mirror of
https://github.com/shankar0123/certctl.git
synced 2026-06-13 05:58:56 +00:00
security: require SCEP challenge password when SCEP enabled (fixes H-2)
Problem (CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function):
internal/service/scep.go PKCSReq skipped the shared-secret check when
s.challengePassword was empty. An unconfigured-but-enabled SCEP server
accepted any unauthenticated client reaching /scep and issued a
certificate against the configured issuer for any CSR with a valid
signature. No audit trail distinguished authenticated from
unauthenticated enrollments. This matches the two-layer fail-closed
pattern already used for C-2 (fb4ce1a): reject at startup AND reject
at the service boundary.
Fix (two layers, defense-in-depth):
Layer 1 — startup pre-flight in cmd/server/main.go:
preflightSCEPChallengePassword returns a non-nil error when SCEP is
enabled and CERTCTL_SCEP_CHALLENGE_PASSWORD is empty. main logs and
os.Exit(1)s before the SCEP service is constructed. Disabled SCEP is
unaffected. The helper is unit-testable in isolation.
Layer 2 — service-layer rejection in internal/service/scep.go:
PKCSReq refuses enrollment when s.challengePassword == "" even though
main already blocks this state — protects future call sites (tests,
library reuse, a REST-over-HTTPS wrapper). When a secret is
configured, the comparison now uses crypto/subtle.ConstantTimeCompare
so response time does not leak the configured secret through a
short-circuiting byte compare.
Files:
- cmd/server/main.go: preflightSCEPChallengePassword helper; call site
inside the `if cfg.SCEP.Enabled` block before issuer lookup; fatal
slog error references CWE-306 and names the env var so operators can
diagnose the startup failure without reading code.
- cmd/server/main_test.go: TestPreflightSCEPChallengePassword with five
table-driven subtests (disabled empty, disabled set, enabled empty
rejected, enabled set, single-char boundary). The enabled-empty case
asserts the error string contains both CERTCTL_SCEP_CHALLENGE_PASSWORD
and CWE-306 so the log message remains actionable.
- internal/config/config.go: SCEPConfig.ChallengePassword godoc now
states the field is REQUIRED when SCEP.Enabled and cross-references
preflightSCEPChallengePassword.
- internal/service/scep.go: imports crypto/subtle; PKCSReq rewritten
with the two-layer check; comment block cites H-2 / CWE-306 and the
constant-time rationale.
- internal/service/scep_test.go: existing tests that relied on the
vulnerable empty-password path now configure a secret on both sides.
TestSCEPService_PKCSReq_ChallengePassword_NotRequired is replaced by
TestSCEPService_PKCSReq_ChallengePassword_EmptyServerConfigRejected
which iterates ["", "any-value", "guess"] against an unconfigured
server and asserts "not configured" in the error. A new
TestSCEPService_PKCSReq_ChallengePassword_ConstantTimeLengthIndependence
exercises same-prefix-longer and wrong-case inputs to guard against a
regression from ConstantTimeCompare to a short-circuiting byte compare.
- internal/service/m11c_crypto_enforcement_test.go: four tests
(RejectsWeakKey, AcceptsStrongKey, MaxTTL_ForwardedToIssuer,
NoProfileRepo_PassesThrough) constructed NewSCEPService with an empty
challenge password and exercised PKCSReq through the now-rejected
vulnerable path. All four now configure "secret123" on both sides with
an inline H-2 comment; the crypto/MaxTTL/profile behavior they assert
is unchanged.
Wire-format / behavioral invariants preserved:
- RFC 8894 SCEP handler is untouched (internal/api/handler/scep.go and
internal/pkcs7/*): GetCACaps/GetCACert responses, PKIOperation request
parsing, and the PKCS#7 certs-only response format are byte-identical.
- RFC 7030 EST handler is untouched
(internal/api/handler/est.go + internal/pkcs7/*).
- Revocation idempotency composite key (H-1, migration 000012) untouched.
- AES-256-GCM config encryption (C-2) untouched.
- CRL DER bytes and OCSP response bytes unchanged.
Verification:
- go build ./... silent success
- go vet ./... silent success
- go test -race -count=1 ./internal/service/ ./cmd/server/
./internal/api/handler/ ./internal/integration/ all OK
- Coverage with comfortable headroom over CI gates:
service 67.8% (gate 55%)
handler 79.0% (gate 60%)
domain 92.7% (gate 40%)
middleware 80.0% (gate 30%)
cmd/server 1.6% (preflightSCEPChallengePassword: 100%)
internal/service/scep.go PKCSReq statement coverage: 100%.
- rg sweeps: no `s.challengePassword != ""` remains;
no `challengePassword != s.challengePassword` remains.
Operational note: operators with SCEP enabled but no challenge password
set will see a fatal startup error and a log line citing
CERTCTL_SCEP_CHALLENGE_PASSWORD and CWE-306 after upgrading. This is the
intended fail-closed behavior. Fix by either setting the env var to a
non-empty shared secret or setting CERTCTL_SCEP_ENABLED=false.
Audit report: certctl-audit-report.md (revision 5) logs this under
H-2 Resolution Log.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -119,7 +119,10 @@ func TestESTService_MaxTTL_ForwardedToIssuer(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
func TestSCEPService_CryptoValidation_RejectsWeakKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
mockIssuer := &mockIssuerConnector{}
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "")
|
||||
// H-2: SCEPService now requires a configured challenge password. Pass a
|
||||
// matching client password so this test exercises the crypto-policy path
|
||||
// rather than being short-circuited by the challenge-password guard.
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "secret123")
|
||||
|
||||
// Profile requiring ECDSA P-384 minimum
|
||||
profileRepo := newM11cProfileRepo()
|
||||
@@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ func TestSCEPService_CryptoValidation_RejectsWeakKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// P-256 CSR should be rejected
|
||||
csrPEM := generateCSRPEM(t, "device.example.com", nil)
|
||||
|
||||
_, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "", "txn-001")
|
||||
_, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "secret123", "txn-001")
|
||||
if err == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected rejection for ECDSA P-256 against P-384 minimum")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -152,7 +155,8 @@ func TestSCEPService_CryptoValidation_AcceptsStrongKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
mockIssuer := &mockIssuerConnector{}
|
||||
auditRepo := newMockAuditRepository()
|
||||
auditSvc := NewAuditService(auditRepo)
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, auditSvc, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "")
|
||||
// H-2: happy path exercises the authenticated branch.
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, auditSvc, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "secret123")
|
||||
|
||||
profileRepo := newM11cProfileRepo()
|
||||
profileRepo.profiles["prof-standard"] = &domain.CertificateProfile{
|
||||
@@ -167,7 +171,7 @@ func TestSCEPService_CryptoValidation_AcceptsStrongKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
csrPEM := generateCSRPEM(t, "device-ok.example.com", nil)
|
||||
|
||||
result, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "", "txn-002")
|
||||
result, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "secret123", "txn-002")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected success: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -179,7 +183,8 @@ func TestSCEPService_CryptoValidation_AcceptsStrongKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestSCEPService_MaxTTL_ForwardedToIssuer(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
capturingMock := &capturingIssuerConnector{}
|
||||
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", capturingMock, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "")
|
||||
// H-2: challenge password required for enrollment.
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", capturingMock, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "secret123")
|
||||
|
||||
profileRepo := newM11cProfileRepo()
|
||||
profileRepo.profiles["prof-device"] = &domain.CertificateProfile{
|
||||
@@ -192,7 +197,7 @@ func TestSCEPService_MaxTTL_ForwardedToIssuer(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
csrPEM := generateCSRPEM(t, "mdm-device.example.com", nil)
|
||||
|
||||
_, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "", "txn-003")
|
||||
_, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "secret123", "txn-003")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected error: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -341,12 +346,13 @@ func TestESTService_NoProfileRepo_PassesThrough(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
func TestSCEPService_NoProfileRepo_PassesThrough(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
mockIssuer := &mockIssuerConnector{}
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "")
|
||||
// H-2: challenge password required for enrollment.
|
||||
svc := NewSCEPService("iss-local", mockIssuer, nil, slog.New(slog.NewTextHandler(os.Stderr, &slog.HandlerOptions{Level: slog.LevelError})), "secret123")
|
||||
svc.SetProfileID("nonexistent-profile")
|
||||
|
||||
csrPEM := generateCSRPEM(t, "no-profile-scep.example.com", nil)
|
||||
|
||||
result, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "", "txn-004")
|
||||
result, err := svc.PKCSReq(context.Background(), csrPEM, "secret123", "txn-004")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected success when no profile repo set: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user