Api\UsersController::update() compares the validated value strictly:
if ($user->is($actor) && ($validated['active'] ?? true) === false) {
The `boolean` rule accepts 0 and "0" as well as false, and it does not
cast. `0 === false` is false, so the refusal never fires -- and the
model's own `boolean` cast then stores as false exactly the value the
guard had just decided was not a deactivation.
Measured against main, with a second administrator present so that
guardLastAdministrator is not what answers:
{"active": false} -> 422, still active
{"active": 0} -> 200, active is now false
{"active": "0"} -> 200, active is now false
The method's own docblock says it is "Refused with a 422 if the change
would leave the installation with no active administrator, or if you
would be deactivating yourself", and the web screen does refuse. This is
the API half of that sentence.
RolesController::guardScopeRemoval documents the rule this breaks, in the
same words: callers resolve the flag with Request::boolean() and hand the
same value to the guard and to the write, deliberately, because reading
the validated array and comparing it strictly "would let a request
through here that the model's `boolean` cast then stores as false anyway
-- the guard and the write disagreeing about one value is exactly the
shape this guard exists to prevent".
So read it once, with Request::boolean(), and give that one value to both.
Not changed: the validation rule. It stays `boolean`, so the accepted
inputs are the same as before -- what changes is that one of them stops
meaning two different things on its way through. Nor anything about
deactivating somebody else: all three forms still work, and there are
tests saying so.
Six cases from two datasets. Two measured red against the unfixed
controller (2 failed / 4 passed): 0 and "0" on yourself. `false` was
already refused, and the three "somebody else" cases are green either way
-- they guard against the fix over-refusing, not against the bug.
Full suite passes (2054 passed / 2 skipped), PHPStan level 8 clean.
A managed installation's staff accounts were expected to arrive from
outside it, so users.manage was Community-only and /users, /roles and
their API twins answered 404 there. The platform side spent a long
document designing its way around that gate; opening it is cheaper than
routing around it, and more honest about where the knowledge sits.
The division that settles it is the one managed storage already uses. We
do not manage a tenant's files from outside — a bucket is provisioned, a
scoped credential handed over, and what goes in it is the tenant's
business. Seats are the same kind of thing. A platform knows how many
staff accounts it sold; it does not know whether Alice should be an
Account Manager, and it certainly does not know where her files go when
she leaves. Capacity is the platform's, occupancy is the tenant's, and
the cap belongs in an environment variable rather than in a closed
screen.
The capability stays in front of the routes rather than being deleted.
It is currently true in both editions, but it is the seam an edition
difference has to travel through, and removing it would mean inventing
one again later.
Seven test files asserted the old rule, which is the tests doing their
job. Most flip. Two needed a different example instead: EnsureCapability
and AbilityCapability were both using users.manage to stand for
"Community-only", so they now use storage.configure and manage_updates —
keys that still are.
Two rationales half-expired and say so rather than being quietly
rewritten. CommentAuthors gave two reasons for being a setting rather
than a permission; the first was that roles are uneditable on cloud,
which stopped being true here, and the second — that `Everyone` includes
anonymous visitors, who have no role to hold a key — was always the
stronger and is now the whole of it.
The seat cap this makes necessary is the next commit, not this one. On
its own this change lets a managed tenant create staff accounts without
limit, which is why the two belong in the same release.
Deleting a staff or client account is two writes: soft-delete the account,
then cascade or reassign the files and folders it owns. All four destroy()
paths (Users + Clients, web + API) ran them one after the other with nothing
tying them together.
If the second write throws, the account is already gone but its content is
not handled. The concrete way in is the reassign branch: validate() checks
reassign_to_id with exists(active), but apply() re-resolves it with
findOrFail() a moment later (AccountContentDeletion:108), so a target
deactivated or deleted in between throws — leaving a soft-deleted account
whose files still point at it, and a UserDeleted log for a deletion that did
not finish.
Wrap the delete()+apply() pair in a single DB::transaction() in each of the
four destroy() methods. validate() and the authorization guards stay outside
it: they are read-only and must be able to reject before anything is written.
cascadeDelete()/reassignTo() already open their own transaction, which nests
as a savepoint under this one, so the account soft-delete, its activity log,
and the content work now commit or roll back together.
Tests: a DeletedAccountContent double that reports content to handle and then
throws while handling it (tests/Helpers.php) drives one test per destroy()
endpoint asserting the account survives the failure and no UserDeleted entry
is written; each goes red against the un-wrapped controller.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
denkfabrik-li