Fix all typos

src/rpc/layout/graph_algo.rs

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ impl Graph<FlowEdge> {
 	/// This function shuffles the order of the edge lists. It keeps the ids of the
 	/// reversed edges consistent.
 	fn shuffle_edges(&mut self) {
-		// We use deterministic randomness so that the layout calculation algorihtm
+		// We use deterministic randomness so that the layout calculation algorithm
 		// will output the same thing every time it is run. This way, the results
 		// pre-calculated in `garage layout show` will match exactly those used
 		// in practice with `garage layout apply`

src/rpc/layout/helper.rs

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ impl LayoutHelper {
 		// sync_map_min is the minimum value of sync_map among storage nodes
 		// in the cluster (non-gateway nodes only, current and previous layouts).
 		// It is the highest layout version for which we know that all relevant
-		// storage nodes have fullfilled a sync, and therefore it is safe to
+		// storage nodes have fulfilled a sync, and therefore it is safe to
 		// use a read quorum within that layout to ensure consistency.
 		// Gateway nodes are excluded here because they hold no relevant data
 		// (they store the bucket and access key tables, but we don't have

src/rpc/layout/manager.rs

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ impl LayoutManager {
 			Ok(x) => {
 				if x.current().replication_factor != replication_factor.replication_factor() {
 					return Err(Error::Message(format!(
-						"Prevous cluster layout has replication factor {}, which is different than the one specified in the config file ({}). The previous cluster layout can be purged, if you know what you are doing, simply by deleting the `cluster_layout` file in your metadata directory.",
+						"Previous cluster layout has replication factor {}, which is different than the one specified in the config file ({}). The previous cluster layout can be purged, if you know what you are doing, simply by deleting the `cluster_layout` file in your metadata directory.",
 						x.current().replication_factor,
 						replication_factor.replication_factor()
 					)));

src/rpc/layout/mod.rs

@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ mod v010 {
 		/// The versions currently in use in the cluster
 		pub versions: Vec<LayoutVersion>,
 		/// At most 5 of the previous versions, not used by the garage_table
-		/// module, but usefull for the garage_block module to find data blocks
+		/// module, but useful for the garage_block module to find data blocks
 		/// that have not yet been moved
 		pub old_versions: Vec<LayoutVersion>,
 

src/rpc/layout/test.rs

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use crate::replication_mode::ReplicationFactor;
 
 // This function checks that the partition size S computed is at least better than the
 // one given by a very naive algorithm. To do so, we try to run the naive algorithm
-// assuming a partion size of S+1. If we succed, it means that the optimal assignment
+// assuming a partition size of S+1. If we succeed, it means that the optimal assignment
 // was not optimal. The naive algorithm is the following :
 // - we compute the max number of partitions associated to every node, capped at the
 // partition number. It gives the number of tokens of every node.

src/rpc/layout/version.rs

@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ impl LayoutVersion {
 			}
 		}
 
-		// We clear the ring assignemnt data
+		// We clear the ring assignment data
 		self.ring_assignment_data = Vec::<CompactNodeType>::new();
 
 		Ok(Some(old_assignment))