mirror of
https://github.com/PerpetualSoftware/pad.git
synced 2026-09-10 15:05:40 +00:00
xarmian
a790810bd6
The angle no earlier round probed: which artifacts a human or agent CONSUMES should have changed and did not. Five, and the pattern is the one my own record keeps naming — the caveat existed in the artifacts I was editing and not in the ones that get read. - .env.example had neither new variable and still described PAD_SSE_MAX_CONNECTIONS with its old single-endpoint meaning. It is the file an operator copies; docs/deployment.md being right does not help someone who never opens it. - docs/deployment.md called the readiness endpoint /health/ready. The route is /api/v1/health/ready, so every instruction to go read the new redis block pointed at a 404. Corrected there and in four code comments, and the Health Check section now actually shows the three endpoints, the healthy payload, and the degraded one — it previously demonstrated only /api/v1/health, which is the build-info endpoint and says nothing about readiness. - CLAUDE.md listed /api/v1/events and not /api/v1/events/stream at all, so the endpoint this unit bounds was undocumented in the file agents read first. Added, with the limits and the 429 contract. - `pad watch --stream --help` said silence means "no workspace linked or padd unreachable". A capacity refusal now produces the same silence through the same backoff, so the help was enumerating a set that had quietly grown. - The plugin skill told agents "silence means nothing changed" — now false in the same way, and worse, because an agent repeats it to a user as though the quiet were evidence. Rewritten to say what silence does and does not prove. The plugin monitor description had the same enumeration and got the same fix. Checked rather than assumed: there are two SKILL.md files, and only the plugin copy carries a notifications section — the embedded one has no monitor guidance to correct. NOT changed, and raised with the lead instead: deploy/k8s/deployment.yaml points both probes at /api/v1/health, so the readiness endpoint is never consumed. Fixing it is right but it changes rollout behaviour for anyone using the shipped manifest (a database blip would start pulling pods from the load balancer), which is a deployment-posture call rather than part of this unit. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JVDBKbgn3Xt7ndW1YoYd8X