# certctl ACME Server (Built-in) > Last reviewed: 2026-05-05 certctl ships an RFC 8555 + RFC 9773 ARI ACME server endpoint at `/acme/profile//*`. Any RFC 8555 client (cert-manager 1.15+, Caddy, Traefik, win-acme, certbot, Posh-ACME) can integrate with certctl as an ACME issuer with no certctl-side modification — closing the "deploy a certctl agent on every K8s node" friction that costs deals to external PKI vendors today. > **Phase status (2026-05-03):** Phase 6 — full operator-facing > reference. The functional surface is complete (Phases 1a-5); this > doc is the canonical procurement-readability reference. New: client- > walkthrough docs for [cert-manager](../../migration/acme-from-cert-manager.md), > [Caddy](../../migration/acme-from-caddy.md), and > [Traefik](../../migration/acme-from-traefik.md); a dedicated > [threat model](./acme-server-threat-model.md); a section-by-section > RFC 8555 + RFC 9773 conformance statement; a 5-failure-mode > troubleshooting playbook; a tested-clients version pinning table. > Track shipped phases via `git log --grep='acme-server:'`. ## Configuration All ACME-server config uses the `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_*` env-var prefix (distinct from `CERTCTL_ACME_*` which configures the consumer-side issuer connector). The struct definition lives in `internal/config/config.go::ACMEServerConfig`. | Env var | Default | Phase | Description | |--------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------|-------------| | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_ENABLED` | `false` | 1a | Master enable flag. Phase 1a's handler is constructed unconditionally so the registry shape stays stable; routes are registered in `internal/api/router/router.go::RegisterHandlers` regardless. Operators flip this on after configuring per-profile auth_mode. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DEFAULT_AUTH_MODE` | `trust_authenticated` | 1a | Default value for `certificate_profiles.acme_auth_mode` on newly-created profiles. Existing profiles retain their stored value. Per-profile column is the source of truth at request time. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DEFAULT_PROFILE_ID` | `""` | 1a | When set, `/acme/*` shorthand mirrors `/acme/profile//*` for single-profile deployments. When empty, requests to the shorthand return RFC 7807 + RFC 8555 §6.7 `userActionRequired`. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_NONCE_TTL` | `5m` | 1a | How long an issued ACME nonce remains valid before the JWS verifier (Phase 1b) returns `urn:ietf:params:acme:error:badNonce` per RFC 8555 §6.5.1. Tune up if cert-manager + certctl clocks frequently skew. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_TOS_URL` | `""` | 1a | Optional `meta.termsOfService` URL in the directory document. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_WEBSITE` | `""` | 1a | Optional `meta.website` URL in the directory document. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_CAA_IDENTITIES` | (empty) | 1a | Comma-separated `meta.caaIdentities` list. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_EAB_REQUIRED` | `false` | 1a | `meta.externalAccountRequired` advertisement. EAB enforcement is a follow-up; Phase 1a only advertises. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_ORDER_TTL` | `24h` | 2 | Reserved field, parsed in Phase 1a so operators can set it ahead of Phase 2's order endpoints. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_AUTHZ_TTL` | `24h` | 2 | Reserved. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_HTTP01_CONCURRENCY` | `10` | 3 | Reserved. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DNS01_RESOLVER` | `8.8.8.8:53` | 3 | Reserved. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DNS01_CONCURRENCY` | `10` | 3 | Reserved. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_TLSALPN01_CONCURRENCY` | `10` | 3 | Reserved. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_ARI_ENABLED` | `true` | 4 | Toggles the RFC 9773 ARI surface — both the `renewalInfo` URL in the directory document and the GET `/renewal-info/` handler. Set to `false` to drop ARI from the directory; ACME clients fall back to static renewal scheduling. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_ARI_POLL_INTERVAL` | `6h` | 4 | Server-policy `Retry-After` value the ARI handler emits on a 200 response. RFC 9773 §4.2 leaves this server-policy. Tighten to `1h` for short-lived certs; loosen to `24h` for standard 90-day certs. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_RATE_LIMIT_ORDERS_PER_HOUR` | `100` | 5 | Per-account orders/hour cap. `0` disables. Hits return RFC 7807 + RFC 8555 §6.7 `urn:ietf:params:acme:error:rateLimited` with `Retry-After`. In-memory token-bucket; restart wipes the counter (eventual-consistency caps are acceptable). | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_RATE_LIMIT_CONCURRENT_ORDERS` | `5` | 5 | Per-account cap on simultaneously-active orders (status in pending/ready/processing). `0` disables. Same RFC 7807 + RFC 8555 §6.7 problem shape as the per-hour cap. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_RATE_LIMIT_KEY_CHANGE_PER_HOUR` | `5` | 5 | Per-account key-rollover cap. `0` disables. Default 5/hour: rollovers should be rare; a flood is an attack signal. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_RATE_LIMIT_CHALLENGE_RESPONDS_PER_HOUR` | `60` | 5 | Per-challenge-id respond cap. `0` disables. Defends against retry storms from a misbehaving client. Keyed by challenge-id (not account-id) so a flood against one challenge doesn't drain the account's whole budget. | | `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_GC_INTERVAL` | `1m` | 5 | Tick interval for the ACME GC scheduler loop. On each tick: (1) DELETE used / expired nonces; (2) UPDATE pending authzs whose `expires_at < NOW()` to `expired`; (3) UPDATE pending/ready/processing orders whose `expires_at < NOW()` to `invalid`. Each sweep is a single SQL statement; the loop is idempotent + bounded by a 1m per-sweep timeout. `0` disables the loop. | ## Per-profile auth mode Two modes per `certificate_profiles.acme_auth_mode`: - **`trust_authenticated`** (default for internal PKI). The JWS- authenticated ACME account is trusted to issue certs for any identifier the profile policy allows; there is no per-identifier ownership proof. The most common certctl use case. - **`challenge`**. Full HTTP-01 + DNS-01 + TLS-ALPN-01 validation per RFC 8555 §8. Required when certctl is exposing public-trust-style PKI. A single certctl-server can serve both modes simultaneously — the mode is read from the bound profile's column at request time, not cached at server start. Operators can flip a profile's mode via SQL and the next order picks up the new mode without restart. The `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DEFAULT_AUTH_MODE` env var sets the default value for newly-created profiles (e.g. via the certctl API). Existing profile rows retain whatever value they were created with. ## TLS trust bootstrap (read this before configuring cert-manager) When certctl-server uses a self-signed TLS bootstrap cert (`deploy/test/certs/server.crt` is the demo default; see [`docs/tls.md`](./tls.md)), cert-manager 1.15+ will refuse to talk to the directory URL unless the certctl root is trusted. The fix lives in `ClusterIssuer.spec.acme.caBundle`: ```yaml apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: ClusterIssuer metadata: name: certctl-test spec: acme: server: https://certctl.example.com:8443/acme/profile/prof-corp/directory email: ops@example.com caBundle: | LS0tLS1CRUdJTi... # base64-encoded PEM of certctl's self-signed root privateKeySecretRef: name: certctl-test-account-key solvers: - http01: ingress: class: nginx ``` The `caBundle` value is the base64-encoded PEM of the root that signed your certctl-server's TLS certificate. Extract it from your operator bootstrap (e.g. `cat deploy/test/certs/ca.crt | base64 -w0`). This is the single biggest first-time-deploy footgun on the cert-manager integration path. The full cert-manager walkthrough lands in Phase 6; the `caBundle` requirement is flagged here in Phase 1a's docs because operators hit it the moment they try to point a real ACME client at certctl. ## Auth-mode decision tree Use `trust_authenticated` when: - The certctl deployment serves **internal-only PKI** (intranet certs, service-mesh certs, IoT bootstrap). Identifiers in your CSRs are controlled by your infrastructure, not by the public Internet. - You don't have HTTP/DNS reachability **from certctl-server back to the ACME client's solver** (e.g., the client lives in an isolated network segment certctl-server can't reach). - You want the simplest cert-manager integration: cert-manager submits a CSR, certctl issues; no out-of-band ownership proof. - You're issuing under your own root CA whose trust is operator-managed (NOT WebPKI). Public CAs cannot use this mode — RFC 8555 §8 ownership proof is non-negotiable for public-trust roots. Use `challenge` when: - The deployment is **public-trust-style PKI** — even if your root is privately operated, you want CA/Browser Forum-style ownership-proof semantics so a stolen account key can't be used to issue for arbitrary identifiers. - You have HTTP-01 / DNS-01 / TLS-ALPN-01 reachability from the certctl-server to the ACME client's solver. (HTTP-01 needs port 80 ingress to the client; DNS-01 needs DNS recursion; TLS-ALPN-01 needs port 443 ingress.) - You want defense-in-depth: an account-key compromise costs the attacker nothing without also compromising the solver-side infrastructure. A single certctl-server can run both modes simultaneously — the auth mode is a per-profile column on `certificate_profiles.acme_auth_mode`, read at request time. Operators flip a profile's mode via SQL or the profile API, and the next order picks up the new mode without restart. ## Endpoints Routes registered in `internal/api/router/router.go::RegisterHandlers`: | Method | Path | RFC ref | Auth | Description | |--------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|-------------| | GET | `/acme/profile/{id}/directory` | RFC 8555 §7.1.1 | unauth | Per-profile directory document. | | HEAD | `/acme/profile/{id}/new-nonce` | RFC 8555 §7.2 | unauth | Returns 200 + Replay-Nonce header. | | GET | `/acme/profile/{id}/new-nonce` | RFC 8555 §7.2 | unauth | Returns 204 + Replay-Nonce header. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/new-account` | RFC 8555 §7.3 | JWS jwk | Register a new account; idempotent re-registration of an existing JWK returns the existing row. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/account/{acc_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.3.2 + §7.3.6 | JWS kid | Update contact list, deactivate, or POST-as-GET (RFC 8555 §6.3) to fetch the account. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/new-order` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | Submit an order; identifier validation runs before order creation. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/order/{ord_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | POST-as-GET fetch of an order's current state. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/order/{ord_id}/finalize` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | Submit the CSR + finalize. Issues + persists managed cert row + version. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/authz/{authz_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.5 | JWS kid | POST-as-GET fetch of an authorization. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/challenge/{chall_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.5.1 | JWS kid | Submit a challenge for validation. Dispatches to a bounded-concurrency worker pool; clients poll authz for the eventual result. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/cert/{cert_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.4.2 | JWS kid | POST-as-GET cert chain download (PEM). | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/key-change` | RFC 8555 §7.3.5 | JWS kid (outer) + jwk (inner) | Doubly-signed account-key rollover. | | POST | `/acme/profile/{id}/revoke-cert` | RFC 8555 §7.6 | JWS kid OR jwk | Revoke a cert via the issuing account's key OR the cert's own private key. Routes through the certctl revocation pipeline. | | GET | `/acme/profile/{id}/renewal-info/{cert_id}` | RFC 9773 | unauth | Fetch the suggested renewal window for a cert (cert-id is `base64url(AKI).base64url(serial)` per RFC 9773 §4.1). Response carries `Retry-After`. | | GET | `/acme/directory` | RFC 8555 §7.1.1 | unauth | Shorthand path; mirrors per-profile when `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DEFAULT_PROFILE_ID` is set. | | HEAD | `/acme/new-nonce` | RFC 8555 §7.2 | unauth | Shorthand. | | GET | `/acme/new-nonce` | RFC 8555 §7.2 | unauth | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/new-account` | RFC 8555 §7.3 | JWS jwk | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/account/{acc_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.3.2 + §7.3.6 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/new-order` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/order/{ord_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/order/{ord_id}/finalize` | RFC 8555 §7.4 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/authz/{authz_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.5 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/cert/{cert_id}` | RFC 8555 §7.4.2 | JWS kid | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/key-change` | RFC 8555 §7.3.5 | JWS kid (outer) + jwk (inner) | Shorthand. | | POST | `/acme/revoke-cert` | RFC 8555 §7.6 | JWS kid OR jwk | Shorthand. | | GET | `/acme/renewal-info/{cert_id}` | RFC 9773 | unauth | Shorthand. | After Phase 4, the full RFC 8555 + RFC 9773 surface is live. RFC 8739 (short-lived certs) and EAB enforcement remain follow-up work; cert- manager + boulder-tested clients work today against the surface above. ## RFC 8555 + RFC 9773 conformance statement Honest disclosure of what's implemented, where, and what's not. Procurement engineers running gap analyses against cert-manager + Let's Encrypt's conformance posture should read this section before anything else. ### Implemented | Section | Surface | Phase | First commit | |---------|---------|-------|--------------| | RFC 8555 §6.2 | JWS auth + RS256/ES256/EdDSA allow-list | 1b | `27bd660` | | RFC 8555 §6.3 | POST-as-GET | 1b | `27bd660` | | RFC 8555 §6.4 | URL-header binding to request URL | 1b | `27bd660` | | RFC 8555 §6.5 | Replay-Nonce + DB-backed nonce store | 1a | `e146b00` | | RFC 8555 §6.7 | RFC 7807 problem documents | 1a | `e146b00` | | RFC 8555 §7.1 | Directory | 1a | `e146b00` | | RFC 8555 §7.2 | new-nonce HEAD + GET | 1a | `e146b00` | | RFC 8555 §7.3 | new-account + idempotent re-registration | 1b | `27bd660` | | RFC 8555 §7.3.2 + §7.3.6 | account update + deactivation | 1b | `27bd660` | | RFC 8555 §7.3.5 | doubly-signed key rollover | 4 | `0299e4a` | | RFC 8555 §7.4 | new-order + finalize + cert download | 2 | `4ee486e` | | RFC 8555 §7.5 | authz POST-as-GET | 2 | `4ee486e` | | RFC 8555 §7.5.1 | challenge response | 3 | `7e22204` | | RFC 8555 §7.6 | revoke-cert (kid + jwk paths) | 4 | `0299e4a` | | RFC 8555 §8.3 | HTTP-01 challenge validator | 3 | `7e22204` | | RFC 8555 §8.4 | DNS-01 challenge validator | 3 | `7e22204` | | RFC 8737 | TLS-ALPN-01 challenge validator | 3 | `7e22204` | | RFC 9773 | ACME Renewal Information (ARI) | 4 | `0299e4a` | ### Not implemented (procurement-honest) | Spec area | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | RFC 8555 §7.3.4 — External Account Binding (EAB) | **Not implemented.** | Advertised in directory `meta.externalAccountRequired` but enforcement is a follow-up. Operators relying on EAB for account-creation gating should layer an upstream WAF. | | RFC 8555 §8.4 + §7.4 — Wildcard with `*.` prefix > 1 level | **Not implemented.** | Single-level wildcards (e.g. `*.example.com`) work end-to-end. Multi-level wildcards (`*.*.example.com`) are RFC-spec-ambiguous and rejected at the identifier-validation layer. | | RFC 8738 — Short-lived certs | **Not implemented.** | Operators wanting <7-day validity tune the bound issuer's TTL directly via `CertificateProfile.MaxTTLSeconds`; the ACME wire shape doesn't expose a separate notion. | | Cross-CA proxying | **Not implemented.** | Each profile binds to one issuer. Multi-CA federation (one ACME account → multi-CA selection per identifier) is roadmap. | | RFC 8555 §6.7 — `accountDoesNotExist` problem with hint URL | Partial. | Sentinel returns `accountDoesNotExist`; the optional hint URL embedding the `kid` is not emitted. cert-manager doesn't consume it. | If a procurement-side gap analysis turns up something not in either table above, the answer is "we don't know yet" — operator-side issues welcome. ## Finalize routing through `CertificateService.Create` (Phase 2 architecture) The finalize path mirrors how every other certctl issuance surface (EST, SCEP, agent, REST API) routes through the canonical pipeline: 1. JWS-verify the request (`internal/api/acme/jws.go`). 2. Validate the CSR's DNS-name set equals the order's identifier set exactly (case-folded). Mismatches return RFC 8555 `urn:ietf:params:acme:error:badCSR`. 3. Update the order row to `status=processing` (`s.tx.WithinTx` + `auditService.RecordEventWithTx` — atomic with audit row). 4. Issue the cert via the bound profile's `IssuerConnector` adapter (same `IssueCertificate(ctx, commonName, sans, csrPEM, ekus, maxTTLSeconds, mustStaple)` call EST/SCEP/agent take). 5. Insert the `managed_certificates` row via `service.CertificateService.Create(ctx, *ManagedCertificate, actor)`. Source is stamped `domain.CertificateSourceACME` so operators can bulk-revoke ACME-issued certs by filtering on `Source=ACME`. 6. Insert the `certificate_versions` row + transition the order to `status=valid` with `certificate_id` set (one final `WithinTx` covering both writes + the audit row). This means RenewalPolicy, CertificateProfile, per-issuer-type Prometheus metrics, audit rows, and revocation-pipeline integration all apply uniformly to ACME-issued certs via the same code path that already serves EST/SCEP/agent/REST issuance. The atomicity boundary: there is a brief window between step 5 (cert exists) and step 6 (order shows valid) where the order row still says `processing`. Phase 5's GC scheduler reconciles. The actor string on audit rows is `acme:`. ## JWS verification (Phase 1b) Every JWS-authenticated POST runs through the verifier at `internal/api/acme/jws.go::VerifyJWS`. The verifier enforces: 1. The JWS parses as a flattened single-signature object (multi-sig is rejected per RFC 8555 §6.2). 2. The signature algorithm is in the closed allow-list `{RS256, ES256, EdDSA}` per RFC 8555 §6.2 — `none`, `HS256`, and every other alg are refused at parse time. 3. The protected header carries exactly one of `kid` (registered account) or `jwk` (new-account flow); endpoints declare which they require. 4. The protected header `url` matches the inbound request URL exactly. 5. The protected header `nonce` is consumed against the `acme_nonces` store; missing / replayed / expired nonces return `urn:ietf:params:acme:error:badNonce` per RFC 8555 §6.5.1. 6. On the `kid` path: the kid URL round-trips against the canonical per-profile shape, the referenced account exists, and its status is `valid`. Deactivated / revoked accounts cannot authenticate. 7. The signature verifies against the resolved key (registered account's stored JWK on the kid path; embedded jwk on the jwk path). Every state-mutating account operation (create, contact update, deactivate) writes its `acme_accounts` row and an `audit_events` row inside one `repository.Transactor.WithinTx` call — the canonical certctl atomicity contract (matches `service.CertificateService.Create` at `internal/service/certificate.go:131`). ## Phases (cross-reference) | Phase | Status | Surface | |-------|-------------|---------| | 1a | live | directory + new-nonce + per-profile routing | | 1b | live | new-account + account/{id} + JWS verifier (RFC 7515 + go-jose v4) | | 2 | live | orders + authzs + finalize + cert download (trust_authenticated mode end-to-end) | | 3 | live | HTTP-01 + DNS-01 + TLS-ALPN-01 challenge validation (challenge mode end-to-end) | | 4 | live | key rollover (RFC 8555 §7.3.5) + revoke-cert (§7.6) + ARI (RFC 9773) | | 5 | live | rate limits + GC sweeper + kind-driven cert-manager integration test + lego conformance harness + k6 ACME-flow scenario | | 6 | live | full operator-facing reference + walkthroughs (cert-manager / Caddy / Traefik) + threat model + RFC-8555 conformance statement + troubleshooting + version pinning | Track shipped phases via `git log --grep='acme-server:' --oneline`. ## Operational notes (Phase 1a) - **Schema:** `migrations/000025_acme_server.up.sql` adds 5 ACME tables + the `certificate_profiles.acme_auth_mode` column. Phase 1a actively uses only `acme_nonces`. The full schema ships now so the migration is stable and Phases 1b-4 don't need additional `CREATE TABLE` migrations. - **Replay protection:** nonces are persisted in `acme_nonces` (NOT in-memory). They survive server restart, which is required for the RFC 8555 §6.5 replay defense to hold against a multi-replica certctl-server fleet behind a load balancer. - **Metrics:** the service layer exposes per-op atomic counters via `service.ACMEService.Metrics().Snapshot()`: - `certctl_acme_directory_total` - `certctl_acme_directory_failures_total` - `certctl_acme_new_nonce_total` - `certctl_acme_new_nonce_failures_total` Phase 1b will extend with `new_account` counters; Phase 2 with order / finalize / cert; Phase 3 with per-challenge-type counters. - **Audit:** Phase 1a is read-mostly (directory + nonce). Phase 1b's account-creation path will route through the canonical `s.tx.WithinTx(...)` + `auditService.RecordEventWithTx(...)` pattern so every account state mutation is paired with an `audit_events` row. ## Phase 4 — key rollover, revocation, ARI ### How do I rotate my ACME account key? RFC 8555 §7.3.5 defines a doubly-signed JWS for the rollover. The OUTER JWS is signed by the OLD account key (kid path); its payload IS the INNER JWS, which is signed by the NEW account key (jwk path). cert- manager and lego do this for you transparently — `lego renew --key-rotate` or the cert-manager `Issuer.spec.acme.privateKeySecretRef` rollover. Server-side validation: 1. Outer JWS verifies against the registered account's current key. 2. Inner JWS verifies against the embedded NEW jwk (proves possession). 3. Inner payload `account` matches outer `kid`. 4. Inner payload `oldKey` thumbprint-equals the registered key. 5. Inner protected `url` equals outer protected `url`. 6. New JWK thumbprint not already registered against the same profile. 7. `SELECT … FOR UPDATE` on the account row serializes concurrent rollovers; the loser sees the winner's new thumbprint and is told to retry (409). ### How do I revoke an ACME-issued cert? Two auth paths per RFC 8555 §7.6: - **kid path:** sign with your account key. The server checks the account "owns" the cert via `acme_orders.certificate_id` lookup. - **jwk path:** sign with the cert's own private key. The server extracts the cert's public key, computes the JWK, and asserts it matches the embedded jwk thumbprint. Either path routes through `service.RevocationSvc.RevokeCertificateWithActor` — the same pipeline the GUI revoke button, bulk-revocation, and the ACME-consumer issuer use. So the cert-row update + revocation row + audit row are all atomic in one `WithinTx`, the issuer is best-effort notified, and the OCSP response cache is invalidated. Reason codes follow RFC 5280 §5.3.1; codes 8 (removeFromCRL) and 10 (aACompromise) are not in certctl's `domain.ValidRevocationReasons` set so they clamp to `unspecified`. ### What is ARI? RFC 9773 ACME Renewal Information. Clients GET `/acme/profile//renewal-info/` (unauthenticated) and receive a JSON document with `suggestedWindow.start` and `.end` — the server's recommendation for when to renew. The response also carries `Retry-After` (RFC 9773 §4.2) hinting at the next-poll cadence. Cert-id format is `base64url(authorityKeyIdentifier).base64url(serial)` per RFC 9773 §4.1. Window math: - Cert with a bound renewal policy: window starts at `notAfter - RenewalWindowDays`, ends at `notAfter - RenewalWindowDays/2`. So a 30-day window cert with notAfter 2026-06-30 emits start=2026-05-31, end=2026-06-15. Boulder-shape default that lets cert-manager schedule inside our renewal window. - No policy: window is the last 33% of validity. - Past expiry: window is "now" → "now + 24h" (renew immediately). Disable ARI globally with `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_ARI_ENABLED=false`. The URL drops out of the directory; the route is still registered but returns 404 — clients fall back to static renewal scheduling. ## Phase 5 — operational guidance ### Rate limiting Production deployments serving multiple ACME profiles or fleets should keep the default rate limits in place. The four caps: - `RATE_LIMIT_ORDERS_PER_HOUR` (100) — per-account new-order cap. A cert-manager Certificate that auto-renews at the 1/3 mark of its validity (90-day cert → ~30-day renewal) consumes ~12 orders/year per managed Certificate. 100/hour is generous for any plausible fleet. - `RATE_LIMIT_CONCURRENT_ORDERS` (5) — per-account cap on pending/ready/processing orders. Stops a runaway client from starving DB-row throughput. Tune up only if you observe legitimate bursts. - `RATE_LIMIT_KEY_CHANGE_PER_HOUR` (5) — rollovers are rare; a flood is an attack signal. Tune down to 1/hour if your operator procedure mandates manual rollovers only. - `RATE_LIMIT_CHALLENGE_RESPONDS_PER_HOUR` (60) — per-challenge cap, defends against retry storms. Hits return RFC 8555 §6.7 `rateLimited` Problem with a `Retry-After` header. cert-manager 1.15+ honors the header; lego too. Older clients may not — that's the client's problem, not certctl's. The buckets are **in-memory + per-replica**. A 3-replica certctl- server fleet behind a load balancer effectively has 3× the configured throughput (each replica's bucket fills independently). For deployments where this matters operationally, the right answer is a shared rate-limit store — that's a follow-up; not blocking for the current threat model where same-account requests typically pin to the same replica via session affinity. ### GC sweeper The scheduler runs the GC sweep every `GC_INTERVAL` (default 1m). Each sweep is three independent SQL statements: 1. `DELETE FROM acme_nonces WHERE used = TRUE OR expires_at < NOW()`. 2. `UPDATE acme_authorizations SET status='expired' WHERE status='pending' AND expires_at < NOW()`. 3. `UPDATE acme_orders SET status='invalid', error=... WHERE status IN ('pending','ready','processing') AND expires_at < NOW()`. Each statement is bounded by a 1-minute per-sweep timeout. A failing sweep is logged + retried on the next tick; a tick that overruns its budget is skipped (the existing-tick atomic-Bool guard prevents overlap). Counts are exposed via `certctl_acme_gc_*` Prometheus metrics. ### cert-manager integration test `make acme-cert-manager-test` brings up a kind cluster, installs cert-manager 1.15.0, helm-deploys certctl-server with `acmeServer.enabled=true`, and verifies a Certificate resource issues end-to-end. Skipped in CI by default (kind is too heavy for per-PR); operators run locally on workstation. See `deploy/test/acme-integration/` for the YAML + Go test harness. ### lego RFC conformance harness `make acme-rfc-conformance-test` drives lego v4 against a hermetic certctl-server stack, exercising register → new-order → finalize. Operators run this when shipping behavior changes to the ACME surface to confirm a real third-party client still works. ### k6 ACME flows scenario `deploy/test/loadtest/k6/acme_flow.js` exercises the unauthenticated surface (directory + new-nonce + ARI) at 100 VUs × 5m. JWS-signed flows are out of scope for k6 (no JWS support); they're covered by the lego conformance harness above. Baseline numbers + thresholds in `deploy/test/loadtest/README.md`. ## Troubleshooting The five failure modes operators hit most often + the canonical fix for each. ### `cert-manager logs: 400 Bad Request: badNonce` **Cause:** Either a nonce was replayed (a buggy client retries the same JWS), the cert-manager + certctl-server clocks differ by more than `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_NONCE_TTL` (default 5 min), or the nonce-store row was reaped between issuance and use. **Fix:** First check NTP on both sides. If clocks are healthy, lengthen `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_NONCE_TTL` to 10m or 15m. If the problem persists, check for a multi-replica certctl-server fleet without sticky session affinity — the nonce DB row lives on one replica; if the JWS POST hits a different replica before replication catches up, you observe spurious `badNonce`. Solution: pin client sessions to a single replica via load-balancer cookie / `kid`-hash routing, OR shorten replication lag if your DB is the bottleneck. ### `cert-manager logs: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority` **Cause:** cert-manager refuses to talk to the directory URL because its TLS chain doesn't terminate at a root in cert-manager's trust store. certctl-server's bootstrap cert (Phase 1a, `deploy/test/certs/server.crt`) is self-signed. **Fix:** Add the `caBundle` field to your `ClusterIssuer.spec.acme` — see the [TLS trust bootstrap](#tls-trust-bootstrap-read-this-before-configuring-cert-manager) section above for the 3-step recipe. This is **the** single biggest first-time-deploy footgun on the cert-manager integration path. ### HTTP-01 validator returns `connection refused` **Cause:** The HTTP-01 solver's Ingress / Service is not reachable from certctl-server's network. Common subcases: (a) the cert-manager http-solver pod is on a private network certctl-server can't reach; (b) a firewall blocks port 80 inbound to the solver's address; (c) the Ingress class annotation doesn't match an installed ingress controller; (d) your DNS still points at an old IP. **Fix:** From the certctl-server pod, `curl -v http:///.well-known/acme-challenge/` and read the network error. If the curl fails the same way, the network path is the issue. If curl works but the validator fails, check the validator log lines — the SSRF guard rejects reserved IPs (RFC1918, link-local, cloud-metadata 169.254.169.254). Public-trust style profiles that need to reach RFC1918 solvers must be moved to `trust_authenticated` mode OR the solver must be exposed on a routable address. ### DNS-01 validator returns `NXDOMAIN` **Cause:** DNS provider hasn't propagated the `_acme-challenge.` TXT record yet. Most providers have a 30s-2m propagation lag. cert-manager retries by default, but Phase-5 rate limits (default 60/hour per challenge-id) can truncate the retry budget. **Fix:** Verify TXT propagation with `dig +short TXT _acme-challenge. @`. If the answer is empty, the issue is upstream. If it's populated but certctl reports NXDOMAIN, check `CERTCTL_ACME_SERVER_DNS01_RESOLVER` (default `8.8.8.8:53`) is reachable from certctl-server's network egress. Operators on isolated networks need a private resolver; configure accordingly + own the cache-poisoning posture (see [threat model](./acme-server-threat-model.md)). ### Certificate Ready=False with `rejectedIdentifier` **Cause:** The CSR includes an identifier (CommonName or SAN) that the bound certificate profile's policy rejects. certctl runs syntactic + profile-policy validation **before** order creation; the order never reaches the database. **Fix:** The reject reason is in the `subproblems` array of the RFC 8555 §6.7 problem document. Decode the JSON, look at `subproblems[].detail`, and adjust either the CSR or the profile policy. Common causes: SAN-not-in-`AllowedIdentifierWildcards`, EKU-not-in-`AllowedEKUs`, TTL-exceeds-`MaxTTLSeconds`. Validation logic lives in `internal/api/acme/identifier.go::ValidateIdentifiers` + `internal/domain/profile.go` — read those if the profile-policy rule isn't obvious. ## Version pinning + tested clients certctl's ACME server is tested against the following client versions. Other versions probably work; these are the ones the integration suite exercises end-to-end. | Client | Tested version | Where it's pinned | |--------|----------------|-------------------| | cert-manager | 1.15.0 | `deploy/test/acme-integration/cert-manager-install.sh::CERT_MANAGER_VERSION` | | lego (RFC 8555 conformance harness) | v4.x latest | `deploy/test/acme-integration/conformance-lego.sh` (operator installs via `go install github.com/go-acme/lego/v4/cmd/lego@latest`) | | kind (cluster bootstrap) | v0.20+ | `deploy/test/acme-integration/kind-config.yaml` schema requirement | | Caddy | 2.7.x | Phase 6 walkthrough (`docs/acme-caddy-walkthrough.md`) | | Traefik | 3.0+ | Phase 6 walkthrough (`docs/acme-traefik-walkthrough.md`) | Operators reporting issues with untested-version clients should include the client version + the precise wire-level error (curl-captured request + response body) so we can pin a regression test if applicable. ## FAQ ### Why two auth modes? Isn't `challenge` strictly more secure? `challenge` is strictly more secure for **public-trust** PKI — RFC 8555 §8 ownership proof is the entire point of cert-manager + Let's Encrypt. For **internal PKI**, the threat model is different: the network itself is the security boundary (mTLS service mesh, firewalled VPC, identifier- namespace controlled by the operator). Forcing every internal cert to go through a solver round-trip adds operational toil with no security gain. `trust_authenticated` is the certctl-specific mode that acknowledges this — the ACME account is the proof, not the solver. ### How does this differ from `cert-manager → Let's Encrypt with certctl as a separate step`? Two integrations vs one. With certctl as the ACME endpoint, cert-manager does its native flow (Certificate → Order → CSR → Secret) and certctl mints the cert directly, recording it under its own `managed_certificates` table with full audit + renewal-policy + bulk- revocation surface. With Let's Encrypt as the ACME endpoint, you have to run a separate cert-manager-uploads-to-certctl webhook OR maintain two parallel cert tracks. The native-ACME-server path is operationally simpler. ### Can I use ACME endpoints from outside the K8s cluster? Yes. The endpoints are HTTPS over the certctl-server's listener (port 8443 by default). Caddy on a VM, win-acme on a Windows server, or Posh-ACME on a Mac all integrate against `https://:8443/acme/profile//directory`. The TLS-trust-bootstrap requirement applies the same way — see the [Caddy walkthrough](../../migration/acme-from-caddy.md) for the OS-trust-store recipe. ### How do I migrate manually-issued certs to ACME-issued ones? Not yet automatic. Operators migrating: keep the old `managed_certificates` rows; create new ones via the ACME flow; flip targets one by one. A dedicated bulk-migration tool is on the roadmap (post-2.1.0). Track via the master prompt's roadmap section in `cowork/acme-server-endpoint-prompt.md`. ### What audit-log events fire on each ACME operation? Every state mutation writes an `audit_events` row. Actor strings: `acme:` for kid-path requests; `acme-cert-key:` for jwk-path revoke; `acme-system:gc` for scheduler-driven sweeps. Event-name catalog: | Event name | Fired by | Resource type | |------------|----------|---------------| | `acme_account_created` | new-account | `acme_account` | | `acme_account_contact_updated` | account update | `acme_account` | | `acme_account_deactivated` | account deactivate | `acme_account` | | `acme_account_key_rolled` | key-change | `acme_account` | | `acme_order_created` | new-order | `acme_order` | | `acme_order_finalized` | finalize | `acme_order` | | `acme_challenge_processing` | challenge-respond (dispatch) | `acme_challenge` | | `acme_challenge_completed` | validator callback | `acme_challenge` | | `certificate_revoked` | revoke-cert (routes through `RevocationSvc`) | `certificate` | Querying by actor prefix (`actor LIKE 'acme:%'`) reconstructs the full history of any ACME-issued cert. ### Is there a threat model document? Yes — [`docs/acme-server-threat-model.md`](./acme-server-threat-model.md). Read before writing a security review. ## See also - [cert-manager integration walkthrough](../../migration/acme-from-cert-manager.md) - [Caddy integration walkthrough](../../migration/acme-from-caddy.md) - [Traefik integration walkthrough](../../migration/acme-from-traefik.md) - [Threat model](./acme-server-threat-model.md) - [TLS trust bootstrap reference](./tls.md) - [Architecture (control-plane)](./architecture.md)