off this column.
- An LDAP account is refused outright rather than handed a password that
signs nothing in — its password lives in the directory.
- The enforcement middleware lets the password screen through, the way it
already lets the confirm-password screen through, so the loop has an
exit.
- The confirm-password screen offers to set one instead of asking for a
password that does not exist.
ConfirmablePasswordController checked the local hash and nothing else:
Auth::guard('web')->validate(['email' => ..., 'password' => ...])
An account provisioned from a directory has no local password. It holds a
Str::password(64) generated at provisioning time that nobody has ever
seen, and the application knows this -- LdapAuthenticator::isDirectoryAccount()
is the question, and the sign-in form asks it before deciding what to
check. This screen did not, so it refused those accounts the only password
they have.
That is not a cosmetic refusal. `password.confirm` stands in front of
enrolling in two-factor, so a directory-provisioned client could not enrol
at all. Set TwoFactorEnforcement to `clients` or `all` and EnforceTwoFactor
redirects every request they make to two-factor.show -- a screen whose
"enable" button leads to a door they cannot open. PR #1708 fixed the
routing half of that ("Let an enforced user reach the far side of the
confirm-password screen"); this is the credential half.
The rule now lives in one place. PasswordVerification is the sibling of
SignIn on the other side of the line SignIn draws -- SignIn is everything
after a credential checks out, this is the one question asked before it --
and it exists for the reason SignIn gives for existing: "the way they get
broken is by being written twice". LoginRequest keeps its ordering, its
provisioning and its rate limiting, and delegates the check itself.
Behaviour preserved exactly on the sign-in path: local hash first so an
account that answers locally generates no directory traffic, directory
only for accounts whose credentials live there, the stale-hash re-hash on
the local branch only, and the ldap_dn stamp on the directory branch. All
23 existing LDAP sign-in tests pass unchanged.
One thing this closes on the way past. Because the old check went straight
to the local hash, a directory account's placeholder *would* have confirmed
if anybody ever learned it -- a door the sign-in form does not have, since
it skips the local branch for those accounts. It now behaves the same on
both screens; there is a test.
**What this does not fix, and should be read as a limitation.** Accounts
provisioned by a social provider are in the same position -- a random local
password nobody holds -- and they are not directory accounts, so this
changes nothing for them. Their route to a local password is the password
reset, which #1748 made work end to end by moving auth_source to Local when
the reset completes. A social account that has never done that still cannot
confirm a password, and so still cannot enrol in two-factor.
Tests: three fail against the unfixed pair, including the placeholder case
above. Two more pin what must not change -- a wrong directory password is
still refused, and a local account with LDAP switched on still confirms
against its own hash.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
ignacionelson