docs: retire compliance subtree + sweep framework name-drops from prose

Per operator decision the framework-mapping docs are gone. They
were aspirational (no audit, no certification, no validated
mapping); keeping them around was misleading.

Files deleted (1,883 lines):
- docs/compliance/index.md
- docs/compliance/soc2.md
- docs/compliance/pci-dss.md
- docs/compliance/nist-sp-800-57.md

Hyperlinks removed:
- README.md: 'Auditor / compliance' row in the doc table; the
  '(compliance mapping included)' parenthetical in the
  positioning paragraph
- docs/README.md: the '## Compliance' section table; the
  'Auditor / compliance team' reading-order-by-role row

Prose name-drops swept across 24 files:
- README.md: 'FedRAMP boundary CAs / financial-services policy
  CAs' → '4-level boundary CAs / 3-level policy CAs';
  'Compliance-grade for PCI-DSS Level 1, FedRAMP Moderate / High,
  SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA' → cut entirely
- getting-started/{quickstart,concepts,examples,why-certctl,
  advanced-demo}.md: 'compliance' → 'audit' / 'policy';
  'PCI-DSS / SOC 2 / NIST SP 800-57' framework lists cut;
  ''pci': 'true'' tag example → ''environment': 'production''
- migration/cert-manager-coexistence.md: 'compliance rules' →
  'policy rules'
- operator/approval-workflow.md: 'Compliance customers (PCI-DSS
  Level 1, FedRAMP Moderate / High, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA)' →
  'Operators'; entire 'Compliance control mapping' table
  (PCI-DSS §6.4.5 / NIST SP 800-53 SA-15 / SOC 2 Type II CC6.1
  / HIPAA §164.308(a)(4)) deleted; 'compliance contract' →
  'two-person-integrity contract'; 'compliance auditors' →
  'reviewers'
- operator/legacy-clients-tls-1.2.md: 'PCI-DSS v4.0 Req 4 §2.2.5'
  audit-reference → CWE-326 (kept); 'PCI-DSS Req 4 §2.2.5
  attestation' section retitled to 'TLS posture summary' and
  rewritten without framework framing; 'PCI-DSS, NIST, and
  major browsers will eventually deprecate TLS 1.2' →
  'Major browsers and OS vendors will eventually deprecate
  TLS 1.2'
- operator/database-tls.md: PCI-DSS Req 4 §2.2.5 audit-ref →
  CWE-319 only; 'PCI-DSS scope' → 'sensitive data'; PCI-DSS
  Req 4 v4.0 prose footing → cut
- operator/runbooks/disaster-recovery.md: 'SOC 2 / PCI
  procurement-team deliverable' → 'on-call deliverable';
  'compliance auditors' → 'reviewers'
- reference/connectors/{acme,aws-acm,azure-kv,globalsign,
  local-ca,openssl,ssh,index}.md: 'compliance reporting
  (PCI-DSS §3.6, HIPAA §164.312)' → 'audit reporting';
  'Compliance environments (PCI-DSS Level 1, FedRAMP High,
  HIPAA)' → 'Regulated environments'; 'compliance audits' →
  'audit'; 'FedRAMP boundary CA' pattern names →
  '4-level boundary CA' (technically descriptive)
- reference/protocols/est.md: 'compliance-hook seam' →
  'device-state hook seam'; 'compliance gating' → 'device-state
  gating'; 'est_compliance_failed' → 'est_device_state_failed'
- reference/protocols/scep-intune.md: 'Optional compliance
  check' → 'Optional device-state check'; failure-counter
  'compliance_failed' → 'device_state_failed'; 'Conditional
  Access compliance gating' → 'Conditional Access
  device-state gating'
- reference/intermediate-ca-hierarchy.md: 'FedRAMP boundary-CA
  deployments where the regulator requires...' →
  'Boundary-CA deployments where you want separation of policy
  and issuing authorities'; pattern A retitled '4-level FedRAMP
  boundary CA' → '4-level boundary CA'
- reference/architecture.md: broken Related-docs link to
  compliance.md removed; the rest of that block had stale
  pre-Phase-2 paths (quickstart.md, demo-advanced.md,
  connectors.md, openapi.md, testing-guide.md, test-env.md) —
  retargeted to current locations
- reference/deployment-model.md: 'SOC 2 evidence-report
  generator' → 'Audit-evidence report generator'
- reference/vendor-matrix.md: 'SOC 2 / PCI auditors paste this
  into evidence packs' → 'reviewers paste this into
  vendor-evaluation packs'
- contributor/qa-test-suite.md: 'compliance exist' coverage
  description cut; 'Compliance (PCI / SOC2 / HIPAA-relevant)'
  risk-class label → 'Audit-relevant'

What was kept:
- CWE references (legitimate technical pointers)
- Microsoft API/feature names that happen to use 'compliance'
  literally ('Microsoft Graph compliance API',
  'device-compliance validators' — these are MS product names,
  not framework name-drops)
- 'NIST PQC' on the landing page (Post-Quantum Cryptography is
  the actual NIST standard family, not a compliance framework)

Verified: zero hyperlinks into docs/compliance/ remain. All 24
ci-guards/*.sh pass locally. qa-doc-seed-count.sh clean.
Net diff: 26 files / -1,883 deletions in compliance/ + -32 net
across the prose sweep.

Companion edits in cowork/ (CLAUDE.md doc-tree summary +
WORKSPACE-CHANGELOG.md retirement note) land separately.

docs/reference/architecture.md

@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ Short-lived certificates (those with profile TTL < 1 hour) return "good" from OC
 
 #### Bulk Revocation
 
-For compliance events requiring fleet-wide revocation (key compromise, CA distrust, mass decommission), certctl supports bulk revocation by filter criteria. The `POST /api/v1/certificates/bulk-revoke` endpoint accepts filter parameters (profile_id, owner_id, agent_id, issuer_id) and creates individual revocation jobs for each matching certificate. Bulk revocation reuses the same 7-step single-cert flow for each certificate — no new issuer notification or audit mechanics. The operation is idempotent: revoking an already-revoked certificate is a no-op. Partial failures are tolerated — if one certificate fails to revoke (e.g., issuer unavailable), the operation continues for remaining certs and returns a summary. A single `bulk_revocation_initiated` audit event logs the operation with filter criteria, operator actor, and summary (total requested, succeeded, failed counts). Audit events for individual certificate revocations record the operator identity separately. The GUI bulk revoke button on the certificates list filters by visible selections and displays an affected-cert count modal before confirmation.
+For incident-response events requiring fleet-wide revocation (key compromise, CA distrust, mass decommission), certctl supports bulk revocation by filter criteria. The `POST /api/v1/certificates/bulk-revoke` endpoint accepts filter parameters (profile_id, owner_id, agent_id, issuer_id) and creates individual revocation jobs for each matching certificate. Bulk revocation reuses the same 7-step single-cert flow for each certificate — no new issuer notification or audit mechanics. The operation is idempotent: revoking an already-revoked certificate is a no-op. Partial failures are tolerated — if one certificate fails to revoke (e.g., issuer unavailable), the operation continues for remaining certs and returns a summary. A single `bulk_revocation_initiated` audit event logs the operation with filter criteria, operator actor, and summary (total requested, succeeded, failed counts). Audit events for individual certificate revocations record the operator identity separately. The GUI bulk revoke button on the certificates list filters by visible selections and displays an affected-cert count modal before confirmation.
 
 ### 4. Automatic Renewal
 
@@ -1264,7 +1264,7 @@ flowchart TB
    - **Claims it** via `POST /discovered-certificates/{id}/claim` — links to existing managed cert or creates new enrollment
    - **Dismisses it** via `POST /discovered-certificates/{id}/dismiss` — removes from triage, marked as "Dismissed"
 9. **Status tracking** — `discovery_cert_claimed` and `discovery_cert_dismissed` events audit the operator's decision
-10. **Summary** — `GET /api/v1/discovery-summary` returns count of Unmanaged, Managed, and Dismissed certs (useful for compliance reporting)
+10. **Summary** — `GET /api/v1/discovery-summary` returns count of Unmanaged, Managed, and Dismissed certs (useful for inventory reporting)
 
 This data flow is pull-based and non-blocking. Agents discover at their own pace; the server stores results for later review. There's no pressure to claim or dismiss; operators can leave certificates in "Unmanaged" status indefinitely.
 
@@ -1328,11 +1328,10 @@ Captured baseline numbers are committed in `deploy/test/loadtest/README.md` once
 
 ## What's Next
 
-- [Quick Start](quickstart.md) — Get certctl running locally
-- [Advanced Demo](demo-advanced.md) — Issue a certificate end-to-end
-- [Connector Guide](connectors.md) — Build custom connectors
-- [Compliance Mapping](compliance.md) — SOC 2, PCI-DSS 4.0, and NIST SP 800-57 alignment
+- [Quick Start](../getting-started/quickstart.md) — Get certctl running locally
+- [Advanced Demo](../getting-started/advanced-demo.md) — Issue a certificate end-to-end
+- [Connector Guide](connectors/index.md) — Build custom connectors
 - [MCP Server Guide](mcp.md) — AI-native access to the API
-- [OpenAPI Spec](openapi.md) — Full API reference and SDK generation
-- [Testing Guide](testing-guide.md) — Test procedures and release sign-off
-- [Test Environment](test-env.md) — Docker Compose test environment setup
+- [API Reference](api.md) — OpenAPI 3.1 spec and SDK generation
+- [QA Test Suite](../contributor/qa-test-suite.md) — Test procedures and release sign-off
+- [Test Environment](../contributor/test-environment.md) — Docker Compose test environment setup