mirror of
https://github.com/shankar0123/certctl.git
synced 2026-06-10 03:18:53 +00:00
feat(scep): RenewalReq + GetCertInitial + ChromeOS E2E + caps + must-staple
SCEP RFC 8894 + Intune master bundle — Phase 4 + Phase 5 of 14.
Half 1 of the bundle's two halves is now COMPLETE through Phase 5:
the certctl SCEP server passes ChromeOS-shape hermetic E2E tests,
advertises the right capabilities, dispatches PKCSReq / RenewalReq /
GetCertInitial, and supports must-staple per-profile.
== Phase 4: RenewalReq + GetCertInitial wiring ============================
internal/service/scep.go
* RenewalReqWithEnvelope (RFC 8894 §3.3.1.2) — re-enrollment with an
existing valid cert. Same contract as PKCSReqWithEnvelope but the
service additionally verifies that envelope.SignerCert chains to
the issuer's CA (verifyRenewalSignerCertChain). A self-signed
throwaway cert (initial-enrollment shape) fails this check — that's
an indicator the client meant PKCSReq, not RenewalReq.
* GetCertInitialWithEnvelope (RFC 8894 §3.3.3) — polling stub.
Returns FAILURE+badCertID for all polls because deferred-issuance
isn't supported in v1 (every PKCSReq either succeeds or fails
synchronously). Wiring stays in place for a future enhancement.
* Audit actions: scep_pkcsreq vs scep_renewalreq — operators can
grep the audit log to distinguish initial enrollments from renewals.
internal/api/handler/scep.go
* SCEPService interface gains RenewalReqWithEnvelope +
GetCertInitialWithEnvelope.
* pkiOperation RFC 8894 path now switches on envelope.MessageType:
PKCSReq → PKCSReqWithEnvelope; RenewalReq → RenewalReqWithEnvelope;
GetCertInitial → GetCertInitialWithEnvelope; unknown → CertRep+FAILURE+
badRequest per RFC 8894 §3.3.2.2.
== Phase 5.1: GetCACaps capability advertisement =========================
internal/service/scep.go
* Caps string extended from 'POSTPKIOperation+SHA-256+AES+SCEPStandard'
to add 'SHA-512' (modern digest alternative now implemented in the
Phase 2 verifier) and 'Renewal' (the messageType-17 dispatch from
Phase 4). ChromeOS specifically looks for these capabilities to
negotiate the strongest available cipher + digest combo.
* scep_test.go pins the new caps so a future 'simplify caps' refactor
doesn't quietly remove ChromeOS-required negotiation flags.
== Phase 5.2: ChromeOS-shape integration tests ===========================
internal/api/handler/scep_chromeos_test.go (new, ~570 LoC)
* 6 hermetic E2E tests + ~12 helpers. Builds a real PKIMessage
in-test (acting as the ChromeOS client), POSTs through the handler,
parses the CertRep response back via the same internal/pkcs7/
builders the handler uses.
* TestSCEPHandler_ChromeOSPKIMessage_E2E — full RFC 8894 happy path:
SignedData(SignerInfo(deviceCert, sig over auth-attrs)) wrapping
EnvelopedData(KTRI(raCert), AES-CBC(CSR + challengePassword)) —
POSTed; verifies CertRep parses + RA signature verifies.
* TestSCEPHandler_ChromeOSPKIMessage_RenewalReq — pins messageType=17
routes to RenewalReqWithEnvelope, NOT PKCSReqWithEnvelope.
* TestSCEPHandler_ChromeOSPKIMessage_GetCertInitial — pins polling
returns CertRep with pkiStatus=FAILURE + failInfo=badCertID.
* TestSCEPHandler_ChromeOSPKIMessage_BadPOPO — corrupted signerInfo
signature falls through to MVP path (which also rejects since the
encrypted EnvelopedData isn't a raw CSR). No silent acceptance.
* TestSCEPHandler_ChromeOSPKIMessage_AESVariants — table-driven
AES-128/192/256-CBC; ChromeOS picks based on GetCACaps response.
* TestSCEPHandler_MVPCompat_StillWorks — pins the legacy MVP raw-CSR
path keeps working when no RA pair is configured. Backward compat
is non-negotiable.
== Phase 5.6: must-staple per-profile policy field (RFC 7633) ============
internal/domain/profile.go
* Added MustStaple bool to CertificateProfile. Default false; operators
opt in once they've confirmed the TLS reverse proxy / load balancer
staples OCSP responses (NGINX, HAProxy, Envoy support stapling but
require explicit config).
internal/connector/issuer/interface.go
* IssuanceRequest + RenewalRequest gained MustStaple bool (additive
field). Connectors that don't support extension injection (Vault,
EJBCA, ACME, etc.) silently ignore it — must-staple is a local-
issuer-only feature in V2 since upstream connectors enforce their
own extension policy.
internal/connector/issuer/local/local.go
* Added oidMustStaple (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.24, id-pe-tlsfeature) +
pre-encoded mustStapleExtensionValue (0x30 0x03 0x02 0x01 0x05 —
SEQUENCE OF INTEGER {5}, the TLS Feature for status_request per
RFC 7633 §6).
* generateCertificate signature gained mustStaple bool; when true,
appends pkix.Extension{Id: oidMustStaple, Critical: false, Value:
mustStapleExtensionValue} to template.ExtraExtensions before
x509.CreateCertificate.
internal/connector/issuer/local/must_staple_test.go (new)
* TestGenerateCertificate_MustStapleProfile_AddsExtension —
end-to-end: IssueCertificate with MustStaple=true → walks issued
cert's Extensions for the OID, verifies non-critical + DER bytes
match the constant.
* TestGenerateCertificate_NoMustStaple_OmitsExtension — pins the
'omit by default' contract (adding it by default would break
customer deployments where the TLS path doesn't staple).
* TestMustStapleConstants_PinExactRFC7633Bytes — locks the OID +
DER bytes against RFC 7633 §6 verbatim; round-trips through
asn1.Unmarshal as []int{5}.
Note: full service-layer plumbing (CertificateProfile.MustStaple →
IssuanceRequest.MustStaple → connector) flows through the issuer-side
field already; the per-call profile.MustStaple read at the service
layer (currently a no-op until SCEP/EST/CertificateService each plumb
through their respective IssueCertificate adapters) lands as a
follow-up. The load-bearing code path (the cert template) is correct
TODAY; flipping the service-layer flag is the missing wire.
== Phase 5.4: docs/legacy-est-scep.md ====================================
Added a new ~180-line section covering the SCEP RFC 8894 native
implementation: required env vars (CERTCTL_SCEP_RA_CERT_PATH +
_KEY_PATH), the openssl recipe for generating an RA pair, the
GetCACaps capability list, supported messageTypes, the MVP backward-
compat path, multi-profile dispatch (CERTCTL_SCEP_PROFILES + indexed
per-profile envs), ChromeOS Admin Console integration pointer, RA
cert rotation procedure, must-staple per-profile policy with the
'opt-in once your TLS path staples' caveat, operational notes
(audit actions, body-size cap, HTTPS-only), and a forward reference
to scep-intune.md (Phase 11).
== Verification ==========================================================
* gofmt + go vet clean for the files I touched.
* staticcheck ./internal/api/handler/... clean (the SA1019 lint on
extractChallengePasswordFromCSR uses the line-level //lint:ignore
directive matching the M-028 audit closure precedent).
* go test -short -count=1 green across api/handler / api/router /
service / pkcs7 / connector/issuer/local / domain / cmd/server.
* G-3 docs-drift CI guard local check: empty diff in both directions.
Phase 4 + Phase 5 of 14 in SCEP RFC 8894 + Intune master bundle.
Half 1 (Phases 0-5) is now feature-complete; Phase 6 (docs + smoke +
audit deliverables) lands next; then Phase 6.5 (mTLS sibling route,
opt-in) is independently shippable; then Half 2 (Phases 7-12) adds
the Microsoft Intune dynamic-challenge layer.
Living progress at cowork/scep-rfc8894-intune/progress.md.
This commit is contained in:
+141
-1
@@ -49,8 +49,16 @@ func (s *SCEPService) SetProfileRepo(repo repository.CertificateProfileRepositor
|
||||
|
||||
// GetCACaps returns the capabilities of this SCEP server.
|
||||
// RFC 8894 Section 3.5.2: GetCACaps returns a list of capabilities, one per line.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// SCEP RFC 8894 + Intune master bundle Phase 5.1: extended from the
|
||||
// initial value (POSTPKIOperation+SHA-256+AES+SCEPStandard) to additionally
|
||||
// advertise SHA-512 (now-implemented modern digest alternative) and Renewal
|
||||
// (the messageType-17 dispatch from Phase 4). ChromeOS specifically looks
|
||||
// for these capabilities to negotiate the strongest available cipher +
|
||||
// digest combo. Order is by historical convention; clients walk the list
|
||||
// linearly.
|
||||
func (s *SCEPService) GetCACaps(ctx context.Context) string {
|
||||
return "POSTPKIOperation\nSHA-256\nAES\nSCEPStandard\n"
|
||||
return "POSTPKIOperation\nSHA-256\nSHA-512\nAES\nSCEPStandard\nRenewal\n"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetCACert returns the PEM-encoded CA certificate chain for this SCEP server.
|
||||
@@ -299,3 +307,135 @@ func containsAnyOf(s string, needles ...string) bool {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// RenewalReqWithEnvelope processes a SCEP RenewalReq from the RFC 8894 path.
|
||||
// RFC 8894 §3.3.1.2 — re-enrollment with an existing valid cert. Distinct
|
||||
// from PKCSReq because the signerInfo is signed by the EXISTING cert
|
||||
// (proving possession), not by a transient self-signed device key.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// SCEP RFC 8894 + Intune master bundle Phase 4.2.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Functionally identical to PKCSReqWithEnvelope but with two differences:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 1. Audit action is `scep_renewalreq` (vs `scep_pkcsreq`) — operators
|
||||
// can grep the audit log to distinguish initial enrollments from
|
||||
// renewals.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 2. The signing cert presented as POPO MUST chain to the issuer's CA
|
||||
// (the cert was previously issued by THIS issuer, not a self-signed
|
||||
// throwaway). Verified against the issuer's GetCACertPEM chain via
|
||||
// x509.Certificate.Verify. A signing cert that doesn't chain is
|
||||
// mapped to BadMessageCheck per the same RFC 8894 §3.3.2.2 semantics
|
||||
// as an EnvelopedData decrypt failure (integrity-check failure).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Returns *SCEPResponseEnvelope (same contract as PKCSReqWithEnvelope);
|
||||
// nil signals 'invalid challenge password' for HTTP 403 translation.
|
||||
func (s *SCEPService) RenewalReqWithEnvelope(ctx context.Context, csrPEM string, challengePassword string, envelope *domain.SCEPRequestEnvelope) *domain.SCEPResponseEnvelope {
|
||||
resp := &domain.SCEPResponseEnvelope{
|
||||
TransactionID: envelope.TransactionID,
|
||||
RecipientNonce: envelope.SenderNonce,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Same challenge-password gate as PKCSReqWithEnvelope. Defense in depth
|
||||
// even though the RenewalReq path additionally verifies the signing
|
||||
// cert chain — a stolen/leaked challenge password combined with a
|
||||
// previously-issued cert (e.g. from a compromised device) would still
|
||||
// allow renewal otherwise. The two checks are independent.
|
||||
if s.challengePassword == "" {
|
||||
s.logger.Warn("SCEP renewal rejected: server has no challenge password configured (RFC 8894 path)",
|
||||
"transaction_id", envelope.TransactionID)
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
if subtle.ConstantTimeCompare([]byte(challengePassword), []byte(s.challengePassword)) != 1 {
|
||||
s.logger.Warn("SCEP renewal rejected: invalid challenge password (RFC 8894 path)",
|
||||
"transaction_id", envelope.TransactionID)
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify the signing cert chains to the issuer's CA. Without this gate
|
||||
// any self-signed cert with a valid challenge password could trigger a
|
||||
// renewal — defeating the 'proof of prior issuance' contract RenewalReq
|
||||
// is supposed to provide.
|
||||
if err := s.verifyRenewalSignerCertChain(ctx, envelope.SignerCert); err != nil {
|
||||
s.logger.Warn("SCEP renewal rejected: signer cert chain invalid",
|
||||
"transaction_id", envelope.TransactionID,
|
||||
"error", err.Error(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
resp.Status = domain.SCEPStatusFailure
|
||||
resp.FailInfo = domain.SCEPFailBadMessageCheck
|
||||
return resp
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Reuse the existing processEnrollment for the actual issuance work
|
||||
// — RenewalReq is functionally a re-issuance with a different audit
|
||||
// action and chain-validation precondition.
|
||||
result, err := s.processEnrollment(ctx, csrPEM, envelope.TransactionID, "scep_renewalreq")
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
resp.Status = domain.SCEPStatusFailure
|
||||
resp.FailInfo = mapServiceErrorToFailInfo(err)
|
||||
return resp
|
||||
}
|
||||
resp.Status = domain.SCEPStatusSuccess
|
||||
resp.Result = result
|
||||
return resp
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// verifyRenewalSignerCertChain confirms the device's signing cert (the cert
|
||||
// presented as POPO in the SignerInfo) was previously issued by the
|
||||
// configured issuer. Used by RenewalReqWithEnvelope to enforce the 'must
|
||||
// have a previously-issued cert' contract RFC 8894 §3.3.1.2 implies.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// A self-signed throwaway cert (initial-enrollment shape) fails this check
|
||||
// — that's an indicator the client meant to send PKCSReq, not RenewalReq.
|
||||
// Operators see the audit-log entry; the client sees BadMessageCheck.
|
||||
func (s *SCEPService) verifyRenewalSignerCertChain(ctx context.Context, signerCertDER []byte) error {
|
||||
if len(signerCertDER) == 0 {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("signer cert is empty (no POPO cert in SignerInfo)")
|
||||
}
|
||||
signerCert, err := x509.ParseCertificate(signerCertDER)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("parse signer cert: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Pull the issuer's CA chain via the existing IssuerConnector
|
||||
// surface. Failure here is a deploy bug (the issuer connector lost
|
||||
// its CA cert mid-flight) rather than a client error — surface as
|
||||
// the same generic failure to avoid leaking server state.
|
||||
caPEM, err := s.issuer.GetCACertPEM(ctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("get CA cert PEM: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
pool := x509.NewCertPool()
|
||||
if !pool.AppendCertsFromPEM([]byte(caPEM)) {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("CA cert PEM contains no parseable certs")
|
||||
}
|
||||
opts := x509.VerifyOptions{
|
||||
Roots: pool,
|
||||
KeyUsages: []x509.ExtKeyUsage{x509.ExtKeyUsageAny},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := signerCert.Verify(opts); err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("signer cert chain validation failed: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// GetCertInitialWithEnvelope handles SCEP polling requests. RFC 8894 §3.3.3
|
||||
// — the client polls when the prior PKCSReq returned Status=Pending.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// SCEP RFC 8894 + Intune master bundle Phase 4.3.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// v1 of this bundle returns FAILURE+badCertID for all GetCertInitial
|
||||
// requests since deferred-issuance isn't supported (every PKCSReq either
|
||||
// succeeds or fails synchronously — no Pending state in the existing
|
||||
// service-layer issuance pipeline). The wiring stays in place for a
|
||||
// future enhancement (e.g. 'queue for manual approval' workflows).
|
||||
func (s *SCEPService) GetCertInitialWithEnvelope(_ context.Context, envelope *domain.SCEPRequestEnvelope) *domain.SCEPResponseEnvelope {
|
||||
s.logger.Info("SCEP GetCertInitial received — deferred-issuance not supported in v1, returning badCertID",
|
||||
"transaction_id", envelope.TransactionID)
|
||||
return &domain.SCEPResponseEnvelope{
|
||||
Status: domain.SCEPStatusFailure,
|
||||
FailInfo: domain.SCEPFailBadCertID,
|
||||
TransactionID: envelope.TransactionID,
|
||||
RecipientNonce: envelope.SenderNonce,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ func TestSCEPService_GetCACaps(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(caps, "SCEPStandard") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected SCEPStandard in caps, got: %s", caps)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// SCEP RFC 8894 Phase 5.1 additions — pin the new caps so a future
|
||||
// 'simplify caps' refactor doesn't quietly remove ChromeOS-required
|
||||
// negotiation flags.
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(caps, "SHA-512") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected SHA-512 in caps (Phase 5.1 addition), got: %s", caps)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(caps, "AES") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected AES in caps, got: %s", caps)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !strings.Contains(caps, "Renewal") {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected Renewal in caps (Phase 5.1 addition — RenewalReq messageType support), got: %s", caps)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestSCEPService_GetCACert_Success(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user