A staff member limited to their own assigned clients could read the names
and ids of clients on nobody's roster but their own, out of ordinary file
metadata.
The file boundary was never wrong. Sharing means a file can legitimately
reach a scoped viewer through client A while client B uploaded it, or
while B also receives it -- StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles is right to
permit that, and a B-only file is still a 403. What was wrong is that
every response then went on to name B. FileResource serialised the loaded
uploader and each assignment unfiltered; ShareTargets::assigned took no
viewer at all, so the details panel published the recipient list as it
stands and forSubject narrowed available_clients while handing
assigned_clients straight through. FoldersController::fileRow,
FilesController::edit, FileDetailsController and ClientFilesController
each named the uploader the same way. The API's uploaded_by filter asked
the question without any name attached: it answered "does this client of
yours put files in front of a client of mine" for any id a caller cared
to try.
12a8ebe3 said the rule out loud while fixing topClientsByStorage -- "the
file was theirs to read and the uploader's name was not theirs to see" --
and then the rule stayed in that widget. So it is a class now.
ClientIdentityScope is the one decision, asked by every surface that
names a client, and it deliberately answers about clients only: a
colleague's name is not a client identity, and hiding it would hide who
uploaded most of the library from the people who work in it. Groups go
through it too, on the same argument -- a group is a list of clients
wearing one name -- which the report did not cover but is the same leak.
Two judgement calls worth naming. assigned() keeps returning the whole
truth and gains a warning, because VisibleCommentScope resolves
notification recipients from it and a recipient filtered out of that list
is one who never hears about a message addressed to them; assignedFor()
is the display half. And FileResource asks at serialisation rather than
in its callers' eager loads, which is the opposite of how the version
counterparts next door are narrowed: that one is set-shaped and folds
into a query, this one is a per-row roster check across eight call sites
in four controllers, two of them re-loading assignments after a write.
The tests assert on whole response bodies rather than on named keys. The
leak was never in one field -- the same name arrived through the
uploader, through the recipient list and through four screens -- so a
body that does not contain the name anywhere is the only assertion that
would have caught all of it. Ten of the eighteen fail without this
change; the rest are the negative controls, including that an unscoped
administrator still sees every name and that the uploaded_by filter still
works for a client on the roster and for staff.
Reported by @Noorkhalel, GHSA-whmp-p9hv-r7j7. Their write-up named every
affected surface and the root cause in each, which is most of why this
took one pass.
File::isExpired() documented the rule the whole application is supposed to follow: once past, the file is hidden from clients and the public site but staff keep full access. The second half is not true of a client-scoped staff member. StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles() builds their library as own uploads plus what each assigned client may see, and that second half runs through File::scopeVisibleToClient, which ends in notExpired() -- a client-side rule. So an expired file they held only through a client leaves their library and answers 403 on download, while their own expired upload stays and an unscoped administrator is unaffected. Api\FilesController stated it the same way, "Only the client branch of the visibility rules drops them", which reads as though a staff caller is unaffected when a client-scoped one is reached through that very branch.
This does not change that behaviour. c8078f65 weighed widening it and decided against, because scopeVisibleToClient is the single source of truth for client file access and the highest-stakes function to go changing for a dashboard widget, and relabelled the widget instead. That decision lived in a commit message and one widget's label; nothing in the code said it, and the docblock nearest the rule went on promising the opposite -- which is how the next person re-derives "staff keep full access" and widens the scope to match.
Documentation and characterisation only. isExpired() now states the boundary and why it is where it is, the API comment is corrected, and ExpiredFileStaffAccessTest pins all three cases.
Verified before merging: 3 passed on the trial-merge. The counter-check has to be inverted for a characterisation test -- these pass on unmodified main by construction, so the question is whether they fail when the boundary moves. Deleting the closing notExpired() from scopeVisibleToClient gives 1 failed / 2 passed, and it is the third case, the one carrying the decision, that falls. File.php overlaps #1726 and Api/FilesController.php overlaps #1727, both already merged, and both are intact in the merged tree. scramble:export reproduces the spec unchanged.
Reported and fixed by @denkfabrik-li.
File::isExpired() documents the rule the application is supposed to
follow: once past, the file is hidden from clients and the public site
"but staff keep full access to view, download, and manage it".
The second half is not true of a client-scoped staff member.
StaffLibraryScope::buildFiles() builds their library as their own uploads
union what each assigned client may see, and that second half runs
through File::scopeVisibleToClient, which ends in notExpired() -- a
client-side rule. Measured on main, with a rep holding one client and a
file the administrator uploaded and shared with that client:
before expiry in_library true GET .../download -> 200
after expiry in_library false GET .../download -> 403
the rep's own expired upload in_library true
an unscoped administrator, same expired file in_library true
Api\FilesController says it the same way -- "Only the client branch of
the visibility rules drops them" -- which reads as though a staff caller
is unaffected, when a client-scoped one is reached through that very
branch.
This does not change that behaviour. c8078f65 weighed exactly this and
decided against it: widening it would mean a library query that keeps
expired rows, and scopeVisibleToClient is the single source of truth for
client file access, the highest-stakes function to go changing for a
dashboard widget. The widget was relabelled instead.
That decision lives in a commit message and in one widget's label.
Nothing in the code said it, and the docblock nearest the rule went on
promising the opposite -- which is how the next person re-derives "staff
keep full access" and widens something.
So both comments now state the boundary and why it is where it is, and
ExpiredFileStaffAccessTest makes it executable: an unscoped staff member
keeps an expired file, a client-scoped one keeps their own expired
upload, a client-scoped one loses a client's file when it expires.
Not changed: scopeVisibleToClient, StaffLibraryScope, and the
expired-files widget. If the boundary should move, that is a separate
conversation and a separate change.
Counter-check inverted, since these pass on unmodified main by
construction -- there is no behaviour fix for them to prove. What they
have to do is fail if the boundary moves, so the mutation is the widening
itself. Deleting the closing notExpired() call from scopeVisibleToClient
turns the file red, 1 failed / 2 passed, and it is the third case, the
one carrying the decision, that falls.
Suite 2108 passed / 2 skipped, 11416 assertions, PHPStan level 8 clean.
Measured on base 06c364d2, where main itself is 2105 / 2.
FilesController::expiryInstant exists because a calendar day ends where
the person naming it lives: the web form posts a bare YYYY-MM-DD, and
storing that as it arrives would cut a file off at midnight UTC -- "expires
on the 12th" ending partway through the 11th for anyone in the Americas.
The API takes the same field, validates it as a date, and stores it raw:
web → 2026-09-12T23:59:59+00:00 (end of the day, as the docblock means)
API → 2026-09-12T00:00:00+00:00 (raw)
Same value, same field, same file, two meanings -- and the earlier of the
two is a file that dies at the start of the day it was promised.
A bare date now means the end of that day in the caller's timezone, as it
does on the web. A value carrying a time is unchanged: it is an instant
the caller named on purpose, the API can express one and a date input
cannot. The endpoint's docblock says both, so the OpenAPI document does
too.
Three tests: the day, the timestamp, and clearing. Without the fix the
first goes red.
Folder uses SoftDeletes. The `exists` rule runs against the table, so a
folder in the trash passes it -- while every resolution that follows goes
through Folder::query(), which honours the soft delete and finds nothing.
Ten rules across five controllers rely on that check, and each one reads
it as "this folder exists".
Two of them then wrote the id anyway. Api\FilesController::store()
resolves the folder, hands the null to Folder::uploadableBy(), is told
yes -- correctly, that is the rule for a root upload -- and passes
$validated['folder_id'] to the write. FilesController::store() is the
same shape once #1694 gives it the guard. FilesController::update() and
its API twin write it straight through with nothing in between.
The result is a live file inside a deleted folder, which is a state
nothing else in the application produces: FolderService::delete() deletes
every file in the subtree along with it. The row is reachable by id, in
search and over the API, and missing from the listing its uploader would
look in.
Rules::folderId() makes the check mean what its readers assume, once,
where the reasoning can be written down -- the same argument slug() makes
for itself one method above. Every site takes it, so the file cannot end
up with two spellings of the same rule and no way to tell which is the
safe one.
What changes, path by path:
- POST /files, POST /api/v1/files, PATCH /files/{file} and
PATCH /api/v1/files/{file} refuse a folder in the trash instead of
writing its id. This is the fix.
- POST /uploads used to accept it and quietly file the upload at the
root -- its guard and its write already agreed, on null. It now says
so instead, which is what the other upload paths do.
- files/{file}/move, files/bulk-edit, folders, folders/{folder}/move
and the portal's my-folders already refused, through
StaffLibraryScope::folders() or Folder::scopeVisibleToClient(), both
of which drop trashed rows. They still refuse; the answer is now 422
naming folder_id rather than a bare 404. Those two guards are asking
a different question -- "is this folder yours" -- and they keep
asking it.
No live folder id behaves differently anywhere, and the root (a null
folder_id) is untouched.
The published API document is unchanged: `exists` renders the same either
way. Regenerated with php artisan scramble:export and byte-identical.
Setting folder_id through update() is the same privileged reparent as
move() and bulkUpdate(), but only those two verified the target folder
was inside the caller's library (StaffLibraryScope::folders). update()
validated it only for existence, so a client-scoped staff member could
reparent an in-scope file into a folder shared with a client they are
not assigned to -- which File::scopeVisibleToClient then exposes to that
client, sidestepping the boundary the sharing endpoints enforce
(guardAssignable), and likewise into a public folder without
upload_public.
Apply the same scope->folders()->findOrFail() guard on both the web and
API update(), but only when folder_id actually changes, so re-saving a
file that already sits in an out-of-scope folder (reachable via a direct
client share) still works.
Client file sharing, rebuilt from the ground up: a private area per
client, resumable uploads, folders, groups and categories, sharing with
expiry dates and download limits, comments, file versions, an activity
log, a REST API, and sixteen languages.
This repository begins here. ProjectSend 2 was developed privately, and
that development history is not published — the previous generation
remains available, with its own history, at projectsend/legacy.
Free software under the GNU General Public License v2, or (at your
option) any later version.
ignacionelson