mirror of
https://github.com/PerpetualSoftware/pad.git
synced 2026-09-10 15:05:40 +00:00
94cc2492fc
Codex round 2, on the rollout angle. Four findings; one was a real silent-loss hole and three were claims in the docs and config comment that the code does not support. THE HOLE. Phase 2 mints an epoch and the counter climbs; the deployment rolls back to phase 1; the seq key is then evicted or deleted; phase-1 publishers climb from 1 again; phase 2 is re-enabled and its SET NX finds the OLD epoch still there. A receiver that had adopted it sees no change, and if its high-water mark is below the new sequence -- a replica that just started, or one whose buffers were empty -- the numeric check does not see the reset either. Two ID spaces merge in one buffer silently, which is the outcome this whole unit exists to prevent. Phase 2's rotation cannot cover it: that rotation fires when the SCRIPT's own INCR returns 1, and by then the counter has climbed past 1 under the phase-1 path. So phase 1 now deletes the epoch when its own INCR returns 1. Deleting rather than rotating, because that path publishes no epoch and has none to propose, and an absent key is what phase 2's SET NX expects. The cost is one extra buffer drop if a phase-1 publisher deletes an epoch a flipped publisher just minted during the phase-2 roll -- loud and bounded, which is the direction this family always chooses over a silent merge. THE THREE CLAIMS. - "Rolling back is symmetric: unset the variable and roll" was true only of the roll back to PHASE 1. Downgrading past it is a second step in reverse order, because a pre-phase-1 binary still cannot parse the prefix, and introducing one while any flipped instance publishes drops events on it. - Unsetting the environment variable is not the same as setting the value false: events_publish_epoch can come from config.toml, whose value stands when the variable is absent. - counter_backward was documented as expected during mixed-version rolls and near zero between them. On phase 1 it can be non-zero at any time: that path keeps the two-call INCR-then-PUBLISH, so instances can interleave. The expectation is now stated per phase. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JVDBKbgn3Xt7ndW1YoYd8X