Use settings directly in migrations to avoid noop
migrations. This might have undisered side effects
if we change the config over time 'invalid' data will be
in the database.
It's a simple quick fix.
Keeping some migrations that are no useless to avoid changing
too much the migration history for users.
Similar to https://github.com/suitenumerique/people/commit/
469014ac415b25be0ceed08b31a87d2d40d743cd
Update the sub field documentation to explicitly reflect its optional nature.
Originally intended to be mandatory, sub became optional due to a code issue.
This change acknowledges and formalizes that behavior as intentional.
The optional sub enables external API integrations to provision users with
only an email address. Full identity (sub) is assigned on first login,
allowing third-party platforms to create users before they authenticate.
While refactoring 'Impress' to introduce features from 'Magnify',
few unnecessary changes were traced in the database migrations.
Do some clean up before releasing a first version in production.
I have updated all references of "Impress" to "Meet".
Migrations were manually updated and not regenerated. Never-mind,
they all will be squashed before the first release.
I have also searched for reference to "Magnify", and replaced them
by "Meet".
While updating the backend sources, I have also fixed other parts of
the project, namely:
- Compose file
- Github documentation and CI
- Makefile commands
This commit introduces a boilerplate inspired by https://github.com/numerique-gouv/impress.
The code has been cleaned to remove unnecessary Impress logic and dependencies.
Changes made:
- Removed Minio, WebRTC, and create bucket from the stack.
- Removed the Next.js frontend (it will be replaced by Vite).
- Cleaned up impress-specific backend logics.
The whole stack remains functional:
- All tests pass.
- Linter checks pass.
- Agent Connexion sources are already set-up.
Why clear out the code?
To adhere to the KISS principle, we aim to maintain a minimalist codebase. Cloning Impress
allowed us to quickly inherit its code quality tools and deployment configurations for staging,
pre-production, and production environments.
What’s broken?
- The tsclient is not functional anymore.
- Some make commands need to be fixed.
- Helm sources are outdated.
- Naming across the project sources are inconsistent (impress, visio, etc.)
- CI is not configured properly.
This list might be incomplete. Let's grind it.
Florent Chehab