mirror of
https://github.com/shankar0123/certctl.git
synced 2026-06-11 13:48:51 +00:00
docs: Phase 14 — Last reviewed line sweep across docs/
Per Phase 1 audit at cowork/docs-overhaul-phase-1-audit-2026-05-04/. Adds a `> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05` line right after the H1 heading of every doc that didn't already have one (41 files). This dates the freshness clock for the future Phase 4 per-doc review. The discipline going forward: when a doc's content gets a meaningful edit, bump the date. When the date gets old (e.g., >6 months), the doc earns a freshness-review pass. Mechanical insertion via awk one-liner, applied to every docs/*.md that didn't already match `grep -q 'Last reviewed:'`. Files that already carried the line from earlier Phase 2 work (the navigation index, the new connector docs, the new SCEP server / legacy-clients- TLS-1.2 / release-verification docs, and the 5 per-connector deep dives) were skipped to avoid duplicate insertion. Net: every doc in docs/ now has a Last reviewed line.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Compliance Mapping Guides
|
||||
|
||||
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
|
||||
|
||||
certctl is a certificate lifecycle management tool, not a compliance product. It doesn't make you compliant — your organization, policies, and processes do that. What certctl provides is tooling that supports the technical controls auditors and evaluators look for when assessing certificate and key management practices.
|
||||
|
||||
These guides map certctl's features to three widely referenced compliance frameworks. They're designed for security engineers, IT auditors, and procurement teams evaluating certctl for environments with regulatory requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# NIST SP 800-57 Key Management Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
|
||||
|
||||
NIST SP 800-57 Part 1 Rev 5 (May 2020) is the authoritative US government guidance on cryptographic key management. This document maps certctl's implementation to its recommendations. certctl follows NIST guidance where applicable; this guide documents the alignment and identifies gaps for future roadmap planning.
|
||||
|
||||
## Contents
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# PCI-DSS 4.0 Compliance Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
|
||||
|
||||
This guide maps certctl's existing capabilities to PCI-DSS 4.0 requirements relevant to TLS certificate and cryptographic key management. It is **not a compliance attestation** — a qualified security assessor (QSA) must evaluate your organization's complete control environment. Rather, this document helps you understand which PCI-DSS control objectives certctl supports and where operator responsibility lies.
|
||||
|
||||
Organizations subject to PCI-DSS typically need to demonstrate control over certificate issuance, renewal, rotation, revocation, and key management. Certctl automates the technical controls for certificate lifecycle; compliance depends on how you deploy, monitor, and audit it.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# SOC 2 Type II Compliance Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
> Last reviewed: 2026-05-05
|
||||
|
||||
This guide maps certctl's implemented features to AICPA SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria (TSC). It is **not a SOC 2 certification claim** — rather, it helps security engineers, auditors, and evaluators understand how certctl supports your organization's SOC 2 compliance posture. Use this as evidence input for your own control assessment during SOC 2 audits.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Use This Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user