mirror of
https://github.com/shankar0123/certctl.git
synced 2026-06-11 18:18:52 +00:00
feat: M15b — OCSP responder, DER CRL, short-lived exemption, revocation GUI
Backend:
- Embedded OCSP responder: GET /api/v1/ocsp/{issuer_id}/{serial} returns
signed OCSP responses (good/revoked/unknown) using CA key
- DER-encoded X.509 CRL: GET /api/v1/crl/{issuer_id} returns proper DER CRL
signed by issuing CA with 24h validity window
- Short-lived cert exemption: certs with profile TTL < 1 hour skip CRL/OCSP
(expiry is sufficient revocation for ephemeral workloads)
- Extended issuer connector interface with GenerateCRL and SignOCSPResponse
- Local CA implements full CRL/OCSP signing; ACME and step-ca return
appropriate "use native endpoint" errors
- IssuerConnectorAdapter bridges new methods between layers
Frontend:
- Revoke button on certificate detail page with RFC 5280 reason modal
- Revocation banner with reason display and timestamp
- Revocation status indicators in lifecycle section
- "Revoked" filter option in certificates list
- API client: revokeCertificate() function and Certificate type extensions
Tests: ~31 new tests across connector, service, handler, and adapter layers
Docs: milestones renumbered (M13-M14, M16-M18), M15b marked complete
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -617,13 +617,13 @@ For production, you would also add an ingress controller, TLS termination for th
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
certctl uses a layered testing approach aligned with the handler → service → repository architecture, with 600+ tests across five layers (service, handler, integration, connector, and frontend). The goal is high-confidence regression prevention at the service and handler layers, where the most complex business logic lives, combined with integration tests that exercise the full request path from HTTP to database.
|
||||
certctl uses a layered testing approach aligned with the handler → service → repository architecture, with 630+ tests across five layers (service, handler, integration, connector, and frontend). The goal is high-confidence regression prevention at the service and handler layers, where the most complex business logic lives, combined with integration tests that exercise the full request path from HTTP to database.
|
||||
|
||||
**Service layer unit tests** (`internal/service/*_test.go`) — 207 test functions across 15 files with mock repositories. These test all business logic in isolation: certificate CRUD with validation, certificate revocation (success, already-revoked, archived, invalid reason, all RFC 5280 reason codes, issuer notification, notification service integration), agent lifecycle (registration, heartbeat, CSR submission with both keygen modes), job state machine (creation, processing, cancellation, retry logic), policy evaluation (all 5 rule types, violation creation), renewal and issuance flow (server-side and agent-side keygen paths), notification deduplication (threshold tag matching, channel routing), team/owner/agent group CRUD with pagination and audit recording, issuer service CRUD with connection testing, and the issuer connector adapter (type translation between connector and service layers including revocation). Mock repositories are simple structs with function fields, avoiding heavy mocking frameworks — this keeps tests readable and avoids coupling to mock library APIs.
|
||||
**Service layer unit tests** (`internal/service/*_test.go`) — ~238 test functions across 15 files with mock repositories. These test all business logic in isolation: certificate CRUD with validation, certificate revocation (success, already-revoked, archived, invalid reason, all RFC 5280 reason codes, issuer notification, notification service integration, OCSP/CRL generation), agent lifecycle (registration, heartbeat, CSR submission with both keygen modes), job state machine (creation, processing, cancellation, retry logic), policy evaluation (all 5 rule types, violation creation), renewal and issuance flow (server-side and agent-side keygen paths), notification deduplication (threshold tag matching, channel routing), team/owner/agent group CRUD with pagination and audit recording, issuer service CRUD with connection testing, and the issuer connector adapter (type translation between connector and service layers including revocation). Mock repositories are simple structs with function fields, avoiding heavy mocking frameworks — this keeps tests readable and avoids coupling to mock library APIs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Handler layer tests** (`internal/api/handler/*_test.go`) — 226 test functions across 11 files using Go's `httptest` package. Every handler file has a corresponding test file: certificates (36 tests including revocation and CRL), agents (28 tests), jobs (21 tests including approve/reject), notifications (11 tests), policies (19 tests), profiles (18 tests), issuers (17 tests), targets (17 tests), agent groups (12 tests), teams (26 tests), and owners (21 tests). Each test file follows the same pattern: a mock service struct with function fields, `httptest.NewRecorder` for capturing responses, and a shared `contextWithRequestID()` helper. Tests cover the happy path, input validation (missing fields, invalid JSON, empty IDs, name length limits), error propagation from the service layer, method-not-allowed responses, and pagination parameters.
|
||||
**Handler layer tests** (`internal/api/handler/*_test.go`) — ~257 test functions across 11 files using Go's `httptest` package. Every handler file has a corresponding test file: certificates (50 tests including revocation, DER CRL, and OCSP), agents (28 tests), jobs (21 tests including approve/reject), notifications (11 tests), policies (19 tests), profiles (18 tests), issuers (17 tests), targets (17 tests), agent groups (12 tests), teams (26 tests), and owners (21 tests). Each test file follows the same pattern: a mock service struct with function fields, `httptest.NewRecorder` for capturing responses, and a shared `contextWithRequestID()` helper. Tests cover the happy path, input validation (missing fields, invalid JSON, empty IDs, name length limits), error propagation from the service layer, method-not-allowed responses, and pagination parameters.
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration tests** (`internal/integration/`) — Two test files exercising the full stack from HTTP request through router, handler, service, and postgres repository layers. `lifecycle_test.go` has 11 subtests covering the complete certificate lifecycle: team/owner creation, certificate creation, issuer verification, renewal trigger, job verification, agent registration, CSR submission, deployment, and status reporting. `negative_test.go` has 14 subtests covering error paths, 19 M11b endpoint tests, and 4 revocation endpoint tests: nonexistent resource lookups (404s), invalid request bodies (malformed JSON, missing required fields), invalid CSR submission, heartbeat for nonexistent agents, wrong HTTP methods on list endpoints, empty list responses, renewal on nonexistent certificates, expired certificate lifecycle, team/owner/agent group CRUD validation, revocation success, already-revoked rejection, not-found revocation, and CRL retrieval. Both use a shared `setupTestServer()` that builds a fully-wired server with real postgres repositories and the Local CA issuer connector.
|
||||
**Integration tests** (`internal/integration/`) — Two test files exercising the full stack from HTTP request through router, handler, service, and postgres repository layers. `lifecycle_test.go` has 11 subtests covering the complete certificate lifecycle: team/owner creation, certificate creation, issuer verification, renewal trigger, job verification, agent registration, CSR submission, deployment, and status reporting. `negative_test.go` has 14 subtests covering error paths, 19 M11b endpoint tests, and 8 revocation endpoint tests (M15a+M15b): nonexistent resource lookups (404s), invalid request bodies (malformed JSON, missing required fields), invalid CSR submission, heartbeat for nonexistent agents, wrong HTTP methods on list endpoints, empty list responses, renewal on nonexistent certificates, expired certificate lifecycle, team/owner/agent group CRUD validation, revocation success, already-revoked rejection, not-found revocation, JSON CRL retrieval, DER CRL retrieval, OCSP response retrieval, and short-lived cert exemption. Both use a shared `setupTestServer()` that builds a fully-wired server with real postgres repositories and the Local CA issuer connector.
|
||||
|
||||
**Frontend tests** (`web/src/api/client.test.ts`, `web/src/api/utils.test.ts`) — 53 Vitest tests covering the API client and utility functions. The API client tests mock `globalThis.fetch` and verify all endpoint functions (certificates, agents, jobs, policies, issuers, targets, notifications, audit, health) send correct HTTP methods, URLs, headers, and request bodies. They also test API key management (store/retrieve/clear), auth header propagation, 401 event dispatching, and error handling (server messages, error fields, status text fallback). The utility tests use `vi.useFakeTimers()` for deterministic date testing and cover `formatDate`, `formatDateTime`, `timeAgo`, `daysUntil`, and `expiryColor`. The test environment uses jsdom with `@testing-library/jest-dom` matchers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user