The condition was on the step. A skipped step has still had a machine
allocated for it, and Actions bills per job that runs — so `issue_comment`
firing on every comment in the repository meant every "merged, thank you"
on a pull request, and every comment on an ordinary issue, started a
runner to decide it had nothing to do.
Of the last forty runs, twelve were exactly that. Yesterday's twenty
merges each drew a comment, and each comment drew a runner.
Moved up to the job, where a false condition means no runner at all, and
narrowed with `issue.pull_request` so comments on plain issues stop
qualifying too. GitHub cannot filter `issue_comment` by body at the `on:`
level, so the job is the only place this decision can be made — which is
worth the comment beside it, because the obvious tidy-up is to push it
back down to the step it guards.
Behaviour is unchanged: the same two comment bodies still trigger a
check, and every pull_request_target still does.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
ignacionelson