Add one-time exchange code mechanism for native app OIDC login.
Instead of exposing session ID in redirect URL, generates a
short-lived single-use code stored in Redis. Native apps exchange
this code for the session ID via a dedicated API endpoint.
Includes NativeAppRedirect for custom URL schemes, rate limiting,
logging, and whitelist of allowed schemes.
Closes#1153
Co-Authored-By: gigi206
For the coming features we will need to store files on the meet side.
(for instance user backgrounds).
This commits adds a new Model to manage files, and the associated
serializers & viewsets. All are tested.
This work was heavily inspired by the work done by our friends at
https://github.com/suitenumerique/drive
It build on the same architecture design (upload directly to S3 but
download goes through our proxy), but model is much much simplier
(no folders, no file sharing, etc.).
Introduce ENABLE_EXTERNAL_API setting (defaults to False) to allow
administrators to disable external API endpoints, preventing unintended
exposure for self-hosted instances where such endpoints aren't
needed or desired.
From a security perspective, the list endpoint should be limited to return only
rooms created by the external application. Currently, there is a risk of
exposing public rooms through this endpoint.
I will address this in upcoming commits by updating the room model to track
the source of generation. This will also provide useful information
for analytics.
The API viewset was largely copied and adapted. The serializer was heavily
restricted to return a response more appropriate for external applications,
providing ready-to-use information for their users
(for example, a clickable link).
I plan to extend the room information further, potentially aligning it with the
Google Meet API format. This first draft serves as a solid foundation.
Although scopes for delete and update exist, these methods have not yet been
implemented in the viewset. They will be added in future commits.
This endpoint does not strictly follow the OAuth2 Machine-to-Machine
specification, as we introduce the concept of user delegation (instead of
using the term impersonation).
Typically, OAuth2 M2M is used only to authenticate a machine in server-to-server
exchanges. In our case, we require external applications to act on behalf of a
user in order to assign room ownership and access.
Since these external applications are not integrated with our authorization
server, a workaround was necessary. We treat the delegated user’s email as a
form of scope and issue a JWT to the application if it is authorized to request
it.
Using the term scope for an email may be confusing, but it remains consistent
with OAuth2 vocabulary and allows for future extension, such as supporting a
proper M2M process without any user delegation.
It is important not to confuse the scope in the request body with the scope in
the generated JWT. The request scope refers to the delegated email, while the
JWT scope defines what actions the external application can perform on our
viewset, matching Django’s viewset method naming.
The viewset currently contains a significant amount of logic. I did not find
a clean way to split it without reducing maintainability, but this can be
reconsidered in the future.
Error messages are intentionally vague to avoid exposing sensitive
information to attackers.
Prepare for the introduction of new endpoints reserved for external
applications. Configure the required router and update the Helm chart to ensure
that the Kubernetes ingress properly routes traffic to these new endpoints.
It is important to support independent versioning of both APIs.
Base route’s name aligns with PR #195 on lasuite/drive, opened by @lunika
Implements routes to manage recordings within rooms, following the patterns
established in Impress. The viewset exposes targeted endpoints rather than
full CRUD operations, with recordings being created (soon) through
room-specific routes (e.g. room/123/start-recording).
The implementation draws from @sampaccoud's initial work and advices.
Review focus areas:
- Permission implementation choices
- Serializer design and structure
Credit: Initial work by @sampaccoud
Inspired by Joanie.
In Frontend context, env variables are only available at build time,
not runtime. This is one of the easiest way to pass frontend dynamic
configurations while running.
This commit only exposes the view already existing.
Recent updates of dev/ruff and dev/pylint dependencies led
to new linting warnings.
Pylint 3.2.0 introduced a new check `possibly-used-before-assignment`,
which ensures variables are defined regardless of conditional statements.
Some if/else branches were missing defaults. These have been fixed.
Introduce CRUD API endpoints for the Rooms and ResourceAccess models.
The code follows the Magnify logic, with the exception that token generation
has been removed and replaced by a TODO item with a mocked value.
Proper integration of LiveKit will be added in future commits.
With the removal of group logic, some complex query sets can be simplified.
Previously, we checked for both direct and indirect access to a room.
Indirect access meant a room was shared with a group, and the user was a
member of that group. I haven’t simplified those query set, as I preferred
isolate changes in dedicated commits.
Additionally, all previous tests are still passing, although tests related
to groups have been removed.
This commit introduces a boilerplate inspired by https://github.com/numerique-gouv/impress.
The code has been cleaned to remove unnecessary Impress logic and dependencies.
Changes made:
- Removed Minio, WebRTC, and create bucket from the stack.
- Removed the Next.js frontend (it will be replaced by Vite).
- Cleaned up impress-specific backend logics.
The whole stack remains functional:
- All tests pass.
- Linter checks pass.
- Agent Connexion sources are already set-up.
Why clear out the code?
To adhere to the KISS principle, we aim to maintain a minimalist codebase. Cloning Impress
allowed us to quickly inherit its code quality tools and deployment configurations for staging,
pre-production, and production environments.
What’s broken?
- The tsclient is not functional anymore.
- Some make commands need to be fixed.
- Helm sources are outdated.
- Naming across the project sources are inconsistent (impress, visio, etc.)
- CI is not configured properly.
This list might be incomplete. Let's grind it.
Michel-Marie MAUDET